VIPS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 7.36% compared to Vipshop Holdings's net margin of 3.35%. Vipshop Holdings's return on equity of 19.51% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

Vipshop Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.53, signalling upside risk potential of 2.67%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 57.07%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Vipshop Holdings, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Vipshop Holdings.

Vipshop Holdings has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.158% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.271, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 127.124%.

Vipshop Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Vipshop Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vipshop Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Vipshop Holdings's net income of $340.1M is higher than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Vipshop Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.08x while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 4.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vipshop Holdings is 0.58x versus 0.23x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cango has a net margin of 7.36% compared to Vipshop Holdings's net margin of 8.37%. Vipshop Holdings's return on equity of 19.51% beat Cango's return on equity of 7.6%.

Vipshop Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.53, signalling upside risk potential of 2.67%. On the other hand Cango has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -22.99%. Given that Vipshop Holdings has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe Vipshop Holdings is more attractive than Cango.

Vipshop Holdings has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.158% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cango has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.31%.

Vipshop Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cango offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vipshop Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cango pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vipshop Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Cango quarterly revenues of $92.8M. Vipshop Holdings's net income of $340.1M is higher than Cango's net income of $7.8M. Notably, Vipshop Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.08x while Cango's PE ratio is 8.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vipshop Holdings is 0.58x versus 3.61x for Cango. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JD.com has a net margin of 7.36% compared to Vipshop Holdings's net margin of 2.84%. Vipshop Holdings's return on equity of 19.51% beat JD.com's return on equity of 13.91%.

Vipshop Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.53, signalling upside risk potential of 2.67%. On the other hand JD.com has an analysts' consensus of $55.10 which suggests that it could grow by 32.51%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than Vipshop Holdings, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than Vipshop Holdings.

Vipshop Holdings has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.158% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JD.com has a beta of 0.428, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.199%.

Vipshop Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JD.com offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Vipshop Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vipshop Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are smaller than JD.com quarterly revenues of $48.2B. Vipshop Holdings's net income of $340.1M is lower than JD.com's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Vipshop Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.08x while JD.com's PE ratio is 11.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vipshop Holdings is 0.58x versus 0.40x for JD.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of 7.36% compared to Vipshop Holdings's net margin of -36.2%. Vipshop Holdings's return on equity of 19.51% beat NIO's return on equity of -120.71%.

Vipshop Holdings has a consensus price target of $16.53, signalling upside risk potential of 2.67%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $5.23 which suggests that it could grow by 39.5%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than Vipshop Holdings, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than Vipshop Holdings.

Vipshop Holdings has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.158% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.806, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.637%.

Vipshop Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vipshop Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vipshop Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Vipshop Holdings's net income of $340.1M is higher than NIO's net income of -$991.2M. Notably, Vipshop Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.08x while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vipshop Holdings is 0.58x versus 0.84x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.