YUMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brinker International, Inc. has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.85%. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.78% beat Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 152.94%.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.02, signalling upside risk potential of 11.92%. On the other hand Brinker International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $191.05 which suggests that it could grow by 18.62%. Given that Brinker International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Yum China Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Brinker International, Inc. is more attractive than Yum China Holdings, Inc..

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.135, which suggesting that the stock is 86.523% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.98%.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. Brinker International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Yum China Holdings, Inc. pays 38.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $153M is higher than Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $128.5M. Notably, Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.17x while Brinker International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yum China Holdings, Inc. is 1.74x versus 1.30x for Brinker International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 6.06%. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.78% beat El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.67%.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.02, signalling upside risk potential of 11.92%. On the other hand El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 37.96%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Yum China Holdings, Inc., analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Yum China Holdings, Inc..

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.135, which suggesting that the stock is 86.523% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.065%.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Yum China Holdings, Inc. pays 38.25% of its earnings as a dividend. El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $121.5M. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $153M is higher than El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $7.4M. Notably, Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.17x while El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yum China Holdings, Inc. is 1.74x versus 0.64x for El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 5.91%. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.78% beat Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.71%.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.02, signalling upside risk potential of 11.92%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $196.85 which suggests that it could grow by 8.82%. Given that Yum China Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, Inc., analysts believe Yum China Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse, Inc..

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.135, which suggesting that the stock is 86.523% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a beta of 0.884, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.571%.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Yum China Holdings, Inc. pays 38.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. pays out 37.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Texas Roadhouse, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $153M is higher than Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s net income of $84.9M. Notably, Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.17x while Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yum China Holdings, Inc. is 1.74x versus 2.07x for Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum! Brands, Inc. has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 21.28%. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.78% beat Yum! Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.02, signalling upside risk potential of 11.92%. On the other hand Yum! Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $170.92 which suggests that it could grow by 6.44%. Given that Yum China Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Yum! Brands, Inc., analysts believe Yum China Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Yum! Brands, Inc..

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.135, which suggesting that the stock is 86.523% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum! Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.659, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.117%.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. Yum! Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Yum China Holdings, Inc. pays 38.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum! Brands, Inc. pays out 51.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Yum! Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $153M is lower than Yum! Brands, Inc.'s net income of $535M. Notably, Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.17x while Yum! Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yum China Holdings, Inc. is 1.74x versus 5.49x for Yum! Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.