Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
52
BABA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$154.37
Seasonality move
:
0.33%
Day range:
$153.15 - $155.50
52-week range:
$95.73 - $192.67
Dividend yield:
0.68%
P/E ratio:
21.24x
P/S ratio:
2.63x
P/B ratio:
2.54x
Volume:
6.6M
Avg. volume:
12.9M
1-year change:
22.64%
Market cap:
$368.3B
Revenue:
$138B
EPS (TTM):
$7.26
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
|
$41.9B | $1.58 | 10.06% | 81.28% | $198.30 |
|
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
|
$1.7B | $3.58 | 5.32% | 0.26% | $127.56 |
|
JD
JD.com, Inc.
|
$51.1B | $0.10 | 7.59% | -48.44% | $40.49 |
|
KSS
Kohl's Corp.
|
$5.1B | $0.85 | -5.94% | 98.54% | $21.50 |
|
NIO
NIO, Inc.
|
$4.8B | $0.01 | 101.53% | -70.46% | $6.52 |
|
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
|
$24.8B | $0.45 | 19.97% | 253.25% | $421.73 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
|
$154.27 | $198.30 | $368.3B | 21.24x | $2.00 | 0.68% | 2.63x |
|
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
|
$95.90 | $127.56 | $4.4B | 9.20x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.92x |
|
JD
JD.com, Inc.
|
$27.27 | $40.49 | $38.7B | 9.21x | $1.00 | 3.67% | 0.23x |
|
KSS
Kohl's Corp.
|
$19.26 | $21.50 | $2.2B | 11.29x | $0.13 | 2.6% | 0.14x |
|
NIO
NIO, Inc.
|
$4.93 | $6.52 | $12.4B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.08x |
|
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
|
$411.71 | $421.73 | $1.5T | 382.63x | $0.00 | 0% | 15.31x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
|
21.43% | 0.160 | 9.05% | 0.93x |
|
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
|
46.2% | 2.031 | 32.98% | 0.66x |
|
JD
JD.com, Inc.
|
32.58% | 0.696 | 26.32% | 0.79x |
|
KSS
Kohl's Corp.
|
63.38% | 3.857 | 373.03% | 0.04x |
|
NIO
NIO, Inc.
|
88.28% | 1.404 | 19.45% | 0.56x |
|
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
|
15.2% | 2.761 | 0.87% | 1.55x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
|
$13.4B | $728.9M | 9.24% | 11.27% | 2.11% | $1.4B |
|
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
|
$771.9M | $157.6M | 22.83% | 41.06% | 12.21% | $131.8M |
|
JD
JD.com, Inc.
|
$7B | -$169.6M | 8.75% | 11.51% | -0.41% | -$1.1B |
|
KSS
Kohl's Corp.
|
$1.3B | $77M | 1.76% | 5.04% | 2.15% | $16M |
|
NIO
NIO, Inc.
|
$422.6M | -$496.1M | -53.96% | -203.88% | -16.29% | -- |
|
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
|
$5B | $1.6B | 4.2% | 4.93% | 6.31% | $1.4B |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BABA or ANF?
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 8.92%. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.27% beat Abercrombie & Fitch Co.'s return on equity of 41.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.38.82% $1.22 $195.7B ANFAbercrombie & Fitch Co.59.81% $2.36 $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About BABA or ANF?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $198.30, signalling upside risk potential of 28.54%. On the other hand Abercrombie & Fitch Co. has an analysts' consensus of $127.56 which suggests that it could grow by 33.01%. Given that Abercrombie & Fitch Co. has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe Abercrombie & Fitch Co. is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.30 4 0 ANFAbercrombie & Fitch Co.6 5 0 -
Is BABA or ANF More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.395, which suggesting that the stock is 60.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abercrombie & Fitch Co. has a beta of 1.186, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.611%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABA or ANF?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. pays 13.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABA or ANF?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $34.6B, which are larger than Abercrombie & Fitch Co. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of $2.9B is higher than Abercrombie & Fitch Co.'s net income of $115.1M. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while Abercrombie & Fitch Co.'s PE ratio is 9.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is 2.63x versus 0.92x for Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.2.63x 21.24x $34.6B $2.9B ANFAbercrombie & Fitch Co.0.92x 9.20x $1.3B $115.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns BABA or JD?
JD.com, Inc. has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 2.13%. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.27% beat JD.com, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.38.82% $1.22 $195.7B JDJD.com, Inc.16.79% $0.50 $58.5B -
What do Analysts Say About BABA or JD?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $198.30, signalling upside risk potential of 28.54%. On the other hand JD.com, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.49 which suggests that it could grow by 48.48%. Given that JD.com, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe JD.com, Inc. is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.30 4 0 JDJD.com, Inc.28 3 1 -
Is BABA or JD More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.395, which suggesting that the stock is 60.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JD.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.404, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.569%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABA or JD?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. JD.com, Inc. offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. pays 13.49% of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com, Inc. pays out 26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABA or JD?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $34.6B, which are smaller than JD.com, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.8B. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of $2.9B is higher than JD.com, Inc.'s net income of $891.5M. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while JD.com, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is 2.63x versus 0.23x for JD.com, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.2.63x 21.24x $34.6B $2.9B JDJD.com, Inc.0.23x 9.21x $41.8B $891.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns BABA or KSS?
Kohl's Corp. has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 0.22%. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.27% beat Kohl's Corp.'s return on equity of 5.04%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.38.82% $1.22 $195.7B KSSKohl's Corp.37.48% $0.07 $10.7B -
What do Analysts Say About BABA or KSS?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $198.30, signalling upside risk potential of 28.54%. On the other hand Kohl's Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $21.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.63%. Given that Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kohl's Corp., analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Kohl's Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.30 4 0 KSSKohl's Corp.2 8 2 -
Is BABA or KSS More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.395, which suggesting that the stock is 60.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kohl's Corp. has a beta of 1.452, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.231%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABA or KSS?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Kohl's Corp. offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. pays 13.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Kohl's Corp. pays out 205.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kohl's Corp.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABA or KSS?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $34.6B, which are larger than Kohl's Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of $2.9B is higher than Kohl's Corp.'s net income of $8M. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while Kohl's Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is 2.63x versus 0.14x for Kohl's Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.2.63x 21.24x $34.6B $2.9B KSSKohl's Corp.0.14x 11.29x $3.6B $8M
-
Which has Higher Returns BABA or NIO?
NIO, Inc. has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net margin of -16.68%. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.27% beat NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -203.88%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.38.82% $1.22 $195.7B NIONIO, Inc.13.88% -$0.21 $5.6B -
What do Analysts Say About BABA or NIO?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $198.30, signalling upside risk potential of 28.54%. On the other hand NIO, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.52 which suggests that it could grow by 32.34%. Given that NIO, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe NIO, Inc. is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.30 4 0 NIONIO, Inc.11 10 1 -
Is BABA or NIO More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.395, which suggesting that the stock is 60.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.626%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABA or NIO?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. NIO, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. pays 13.49% of its earnings as a dividend. NIO, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABA or NIO?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $34.6B, which are larger than NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3B. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of $2.9B is higher than NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$508M. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while NIO, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is 2.63x versus 1.08x for NIO, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.2.63x 21.24x $34.6B $2.9B NIONIO, Inc.1.08x -- $3B -$508M
-
Which has Higher Returns BABA or TSLA?
Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 3.44%. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.27% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.38.82% $1.22 $195.7B TSLATesla, Inc.20.12% $0.24 $97.6B -
What do Analysts Say About BABA or TSLA?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $198.30, signalling upside risk potential of 28.54%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $421.73 which suggests that it could grow by 2.43%. Given that Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.30 4 0 TSLATesla, Inc.16 17 6 -
Is BABA or TSLA More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.395, which suggesting that the stock is 60.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.858, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.812%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABA or TSLA?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. pays 13.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABA or TSLA?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $34.6B, which are larger than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of $2.9B is higher than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 382.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is 2.63x versus 15.31x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.2.63x 21.24x $34.6B $2.9B TSLATesla, Inc.15.31x 382.63x $24.9B $856M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
44
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
23
CAR alert for Feb 20
Avis Budget Group, Inc. [CAR] is down 21.87% over the past day.
Buy
75
HYMC alert for Feb 20
Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. [HYMC] is up 3.81% over the past day.
Sell
1
EPAM alert for Feb 20
EPAM Systems, Inc. [EPAM] is down 16.79% over the past day.
