DIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brinker International, Inc. has a net margin of 3.23% compared to Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net margin of 7.38%. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 198.61%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.00, signalling downside risk potential of -17.13%. On the other hand Brinker International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $162.82 which suggests that it could grow by 14.47%. Given that Brinker International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dine Brands Global, Inc., analysts believe Brinker International, Inc. is more attractive than Dine Brands Global, Inc..

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.346, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.643%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.26%. Brinker International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dine Brands Global, Inc. pays 48.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $216.2M, which are smaller than Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net income of $7M is lower than Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $99.5M. Notably, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.57x while Brinker International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global, Inc. is 0.56x versus 1.17x for Brinker International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. has a net margin of 3.23% compared to Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net margin of 2.86%. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.89%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.00, signalling downside risk potential of -17.13%. On the other hand Kura Sushi USA, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $75.44 which suggests that it could grow by 37.32%. Given that Kura Sushi USA, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dine Brands Global, Inc., analysts believe Kura Sushi USA, Inc. is more attractive than Dine Brands Global, Inc..

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kura Sushi USA, Inc. has a beta of 1.712, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.207%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.26%. Kura Sushi USA, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dine Brands Global, Inc. pays 48.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Kura Sushi USA, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $216.2M, which are larger than Kura Sushi USA, Inc. quarterly revenues of $79.4M. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net income of $7M is higher than Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s net income of $2.3M. Notably, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.57x while Kura Sushi USA, Inc.'s PE ratio is 732.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global, Inc. is 0.56x versus 2.34x for Kura Sushi USA, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sweetgreen, Inc. has a net margin of 3.23% compared to Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net margin of -20.97%. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Sweetgreen, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.26%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.00, signalling downside risk potential of -17.13%. On the other hand Sweetgreen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.23 which suggests that it could grow by 19.26%. Given that Sweetgreen, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dine Brands Global, Inc., analysts believe Sweetgreen, Inc. is more attractive than Dine Brands Global, Inc..

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sweetgreen, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.26%. Sweetgreen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dine Brands Global, Inc. pays 48.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Sweetgreen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $216.2M, which are larger than Sweetgreen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $172.4M. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net income of $7M is higher than Sweetgreen, Inc.'s net income of -$36.1M. Notably, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.57x while Sweetgreen, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global, Inc. is 0.56x versus 1.18x for Sweetgreen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a net margin of 3.23% compared to Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net margin of 5.91%. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.71%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.00, signalling downside risk potential of -17.13%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $189.16 which suggests that it could grow by 13.18%. Given that Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dine Brands Global, Inc., analysts believe Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is more attractive than Dine Brands Global, Inc..

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has a beta of 0.880, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.037%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.26%. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Dine Brands Global, Inc. pays 48.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse, Inc. pays out 37.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $216.2M, which are smaller than Texas Roadhouse, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net income of $7M is lower than Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s net income of $84.9M. Notably, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.57x while Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global, Inc. is 0.56x versus 1.91x for Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.