DIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Darden Restaurants, Inc. has a net margin of 3.23% compared to Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net margin of 7.65%. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s return on equity of 51.56%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling downside risk potential of -21.09%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $220.13 which suggests that it could grow by 15.92%. Given that Darden Restaurants, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dine Brands Global, Inc., analysts believe Darden Restaurants, Inc. is more attractive than Dine Brands Global, Inc..

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants, Inc. has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.605%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. Darden Restaurants, Inc. offers a yield of 3.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Dine Brands Global, Inc. pays 48.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants, Inc. pays out 63.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $216.2M, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net income of $7M is lower than Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s net income of $237.4M. Notably, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.60x while Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global, Inc. is 0.56x versus 1.78x for Darden Restaurants, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. has a net margin of 3.23% compared to Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net margin of 2.86%. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.89%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling downside risk potential of -21.09%. On the other hand Kura Sushi USA, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $75.44 which suggests that it could grow by 36.03%. Given that Kura Sushi USA, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dine Brands Global, Inc., analysts believe Kura Sushi USA, Inc. is more attractive than Dine Brands Global, Inc..

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kura Sushi USA, Inc. has a beta of 1.712, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.207%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. Kura Sushi USA, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dine Brands Global, Inc. pays 48.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Kura Sushi USA, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $216.2M, which are larger than Kura Sushi USA, Inc. quarterly revenues of $79.4M. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net income of $7M is higher than Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s net income of $2.3M. Notably, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.60x while Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s PE ratio is 732.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global, Inc. is 0.56x versus 2.36x for Kura Sushi USA, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sweetgreen, Inc. has a net margin of 3.23% compared to Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net margin of -20.97%. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Sweetgreen, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.26%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling downside risk potential of -21.09%. On the other hand Sweetgreen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.06 which suggests that it could grow by 14.85%. Given that Sweetgreen, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dine Brands Global, Inc., analysts believe Sweetgreen, Inc. is more attractive than Dine Brands Global, Inc..

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sweetgreen, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. Sweetgreen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dine Brands Global, Inc. pays 48.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Sweetgreen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $216.2M, which are larger than Sweetgreen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $172.4M. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net income of $7M is higher than Sweetgreen, Inc.'s net income of -$36.1M. Notably, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.60x while Sweetgreen, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global, Inc. is 0.56x versus 1.20x for Sweetgreen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a net margin of 3.23% compared to Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net margin of 5.91%. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.71%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling downside risk potential of -21.09%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $190.48 which suggests that it could grow by 11.52%. Given that Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dine Brands Global, Inc., analysts believe Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is more attractive than Dine Brands Global, Inc..

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a beta of 0.880, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.037%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.27%. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Dine Brands Global, Inc. pays 48.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. pays out 37.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $216.2M, which are smaller than Texas Roadhouse, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net income of $7M is lower than Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s net income of $84.9M. Notably, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.60x while Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global, Inc. is 0.56x versus 1.95x for Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.