Financhill
Buy
52

EAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$161.21
Seasonality move :
5.07%
Day range:
$158.64 - $165.33
52-week range:
$100.30 - $187.12
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
16.27x
P/S ratio:
1.30x
P/B ratio:
18.49x
Volume:
832.8K
Avg. volume:
1.3M
1-year change:
0.54%
Market cap:
$7B
Revenue:
$5.4B
EPS (TTM):
$9.90

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
$1.4B $2.63 3.51% 12.34% $191.05
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
$3B $0.24 6.37% -17.39% $44.47
DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
$3.1B $2.10 5.58% 7.65% $222.34
MCD
McDonald's Corp.
$6.8B $3.05 9.08% 6.34% $339.34
SBUX
Starbucks Corp.
$9.7B $0.59 3.67% 19.98% $100.16
SG
Sweetgreen, Inc.
$159.6M -$0.25 7.8% -16.82% $8.07
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
$161.07 $191.05 $7B 16.27x $0.00 0% 1.30x
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
$36.30 $44.47 $47.3B 31.76x $0.00 0% 4.09x
DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
$211.50 $222.34 $24.4B 22.16x $1.50 2.79% 1.98x
MCD
McDonald's Corp.
$327.58 $339.34 $233.3B 27.41x $1.86 2.19% 8.73x
SBUX
Starbucks Corp.
$93.79 $100.16 $106.9B 78.14x $0.62 2.62% 2.84x
SG
Sweetgreen, Inc.
$5.14 $8.07 $608.4M -- $0.00 0% 0.88x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
82.3% 1.510 28.24% 0.18x
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
64.2% 0.287 10.52% 1.01x
DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
79.99% -0.147 40.16% 0.14x
MCD
McDonald's Corp.
103.42% -0.675 24.86% 0.18x
SBUX
Starbucks Corp.
149.11% 1.505 27.29% 0.42x
SG
Sweetgreen, Inc.
47.54% -1.394 37.73% 1.18x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
$228.6M $168.9M 21.97% 152.94% 11.63% $155.2M
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
$606.1M $441.3M 18.85% 45.91% 14.79% $228.4M
DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
$492.1M $341.1M 11.04% 51.56% 11% $112.3M
MCD
McDonald's Corp.
$3.9B $3.2B 16.69% -- 45.09% $1.6B
SBUX
Starbucks Corp.
$1.5B $909.8M 7.39% -- 9.18% $1.3B
SG
Sweetgreen, Inc.
$4.2M -$26.7M -14.81% -26.26% -15.48% -$38.8M

Brinker International, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns EAT or CMG?

    Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to Brinker International, Inc.'s net margin of 11.09%. Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 152.94% beat Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s return on equity of 45.91%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    15.74% $2.86 $2.1B
    CMG
    Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
    20.31% $0.25 $7.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About EAT or CMG?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $191.05, signalling upside risk potential of 18.62%. On the other hand Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $44.47 which suggests that it could grow by 22.51%. Given that Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brinker International, Inc., analysts believe Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. is more attractive than Brinker International, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13 6 0
    CMG
    Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
    22 12 0
  • Is EAT or CMG More Risky?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.350, which suggesting that the stock is 34.98% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has a beta of 0.991, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.923%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAT or CMG?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brinker International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EAT or CMG?

    Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3B. Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $128.5M is lower than Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s net income of $330.9M. Notably, Brinker International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International, Inc. is 1.30x versus 4.09x for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    1.30x 16.27x $1.5B $128.5M
    CMG
    Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
    4.09x 31.76x $3B $330.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns EAT or DRI?

    Darden Restaurants, Inc. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to Brinker International, Inc.'s net margin of 7.65%. Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 152.94% beat Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s return on equity of 51.56%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    15.74% $2.86 $2.1B
    DRI
    Darden Restaurants, Inc.
    15.86% $2.03 $10.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About EAT or DRI?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $191.05, signalling upside risk potential of 18.62%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $222.34 which suggests that it could grow by 5.13%. Given that Brinker International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, Inc., analysts believe Brinker International, Inc. is more attractive than Darden Restaurants, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13 6 0
    DRI
    Darden Restaurants, Inc.
    17 12 1
  • Is EAT or DRI More Risky?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.350, which suggesting that the stock is 34.98% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants, Inc. has a beta of 0.643, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.658%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAT or DRI?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Darden Restaurants, Inc. offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Brinker International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants, Inc. pays out 63.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EAT or DRI?

    Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $128.5M is lower than Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s net income of $237.4M. Notably, Brinker International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International, Inc. is 1.30x versus 1.98x for Darden Restaurants, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    1.30x 16.27x $1.5B $128.5M
    DRI
    Darden Restaurants, Inc.
    1.98x 22.16x $3.1B $237.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns EAT or MCD?

    McDonald's Corp. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to Brinker International, Inc.'s net margin of 30.88%. Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 152.94% beat McDonald's Corp.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    15.74% $2.86 $2.1B
    MCD
    McDonald's Corp.
    55.77% $3.03 $52.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About EAT or MCD?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $191.05, signalling upside risk potential of 18.62%. On the other hand McDonald's Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $339.34 which suggests that it could grow by 3.59%. Given that Brinker International, Inc. has higher upside potential than McDonald's Corp., analysts believe Brinker International, Inc. is more attractive than McDonald's Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13 6 0
    MCD
    McDonald's Corp.
    17 15 2
  • Is EAT or MCD More Risky?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.350, which suggesting that the stock is 34.98% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McDonald's Corp. has a beta of 0.522, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.82%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAT or MCD?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McDonald's Corp. offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.86 per share. Brinker International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McDonald's Corp. pays out 59.99% of its earnings as a dividend. McDonald's Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EAT or MCD?

    Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than McDonald's Corp. quarterly revenues of $7B. Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $128.5M is lower than McDonald's Corp.'s net income of $2.2B. Notably, Brinker International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while McDonald's Corp.'s PE ratio is 27.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International, Inc. is 1.30x versus 8.73x for McDonald's Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    1.30x 16.27x $1.5B $128.5M
    MCD
    McDonald's Corp.
    8.73x 27.41x $7B $2.2B
  • Which has Higher Returns EAT or SBUX?

    Starbucks Corp. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to Brinker International, Inc.'s net margin of 2.96%. Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 152.94% beat Starbucks Corp.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    15.74% $2.86 $2.1B
    SBUX
    Starbucks Corp.
    15.63% $0.26 $17.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About EAT or SBUX?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $191.05, signalling upside risk potential of 18.62%. On the other hand Starbucks Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $100.16 which suggests that it could grow by 6.79%. Given that Brinker International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Starbucks Corp., analysts believe Brinker International, Inc. is more attractive than Starbucks Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13 6 0
    SBUX
    Starbucks Corp.
    13 14 3
  • Is EAT or SBUX More Risky?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.350, which suggesting that the stock is 34.98% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starbucks Corp. has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.075%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAT or SBUX?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Starbucks Corp. offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Brinker International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks Corp. pays out 149.81% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EAT or SBUX?

    Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Starbucks Corp. quarterly revenues of $9.9B. Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $128.5M is lower than Starbucks Corp.'s net income of $293.2M. Notably, Brinker International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Starbucks Corp.'s PE ratio is 78.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International, Inc. is 1.30x versus 2.84x for Starbucks Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    1.30x 16.27x $1.5B $128.5M
    SBUX
    Starbucks Corp.
    2.84x 78.14x $9.9B $293.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns EAT or SG?

    Sweetgreen, Inc. has a net margin of 8.85% compared to Brinker International, Inc.'s net margin of -20.97%. Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 152.94% beat Sweetgreen, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.26%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    15.74% $2.86 $2.1B
    SG
    Sweetgreen, Inc.
    2.44% -$0.31 $749.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About EAT or SG?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $191.05, signalling upside risk potential of 18.62%. On the other hand Sweetgreen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.07 which suggests that it could grow by 57.02%. Given that Sweetgreen, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brinker International, Inc., analysts believe Sweetgreen, Inc. is more attractive than Brinker International, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13 6 0
    SG
    Sweetgreen, Inc.
    2 10 1
  • Is EAT or SG More Risky?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.350, which suggesting that the stock is 34.98% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sweetgreen, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAT or SG?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sweetgreen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brinker International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sweetgreen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EAT or SG?

    Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Sweetgreen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $172.4M. Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $128.5M is higher than Sweetgreen, Inc.'s net income of -$36.1M. Notably, Brinker International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Sweetgreen, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International, Inc. is 1.30x versus 0.88x for Sweetgreen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    1.30x 16.27x $1.5B $128.5M
    SG
    Sweetgreen, Inc.
    0.88x -- $172.4M -$36.1M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?

Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…

Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?

Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…

Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…

Stock Ideas

Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Sell
43
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x

Sell
44
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x

Alerts

Buy
77
CPS alert for Feb 14

Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. [CPS] is up 32.06% over the past day.

Buy
58
TPH alert for Feb 14

Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. [TPH] is up 26.83% over the past day.

Sell
20
IRON alert for Feb 14

Disc Medicine, Inc. [IRON] is down 21.88% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock