DIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheesecake Factory, Inc. has a net margin of 3.23% compared to Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net margin of 3.52%. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Cheesecake Factory, Inc.'s return on equity of 40.09%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.25, signalling upside risk potential of 7.94%. On the other hand Cheesecake Factory, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $60.61 which suggests that it could grow by 3.31%. Given that Dine Brands Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cheesecake Factory, Inc., analysts believe Dine Brands Global, Inc. is more attractive than Cheesecake Factory, Inc..

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.164% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheesecake Factory, Inc. has a beta of 1.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.577%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.42%. Cheesecake Factory, Inc. offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Dine Brands Global, Inc. pays 48.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheesecake Factory, Inc. pays out 33.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $216.2M, which are smaller than Cheesecake Factory, Inc. quarterly revenues of $907.2M. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net income of $7M is lower than Cheesecake Factory, Inc.'s net income of $31.9M. Notably, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.19x while Cheesecake Factory, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global, Inc. is 0.54x versus 0.77x for Cheesecake Factory, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. has a net margin of 3.23% compared to Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net margin of -3.09%. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.74%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.25, signalling upside risk potential of 7.94%. On the other hand Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $29.13 which suggests that it could fall by -7.25%. Given that Dine Brands Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., analysts believe Dine Brands Global, Inc. is more attractive than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc..

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.164% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. has a beta of 1.289, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.905%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.42%. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Dine Brands Global, Inc. pays 48.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. pays out 48.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $216.2M, which are smaller than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. quarterly revenues of $797.2M. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net income of $7M is higher than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.'s net income of -$24.6M. Notably, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.19x while Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.'s PE ratio is 42.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global, Inc. is 0.54x versus 0.21x for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Darden Restaurants, Inc. has a net margin of 3.23% compared to Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net margin of 7.65%. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s return on equity of 51.56%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.25, signalling upside risk potential of 7.94%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $222.34 which suggests that it could grow by 5.13%. Given that Dine Brands Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, Inc., analysts believe Dine Brands Global, Inc. is more attractive than Darden Restaurants, Inc..

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.164% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants, Inc. has a beta of 0.643, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.658%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.42%. Darden Restaurants, Inc. offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Dine Brands Global, Inc. pays 48.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants, Inc. pays out 63.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $216.2M, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net income of $7M is lower than Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s net income of $237.4M. Notably, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.19x while Darden Restaurants, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global, Inc. is 0.54x versus 1.98x for Darden Restaurants, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International, Inc. has a net margin of 3.23% compared to Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net margin of 8.85%. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Brinker International, Inc.'s return on equity of 152.94%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $34.25, signalling upside risk potential of 7.94%. On the other hand Brinker International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $191.05 which suggests that it could grow by 18.62%. Given that Brinker International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dine Brands Global, Inc., analysts believe Brinker International, Inc. is more attractive than Dine Brands Global, Inc..

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.164% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International, Inc. has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.98%.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.42%. Brinker International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dine Brands Global, Inc. pays 48.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $216.2M, which are smaller than Brinker International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s net income of $7M is lower than Brinker International, Inc.'s net income of $128.5M. Notably, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.19x while Brinker International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global, Inc. is 0.54x versus 1.30x for Brinker International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.