JD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NIO has a net margin of 2.84% compared to JD.com's net margin of -36.2%. JD.com's return on equity of 13.91% beat NIO's return on equity of -120.71%.

JD.com has a consensus price target of $54.27, signalling upside risk potential of 60.29%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $5.09 which suggests that it could grow by 28.22%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than NIO, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than NIO.

JD.com has a beta of 0.560, which suggesting that the stock is 43.99% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.735, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.455%.

JD.com has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com pays 19.98% of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com quarterly revenues are $48.2B, which are larger than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.7B. JD.com's net income of $1.4B is higher than NIO's net income of -$991.2M. Notably, JD.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.03x while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com is 0.32x versus 0.89x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PDD Holdings has a net margin of 2.84% compared to JD.com's net margin of 24.81%. JD.com's return on equity of 13.91% beat PDD Holdings's return on equity of 44.83%.

JD.com has a consensus price target of $54.27, signalling upside risk potential of 60.29%. On the other hand PDD Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $149.94 which suggests that it could grow by 36.75%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than PDD Holdings, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than PDD Holdings.

JD.com has a beta of 0.560, which suggesting that the stock is 43.99% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDD Holdings has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.647%.

JD.com has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. PDD Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com pays 19.98% of its earnings as a dividend. PDD Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com quarterly revenues are $48.2B, which are larger than PDD Holdings quarterly revenues of $15.4B. JD.com's net income of $1.4B is lower than PDD Holdings's net income of $3.8B. Notably, JD.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.03x while PDD Holdings's PE ratio is 10.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com is 0.32x versus 2.96x for PDD Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of 2.84% compared to JD.com's net margin of -8.26%. JD.com's return on equity of 13.91% beat XPeng's return on equity of -17.11%.

JD.com has a consensus price target of $54.27, signalling upside risk potential of 60.29%. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $24.85 which suggests that it could grow by 26.6%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than XPeng.

JD.com has a beta of 0.560, which suggesting that the stock is 43.99% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

JD.com has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com pays 19.98% of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com quarterly revenues are $48.2B, which are larger than XPeng quarterly revenues of $2.2B. JD.com's net income of $1.4B is higher than XPeng's net income of -$184.8M. Notably, JD.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.03x while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com is 0.32x versus 3.26x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum China Holdings has a net margin of 2.84% compared to JD.com's net margin of 9.8%. JD.com's return on equity of 13.91% beat Yum China Holdings's return on equity of 14.02%.

JD.com has a consensus price target of $54.27, signalling upside risk potential of 60.29%. On the other hand Yum China Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $58.88 which suggests that it could grow by 33.3%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than Yum China Holdings, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than Yum China Holdings.

JD.com has a beta of 0.560, which suggesting that the stock is 43.99% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum China Holdings has a beta of 0.269, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.059%.

JD.com has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. Yum China Holdings offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. JD.com pays 19.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings pays out 27.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com quarterly revenues are $48.2B, which are larger than Yum China Holdings quarterly revenues of $3B. JD.com's net income of $1.4B is higher than Yum China Holdings's net income of $292M. Notably, JD.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.03x while Yum China Holdings's PE ratio is 18.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com is 0.32x versus 1.50x for Yum China Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.