JD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -0.35% compared to JD.com, Inc.'s net margin of 8.31%. JD.com, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.55% beat Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.27%.

JD.com, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.70, signalling upside risk potential of 37.68%. On the other hand Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $199.48 which suggests that it could grow by 46.36%. Given that Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than JD.com, Inc., analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is more attractive than JD.com, Inc..

JD.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.467% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.430, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.965%.

JD.com, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. JD.com, Inc. pays 26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. pays out 13.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com, Inc. quarterly revenues are $49.7B, which are larger than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of $34.6B. JD.com, Inc.'s net income of -$173M is lower than Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of $2.9B. Notably, JD.com, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com, Inc. is 0.23x versus 2.33x for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Li Auto, Inc. has a net margin of -0.35% compared to JD.com, Inc.'s net margin of -2.28%. JD.com, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.55% beat Li Auto, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.47%.

JD.com, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.70, signalling upside risk potential of 37.68%. On the other hand Li Auto, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.55 which suggests that it could grow by 28.32%. Given that JD.com, Inc. has higher upside potential than Li Auto, Inc., analysts believe JD.com, Inc. is more attractive than Li Auto, Inc..

JD.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.467% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto, Inc. has a beta of 0.603, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.746%.

JD.com, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Li Auto, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com, Inc. pays 26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com, Inc. quarterly revenues are $49.7B, which are larger than Li Auto, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. JD.com, Inc.'s net income of -$173M is lower than Li Auto, Inc.'s net income of -$87.2M. Notably, JD.com, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while Li Auto, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com, Inc. is 0.23x versus 1.09x for Li Auto, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO, Inc. has a net margin of -0.35% compared to JD.com, Inc.'s net margin of 0.35%. JD.com, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.55% beat NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -147.28%.

JD.com, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.70, signalling upside risk potential of 37.68%. On the other hand NIO, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.45 which suggests that it could grow by 17.45%. Given that JD.com, Inc. has higher upside potential than NIO, Inc., analysts believe JD.com, Inc. is more attractive than NIO, Inc..

JD.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.467% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.98%.

JD.com, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. NIO, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com, Inc. pays 26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. NIO, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com, Inc. quarterly revenues are $49.7B, which are larger than NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.9B. JD.com, Inc.'s net income of -$173M is lower than NIO, Inc.'s net income of $17.1M. Notably, JD.com, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while NIO, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com, Inc. is 0.23x versus 1.04x for NIO, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -0.35% compared to JD.com, Inc.'s net margin of 5.42%. JD.com, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.55% beat Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.78%.

JD.com, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.70, signalling upside risk potential of 37.68%. On the other hand Yum China Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $62.02 which suggests that it could grow by 17.97%. Given that JD.com, Inc. has higher upside potential than Yum China Holdings, Inc., analysts believe JD.com, Inc. is more attractive than Yum China Holdings, Inc..

JD.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.467% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.109, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.142%.

JD.com, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Yum China Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. JD.com, Inc. pays 26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings, Inc. pays out 38.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com, Inc. quarterly revenues are $49.7B, which are larger than Yum China Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. JD.com, Inc.'s net income of -$173M is lower than Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $153M. Notably, JD.com, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com, Inc. is 0.23x versus 1.66x for Yum China Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.