TXRH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheesecake Factory has a net margin of 6.63% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 3.47%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 31.98% beat Cheesecake Factory's return on equity of 36.82%.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $153.43, signalling upside risk potential of 8.57%. On the other hand Cheesecake Factory has an analysts' consensus of $36.13 which suggests that it could grow by 2.15%. Given that Texas Roadhouse has higher upside potential than Cheesecake Factory, analysts believe Texas Roadhouse is more attractive than Cheesecake Factory.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.984, which suggesting that the stock is 1.616% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheesecake Factory has a beta of 1.482, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.223%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Cheesecake Factory offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 48.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheesecake Factory pays out 52.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Cheesecake Factory quarterly revenues of $865.5M. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $84.4M is higher than Cheesecake Factory's net income of $30M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.14x while Cheesecake Factory's PE ratio is 18.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.38x versus 0.67x for Cheesecake Factory. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Denny's has a net margin of 6.63% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 5.83%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 31.98% beat Denny's's return on equity of --.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $153.43, signalling upside risk potential of 8.57%. On the other hand Denny's has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.84%. Given that Denny's has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Denny's is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.984, which suggesting that the stock is 1.616% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Denny's has a beta of 2.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.435%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Denny's offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 48.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Denny's pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Denny's quarterly revenues of $111.8M. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $84.4M is higher than Denny's's net income of $6.5M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.14x while Denny's's PE ratio is 17.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.38x versus 0.69x for Denny's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 6.63% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 3.38%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 31.98% beat Brinker International's return on equity of --.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $153.43, signalling upside risk potential of 8.57%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $118.69 which suggests that it could fall by -11.6%. Given that Texas Roadhouse has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Texas Roadhouse is more attractive than Brinker International.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.984, which suggesting that the stock is 1.616% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.520, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.993%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 48.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $84.4M is higher than Brinker International's net income of $38.5M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.14x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 32.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.38x versus 1.35x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of 6.63% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 15.84%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 31.98% beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $153.43, signalling upside risk potential of 8.57%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $342.78 which suggests that it could grow by 25.14%. Given that Wingstop has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Wingstop is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.984, which suggesting that the stock is 1.616% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 1.785, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.483%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 48.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 35.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $162.5M. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $84.4M is higher than Wingstop's net income of $25.7M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.14x while Wingstop's PE ratio is 84.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.38x versus 14.47x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.