SG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chipotle Mexican Grill has a net margin of -12% compared to Sweetgreen's net margin of 13.87%. Sweetgreen's return on equity of -18.6% beat Chipotle Mexican Grill's return on equity of 44.62%.

Sweetgreen has a consensus price target of $37.20, signalling upside risk potential of 18.52%. On the other hand Chipotle Mexican Grill has an analysts' consensus of $58.95 which suggests that it could grow by 6.09%. Given that Sweetgreen has higher upside potential than Chipotle Mexican Grill, analysts believe Sweetgreen is more attractive than Chipotle Mexican Grill.

Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.001%.

Sweetgreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chipotle Mexican Grill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sweetgreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chipotle Mexican Grill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sweetgreen quarterly revenues are $173.4M, which are smaller than Chipotle Mexican Grill quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Sweetgreen's net income of -$20.8M is lower than Chipotle Mexican Grill's net income of $387.4M. Notably, Sweetgreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chipotle Mexican Grill's PE ratio is 57.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sweetgreen is 5.95x versus 7.77x for Chipotle Mexican Grill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Noodles & has a net margin of -12% compared to Sweetgreen's net margin of -5.5%. Sweetgreen's return on equity of -18.6% beat Noodles &'s return on equity of -171.96%.

Sweetgreen has a consensus price target of $37.20, signalling upside risk potential of 18.52%. On the other hand Noodles & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 316.73%. Given that Noodles & has higher upside potential than Sweetgreen, analysts believe Noodles & is more attractive than Sweetgreen.

Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noodles & has a beta of 1.573, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.318%.

Sweetgreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Noodles & offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sweetgreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noodles & pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sweetgreen quarterly revenues are $173.4M, which are larger than Noodles & quarterly revenues of $122.8M. Sweetgreen's net income of -$20.8M is lower than Noodles &'s net income of -$6.8M. Notably, Sweetgreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Noodles &'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sweetgreen is 5.95x versus 0.07x for Noodles &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shake Shack has a net margin of -12% compared to Sweetgreen's net margin of -3.22%. Sweetgreen's return on equity of -18.6% beat Shake Shack's return on equity of 1.86%.

Sweetgreen has a consensus price target of $37.20, signalling upside risk potential of 18.52%. On the other hand Shake Shack has an analysts' consensus of $131.86 which suggests that it could grow by 2.32%. Given that Sweetgreen has higher upside potential than Shake Shack, analysts believe Sweetgreen is more attractive than Shake Shack.

Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shake Shack has a beta of 1.853, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.301%.

Sweetgreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shake Shack offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sweetgreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shake Shack pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sweetgreen quarterly revenues are $173.4M, which are smaller than Shake Shack quarterly revenues of $316.9M. Sweetgreen's net income of -$20.8M is lower than Shake Shack's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Sweetgreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Shake Shack's PE ratio is 758.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sweetgreen is 5.95x versus 4.44x for Shake Shack. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of -12% compared to Sweetgreen's net margin of 15.84%. Sweetgreen's return on equity of -18.6% beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

Sweetgreen has a consensus price target of $37.20, signalling upside risk potential of 18.52%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $342.78 which suggests that it could grow by 25.14%. Given that Wingstop has higher upside potential than Sweetgreen, analysts believe Wingstop is more attractive than Sweetgreen.

Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 1.785, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.483%.

Sweetgreen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Sweetgreen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 35.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sweetgreen quarterly revenues are $173.4M, which are larger than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $162.5M. Sweetgreen's net income of -$20.8M is lower than Wingstop's net income of $25.7M. Notably, Sweetgreen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wingstop's PE ratio is 84.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sweetgreen is 5.95x versus 14.47x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.