Financhill
Buy
80

EAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$142.25
Seasonality move :
10.57%
Day range:
$138.32 - $145.45
52-week range:
$100.30 - $192.22
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
14.75x
P/S ratio:
1.17x
P/B ratio:
18.38x
Volume:
1.7M
Avg. volume:
2M
1-year change:
10.37%
Market cap:
$6.3B
Revenue:
$5.4B
EPS (TTM):
$9.64

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
$1.3B $1.77 3.13% -1.71% $162.82
CAVA
Cava Group, Inc.
$291.9M $0.13 17.15% -95.74% $67.79
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
$3B $0.29 4.02% -0.31% $43.18
DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
$3.1B $2.11 6.27% 15.83% $221.10
SG
Sweetgreen, Inc.
$177.8M -$0.11 -0.48% -2.96% $8.23
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
$1.4B $1.28 4.28% -11.59% $189.08
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
$142.24 $162.82 $6.3B 14.75x $0.00 0% 1.17x
CAVA
Cava Group, Inc.
$54.48 $67.79 $6.3B 46.96x $0.00 0% 5.70x
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
$34.15 $43.18 $45.2B 30.10x $0.00 0% 3.93x
DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
$176.26 $221.10 $20.5B 18.90x $1.50 3.29% 1.68x
SG
Sweetgreen, Inc.
$6.95 $8.23 $822.7M -- $0.00 0% 1.19x
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
$169.00 $189.08 $11.2B 25.81x $0.68 1.61% 1.93x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
84.11% 1.733 32.37% 0.15x
CAVA
Cava Group, Inc.
36.57% 1.107 6.33% 2.50x
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
60.72% 0.304 9.59% 1.32x
DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
78.27% -0.224 33.28% 0.14x
SG
Sweetgreen, Inc.
47.54% -0.611 37.73% 1.18x
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
39% 1.254 8.47% 0.25x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
$176M $118.8M 21.74% 198.61% 8.81% $62.2M
CAVA
Cava Group, Inc.
$54.7M $23.2M 12.28% 19.32% 7.95% $102.2M
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
$645.1M $498.3M 18.77% 43.88% 16.59% $406.2M
DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
$488.6M $303.4M 11.11% 50.27% 9.97% $162.9M
SG
Sweetgreen, Inc.
$4.2M -$26.7M -14.81% -26.26% -15.48% -$38.8M
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
$158.9M $104.5M 19.42% 31.71% 7.28% $14.7M

Brinker International, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns EAT or CAVA?

    Cava Group, Inc. has a net margin of 7.38% compared to Brinker International, Inc.'s net margin of 5.05%. Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 198.61% beat Cava Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.32%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13.05% $2.17 $2.2B
    CAVA
    Cava Group, Inc.
    18.73% $0.12 $1.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About EAT or CAVA?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $162.82, signalling upside risk potential of 14.47%. On the other hand Cava Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $67.79 which suggests that it could grow by 24.43%. Given that Cava Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brinker International, Inc., analysts believe Cava Group, Inc. is more attractive than Brinker International, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    11 9 0
    CAVA
    Cava Group, Inc.
    10 9 0
  • Is EAT or CAVA More Risky?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.346, which suggesting that the stock is 34.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cava Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAT or CAVA?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cava Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brinker International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cava Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EAT or CAVA?

    Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Cava Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $292.2M. Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $99.5M is higher than Cava Group, Inc.'s net income of $14.7M. Notably, Brinker International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.75x while Cava Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 46.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International, Inc. is 1.17x versus 5.70x for Cava Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    1.17x 14.75x $1.3B $99.5M
    CAVA
    Cava Group, Inc.
    5.70x 46.96x $292.2M $14.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns EAT or CMG?

    Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has a net margin of 7.38% compared to Brinker International, Inc.'s net margin of 12.72%. Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 198.61% beat Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s return on equity of 43.88%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13.05% $2.17 $2.2B
    CMG
    Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
    21.48% $0.29 $8.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About EAT or CMG?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $162.82, signalling upside risk potential of 14.47%. On the other hand Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $43.18 which suggests that it could grow by 26.45%. Given that Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brinker International, Inc., analysts believe Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. is more attractive than Brinker International, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    11 9 0
    CMG
    Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
    21 10 0
  • Is EAT or CMG More Risky?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.346, which suggesting that the stock is 34.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has a beta of 0.991, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.885%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAT or CMG?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brinker International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EAT or CMG?

    Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3B. Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $99.5M is lower than Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s net income of $382.1M. Notably, Brinker International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.75x while Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International, Inc. is 1.17x versus 3.93x for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    1.17x 14.75x $1.3B $99.5M
    CMG
    Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
    3.93x 30.10x $3B $382.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns EAT or DRI?

    Darden Restaurants, Inc. has a net margin of 7.38% compared to Brinker International, Inc.'s net margin of 8.47%. Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 198.61% beat Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s return on equity of 50.27%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13.05% $2.17 $2.2B
    DRI
    Darden Restaurants, Inc.
    16.05% $2.19 $10.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About EAT or DRI?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $162.82, signalling upside risk potential of 14.47%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $221.10 which suggests that it could grow by 25.44%. Given that Darden Restaurants, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brinker International, Inc., analysts believe Darden Restaurants, Inc. is more attractive than Brinker International, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    11 9 0
    DRI
    Darden Restaurants, Inc.
    16 12 0
  • Is EAT or DRI More Risky?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.346, which suggesting that the stock is 34.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants, Inc. has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.605%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAT or DRI?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Darden Restaurants, Inc. offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Brinker International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants, Inc. pays out 63.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EAT or DRI?

    Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3B. Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $99.5M is lower than Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s net income of $257.9M. Notably, Brinker International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.75x while Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International, Inc. is 1.17x versus 1.68x for Darden Restaurants, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    1.17x 14.75x $1.3B $99.5M
    DRI
    Darden Restaurants, Inc.
    1.68x 18.90x $3B $257.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns EAT or SG?

    Sweetgreen, Inc. has a net margin of 7.38% compared to Brinker International, Inc.'s net margin of -20.97%. Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 198.61% beat Sweetgreen, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.26%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13.05% $2.17 $2.2B
    SG
    Sweetgreen, Inc.
    2.44% -$0.31 $749.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About EAT or SG?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $162.82, signalling upside risk potential of 14.47%. On the other hand Sweetgreen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.23 which suggests that it could grow by 18.41%. Given that Sweetgreen, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brinker International, Inc., analysts believe Sweetgreen, Inc. is more attractive than Brinker International, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    11 9 0
    SG
    Sweetgreen, Inc.
    4 8 1
  • Is EAT or SG More Risky?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.346, which suggesting that the stock is 34.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sweetgreen, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAT or SG?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sweetgreen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brinker International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sweetgreen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EAT or SG?

    Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Sweetgreen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $172.4M. Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $99.5M is higher than Sweetgreen, Inc.'s net income of -$36.1M. Notably, Brinker International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.75x while Sweetgreen, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International, Inc. is 1.17x versus 1.19x for Sweetgreen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    1.17x 14.75x $1.3B $99.5M
    SG
    Sweetgreen, Inc.
    1.19x -- $172.4M -$36.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns EAT or TXRH?

    Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a net margin of 7.38% compared to Brinker International, Inc.'s net margin of 5.91%. Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 198.61% beat Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.71%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13.05% $2.17 $2.2B
    TXRH
    Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
    11.06% $1.25 $2.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About EAT or TXRH?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $162.82, signalling upside risk potential of 14.47%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $189.08 which suggests that it could grow by 11.88%. Given that Brinker International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, Inc., analysts believe Brinker International, Inc. is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    11 9 0
    TXRH
    Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
    11 18 0
  • Is EAT or TXRH More Risky?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.346, which suggesting that the stock is 34.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a beta of 0.880, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.037%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAT or TXRH?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Brinker International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. pays out 37.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EAT or TXRH?

    Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Texas Roadhouse, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $99.5M is higher than Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s net income of $84.9M. Notably, Brinker International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.75x while Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International, Inc. is 1.17x versus 1.93x for Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    1.17x 14.75x $1.3B $99.5M
    TXRH
    Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
    1.93x 25.81x $1.4B $84.9M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…

How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Sell
44
PSTG alert for Dec 5

Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.

Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.

Buy
69
ASTS alert for Dec 5

AST Spacemobile, Inc. [ASTS] is up 18.25% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock