Financhill
Buy
65

EAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$162.82
Seasonality move :
9.17%
Day range:
$158.16 - $163.04
52-week range:
$100.30 - $192.22
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
16.88x
P/S ratio:
1.34x
P/B ratio:
21.03x
Volume:
1.1M
Avg. volume:
1M
1-year change:
5.34%
Market cap:
$7.2B
Revenue:
$5.4B
EPS (TTM):
$9.64

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
$1.5B $2.92 2.94% 12.75% $179.05
BROS
Dutch Bros, Inc.
$449.1M $0.18 26.47% 42.39% $76.84
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
$3B $0.24 7.1% -3.09% $45.03
DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
$3.3B $2.95 5.58% 7.62% $222.03
SG
Sweetgreen, Inc.
$159.4M -$0.26 7.69% -19.17% $8.02
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
$1.5B $1.51 11.76% 1.62% $194.46
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
$162.77 $179.05 $7.2B 16.88x $0.00 0% 1.34x
BROS
Dutch Bros, Inc.
$60.97 $76.84 $7.7B 122.50x $0.00 0% 4.87x
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
$40.87 $45.03 $54B 36.02x $0.00 0% 4.70x
DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
$206.17 $222.03 $23.7B 21.61x $1.50 2.86% 1.93x
SG
Sweetgreen, Inc.
$7.16 $8.02 $847.6M -- $0.00 0% 1.23x
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
$190.65 $194.46 $12.6B 29.12x $0.68 1.43% 2.18x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
84.11% 1.939 32.37% 0.15x
BROS
Dutch Bros, Inc.
61.22% 1.196 15.12% 1.25x
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
60.72% 0.274 9.59% 1.32x
DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
79.99% -0.087 40.16% 0.14x
SG
Sweetgreen, Inc.
47.54% -1.192 37.73% 1.18x
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
39% 1.065 8.47% 0.25x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
$176M $118.8M 21.74% 198.61% 8.81% $62.2M
BROS
Dutch Bros, Inc.
$105.9M $41.5M 5.3% 11.78% 9.8% $18.9M
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
$645.1M $498.3M 18.77% 43.88% 16.59% $406.2M
DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
$492.1M $341.1M 11.04% 51.56% 11% $112.3M
SG
Sweetgreen, Inc.
$4.2M -$26.7M -14.81% -26.26% -15.48% -$38.8M
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
$158.9M $104.5M 19.42% 31.71% 7.28% $14.7M

Brinker International, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns EAT or BROS?

    Dutch Bros, Inc. has a net margin of 7.38% compared to Brinker International, Inc.'s net margin of 6.44%. Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 198.61% beat Dutch Bros, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.78%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13.05% $2.17 $2.2B
    BROS
    Dutch Bros, Inc.
    24.99% $0.14 $1.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About EAT or BROS?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $179.05, signalling upside risk potential of 10%. On the other hand Dutch Bros, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $76.84 which suggests that it could grow by 26.03%. Given that Dutch Bros, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brinker International, Inc., analysts believe Dutch Bros, Inc. is more attractive than Brinker International, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13 6 0
    BROS
    Dutch Bros, Inc.
    14 2 0
  • Is EAT or BROS More Risky?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 33.972% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dutch Bros, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAT or BROS?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dutch Bros, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brinker International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dutch Bros, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EAT or BROS?

    Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Dutch Bros, Inc. quarterly revenues of $423.6M. Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $99.5M is higher than Dutch Bros, Inc.'s net income of $27.3M. Notably, Brinker International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.88x while Dutch Bros, Inc.'s PE ratio is 122.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International, Inc. is 1.34x versus 4.87x for Dutch Bros, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    1.34x 16.88x $1.3B $99.5M
    BROS
    Dutch Bros, Inc.
    4.87x 122.50x $423.6M $27.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns EAT or CMG?

    Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has a net margin of 7.38% compared to Brinker International, Inc.'s net margin of 12.72%. Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 198.61% beat Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s return on equity of 43.88%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13.05% $2.17 $2.2B
    CMG
    Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
    21.48% $0.29 $8.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About EAT or CMG?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $179.05, signalling upside risk potential of 10%. On the other hand Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $45.03 which suggests that it could grow by 10.18%. Given that Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brinker International, Inc., analysts believe Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. is more attractive than Brinker International, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13 6 0
    CMG
    Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
    22 11 0
  • Is EAT or CMG More Risky?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 33.972% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has a beta of 0.974, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.612%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAT or CMG?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brinker International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EAT or CMG?

    Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3B. Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $99.5M is lower than Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s net income of $382.1M. Notably, Brinker International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.88x while Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International, Inc. is 1.34x versus 4.70x for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    1.34x 16.88x $1.3B $99.5M
    CMG
    Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
    4.70x 36.02x $3B $382.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns EAT or DRI?

    Darden Restaurants, Inc. has a net margin of 7.38% compared to Brinker International, Inc.'s net margin of 7.65%. Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 198.61% beat Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s return on equity of 51.56%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13.05% $2.17 $2.2B
    DRI
    Darden Restaurants, Inc.
    15.86% $2.03 $10.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About EAT or DRI?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $179.05, signalling upside risk potential of 10%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $222.03 which suggests that it could grow by 7.04%. Given that Brinker International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, Inc., analysts believe Brinker International, Inc. is more attractive than Darden Restaurants, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13 6 0
    DRI
    Darden Restaurants, Inc.
    17 12 1
  • Is EAT or DRI More Risky?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 33.972% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants, Inc. has a beta of 0.645, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.524%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAT or DRI?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Darden Restaurants, Inc. offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Brinker International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants, Inc. pays out 63.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EAT or DRI?

    Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $99.5M is lower than Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s net income of $237.4M. Notably, Brinker International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.88x while Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International, Inc. is 1.34x versus 1.93x for Darden Restaurants, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    1.34x 16.88x $1.3B $99.5M
    DRI
    Darden Restaurants, Inc.
    1.93x 21.61x $3.1B $237.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns EAT or SG?

    Sweetgreen, Inc. has a net margin of 7.38% compared to Brinker International, Inc.'s net margin of -20.97%. Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 198.61% beat Sweetgreen, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.26%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13.05% $2.17 $2.2B
    SG
    Sweetgreen, Inc.
    2.44% -$0.31 $749.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About EAT or SG?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $179.05, signalling upside risk potential of 10%. On the other hand Sweetgreen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.02 which suggests that it could grow by 12.02%. Given that Sweetgreen, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brinker International, Inc., analysts believe Sweetgreen, Inc. is more attractive than Brinker International, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13 6 0
    SG
    Sweetgreen, Inc.
    2 10 1
  • Is EAT or SG More Risky?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 33.972% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sweetgreen, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAT or SG?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sweetgreen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brinker International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sweetgreen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EAT or SG?

    Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Sweetgreen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $172.4M. Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $99.5M is higher than Sweetgreen, Inc.'s net income of -$36.1M. Notably, Brinker International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.88x while Sweetgreen, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International, Inc. is 1.34x versus 1.23x for Sweetgreen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    1.34x 16.88x $1.3B $99.5M
    SG
    Sweetgreen, Inc.
    1.23x -- $172.4M -$36.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns EAT or TXRH?

    Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a net margin of 7.38% compared to Brinker International, Inc.'s net margin of 5.91%. Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 198.61% beat Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.71%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13.05% $2.17 $2.2B
    TXRH
    Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
    11.06% $1.25 $2.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About EAT or TXRH?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $179.05, signalling upside risk potential of 10%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $194.46 which suggests that it could grow by 2%. Given that Brinker International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, Inc., analysts believe Brinker International, Inc. is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    13 6 0
    TXRH
    Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
    14 16 0
  • Is EAT or TXRH More Risky?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 33.972% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.233%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EAT or TXRH?

    Brinker International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Brinker International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. pays out 37.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EAT or TXRH?

    Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Texas Roadhouse, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $99.5M is higher than Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s net income of $84.9M. Notably, Brinker International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.88x while Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International, Inc. is 1.34x versus 2.18x for Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EAT
    Brinker International, Inc.
    1.34x 16.88x $1.3B $99.5M
    TXRH
    Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
    2.18x 29.12x $1.4B $84.9M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Did AMD Stock Go Up?
Why Did AMD Stock Go Up?

Since January 9th, shares of chipmaker AMD (NASDAQ:AMD) have been…

Will Data Centers Be In Space?
Will Data Centers Be In Space?

With demand for data centers seemingly growing by the day,…

Why Did SoundHound AI Stock Go Up?
Why Did SoundHound AI Stock Go Up?

SoundHound AI (NASDAQ:SOUN) has moved higher in recent days, breaking…

Stock Ideas

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x

Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Sell
47
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Alerts

Buy
56
INTC alert for Jan 24

Intel Corp. [INTC] is down 17.01% over the past day.

Buy
64
BNR alert for Jan 24

Burning Rock Biotech Ltd. [BNR] is down 12.81% over the past day.

Sell
19
APGE alert for Jan 24

Apogee Therapeutics, Inc. [APGE] is down 12.28% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock