JD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NIO has a net margin of 4.51% compared to JD.com's net margin of -27.53%. JD.com's return on equity of 11.87% beat NIO's return on equity of -98.45%.

JD.com has a consensus price target of $48.64, signalling upside risk potential of 40.08%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $6.19 which suggests that it could grow by 43.29%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than JD.com, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than JD.com.

JD.com has a beta of 0.384, which suggesting that the stock is 61.636% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.697, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.716%.

JD.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com pays 27.89% of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com quarterly revenues are $36.4B, which are larger than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.6B. JD.com's net income of $1.6B is higher than NIO's net income of -$718.1M. Notably, JD.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.03x while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com is 0.35x versus 0.97x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PDD Holdings has a net margin of 4.51% compared to JD.com's net margin of 25.14%. JD.com's return on equity of 11.87% beat PDD Holdings's return on equity of 48.98%.

JD.com has a consensus price target of $48.64, signalling upside risk potential of 40.08%. On the other hand PDD Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $145.79 which suggests that it could grow by 45.33%. Given that PDD Holdings has higher upside potential than JD.com, analysts believe PDD Holdings is more attractive than JD.com.

JD.com has a beta of 0.384, which suggesting that the stock is 61.636% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDD Holdings has a beta of 0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.677%.

JD.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. PDD Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com pays 27.89% of its earnings as a dividend. PDD Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com quarterly revenues are $36.4B, which are larger than PDD Holdings quarterly revenues of $13.9B. JD.com's net income of $1.6B is lower than PDD Holdings's net income of $3.5B. Notably, JD.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.03x while PDD Holdings's PE ratio is 9.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com is 0.35x versus 2.85x for PDD Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trip.com Group has a net margin of 4.51% compared to JD.com's net margin of 42.62%. JD.com's return on equity of 11.87% beat Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.5%.

JD.com has a consensus price target of $48.64, signalling upside risk potential of 40.08%. On the other hand Trip.com Group has an analysts' consensus of $76.76 which suggests that it could grow by 18.31%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than Trip.com Group, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than Trip.com Group.

JD.com has a beta of 0.384, which suggesting that the stock is 61.636% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.373, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.678%.

JD.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Trip.com Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com pays 27.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Trip.com Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com quarterly revenues are $36.4B, which are larger than Trip.com Group quarterly revenues of $2.2B. JD.com's net income of $1.6B is higher than Trip.com Group's net income of $944.8M. Notably, JD.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.03x while Trip.com Group's PE ratio is 19.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com is 0.35x versus 6.21x for Trip.com Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of 4.51% compared to JD.com's net margin of -17.9%. JD.com's return on equity of 11.87% beat XPeng's return on equity of -17.41%.

JD.com has a consensus price target of $48.64, signalling upside risk potential of 40.08%. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $14.35 which suggests that it could grow by 18.22%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than XPeng.

JD.com has a beta of 0.384, which suggesting that the stock is 61.636% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

JD.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com pays 27.89% of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com quarterly revenues are $36.4B, which are larger than XPeng quarterly revenues of $1.4B. JD.com's net income of $1.6B is higher than XPeng's net income of -$252.5M. Notably, JD.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.03x while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com is 0.35x versus 2.15x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.