TXRH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. has a net margin of 5.91% compared to Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s net margin of 0.78%. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.71% beat Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.2%.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a consensus price target of $189.16, signalling upside risk potential of 13.18%. On the other hand Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.88 which suggests that it could grow by 44.03%. Given that Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, Inc., analysts believe Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse, Inc..

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a beta of 0.880, which suggesting that the stock is 12.037% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. has a beta of 1.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.505%.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. offers a yield of 3.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. pays 37.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. pays out 48.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. quarterly revenues of $868M. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s net income of $84.9M is higher than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.'s net income of $6.8M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.53x while Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is 1.91x versus 0.18x for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Darden Restaurants, Inc. has a net margin of 5.91% compared to Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s net margin of 8.47%. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.71% beat Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s return on equity of 50.27%.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a consensus price target of $189.16, signalling upside risk potential of 13.18%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $221.10 which suggests that it could grow by 25.44%. Given that Darden Restaurants, Inc. has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, Inc., analysts believe Darden Restaurants, Inc. is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse, Inc..

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a beta of 0.880, which suggesting that the stock is 12.037% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants, Inc. has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.605%.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Darden Restaurants, Inc. offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. pays 37.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants, Inc. pays out 63.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3B. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s net income of $84.9M is lower than Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s net income of $257.9M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.53x while Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is 1.91x versus 1.68x for Darden Restaurants, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International, Inc. has a net margin of 5.91% compared to Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s net margin of 7.38%. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.71% beat Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 198.61%.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a consensus price target of $189.16, signalling upside risk potential of 13.18%. On the other hand Brinker International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $162.82 which suggests that it could grow by 14.47%. Given that Brinker International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, Inc., analysts believe Brinker International, Inc. is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse, Inc..

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a beta of 0.880, which suggesting that the stock is 12.037% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.346, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.643%.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. Brinker International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. pays 37.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s net income of $84.9M is lower than Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $99.5M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.53x while Brinker International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is 1.91x versus 1.17x for Brinker International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Wendy's Co. has a net margin of 5.91% compared to Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s net margin of 8.05%. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.71% beat The Wendy's Co.'s return on equity of 106.76%.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a consensus price target of $189.16, signalling upside risk potential of 13.18%. On the other hand The Wendy's Co. has an analysts' consensus of $10.25 which suggests that it could grow by 20.02%. Given that The Wendy's Co. has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, Inc., analysts believe The Wendy's Co. is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse, Inc..

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a beta of 0.880, which suggesting that the stock is 12.037% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wendy's Co. has a beta of 0.393, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.673%.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.63%. The Wendy's Co. offers a yield of 7.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. pays 37.71% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wendy's Co. pays out 105.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Wendy's Co.'s is not.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than The Wendy's Co. quarterly revenues of $549.5M. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s net income of $84.9M is higher than The Wendy's Co.'s net income of $44.3M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.53x while The Wendy's Co.'s PE ratio is 9.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is 1.91x versus 0.76x for The Wendy's Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.