RRGB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. has a net margin of -3.76% compared to Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s net margin of 0.15%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.89%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.13, signalling upside risk potential of 230.12%. On the other hand Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $33.50 which suggests that it could grow by 19.69%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. is more attractive than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc..

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has a beta of 2.227, which suggesting that the stock is 122.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. has a beta of 1.248, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.805%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. pays out 48.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. quarterly revenues are $269M, which are smaller than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. quarterly revenues of $874.8M. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s net income of -$10.1M is lower than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M. Notably, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.'s PE ratio is 41.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. is 0.05x versus 0.19x for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a net margin of -3.76% compared to Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s net margin of -5.56%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.13, signalling upside risk potential of 230.12%. On the other hand Dine Brands Global, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $31.40 which suggests that it could grow by 12.42%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dine Brands Global, Inc., analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. is more attractive than Dine Brands Global, Inc..

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has a beta of 2.227, which suggesting that the stock is 122.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.963, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.742%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dine Brands Global, Inc. offers a yield of 6.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global, Inc. pays out 153.72% of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. quarterly revenues are $269M, which are larger than Dine Brands Global, Inc. quarterly revenues of $217.6M. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s net income of -$10.1M is higher than Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net income of -$12.1M. Notably, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. is 0.05x versus 0.46x for Dine Brands Global, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. has a net margin of -3.76% compared to Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s net margin of -4.17%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.76%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.13, signalling upside risk potential of 230.12%. On the other hand Kura Sushi USA, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $76.20 which suggests that it could grow by 32.32%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kura Sushi USA, Inc., analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. is more attractive than Kura Sushi USA, Inc..

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has a beta of 2.227, which suggesting that the stock is 122.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kura Sushi USA, Inc. has a beta of 1.677, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.662%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kura Sushi USA, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kura Sushi USA, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. quarterly revenues are $269M, which are larger than Kura Sushi USA, Inc. quarterly revenues of $73.5M. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s net income of -$10.1M is lower than Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s net income of -$3.1M. Notably, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s PE ratio is 732.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. is 0.05x versus 2.41x for Kura Sushi USA, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a net margin of -3.76% compared to Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s net margin of 5.85%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.8%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.13, signalling upside risk potential of 230.12%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $197.42 which suggests that it could grow by 15.97%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, Inc., analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse, Inc..

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has a beta of 2.227, which suggesting that the stock is 122.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.084%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. pays out 44.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. quarterly revenues are $269M, which are smaller than Texas Roadhouse, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s net income of -$10.1M is lower than Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s net income of $86.7M. Notably, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. is 0.05x versus 1.93x for Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.