LOCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brinker International has a net margin of 5.14% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 3.38%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 9.49% beat Brinker International's return on equity of --.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.48%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $118.69 which suggests that it could fall by -11.6%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Brinker International.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.448, which suggesting that the stock is 44.755% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.520, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.993%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $120.4M, which are smaller than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6.2M is lower than Brinker International's net income of $38.5M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.71x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 32.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.76x versus 1.35x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kura Sushi USA has a net margin of 5.14% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of -0.89%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 9.49% beat Kura Sushi USA's return on equity of -0.41%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.48%. On the other hand Kura Sushi USA has an analysts' consensus of $104.75 which suggests that it could grow by 12.13%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Kura Sushi USA, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Kura Sushi USA.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.448, which suggesting that the stock is 44.755% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 1.801, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.126%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kura Sushi USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kura Sushi USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $120.4M, which are larger than Kura Sushi USA quarterly revenues of $63.1M. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6.2M is higher than Kura Sushi USA's net income of -$558K. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.71x while Kura Sushi USA's PE ratio is 771.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.76x versus 4.40x for Kura Sushi USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse has a net margin of 5.14% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 6.63%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 9.49% beat Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 31.98%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.48%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse has an analysts' consensus of $153.43 which suggests that it could grow by 8.57%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.448, which suggesting that the stock is 44.755% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.616%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Texas Roadhouse offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse pays out 48.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $120.4M, which are smaller than Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues of $1.3B. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6.2M is lower than Texas Roadhouse's net income of $84.4M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.71x while Texas Roadhouse's PE ratio is 31.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.76x versus 2.38x for Texas Roadhouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 5.14% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 20.92%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 9.49% beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.48%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $145.81 which suggests that it could grow by 8.69%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Yum Brands, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Yum Brands.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.448, which suggesting that the stock is 44.755% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.305%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 42.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $120.4M, which are smaller than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $1.8B. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6.2M is lower than Yum Brands's net income of $382M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.71x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 24.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.76x versus 5.22x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.