AJG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CorVel Corp. has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s net margin of 11.65%. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s return on equity of 7.95% beat CorVel Corp.'s return on equity of 32.69%.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a consensus price target of $301.28, signalling upside risk potential of 14.49%. On the other hand CorVel Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has higher upside potential than CorVel Corp., analysts believe Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. is more attractive than CorVel Corp..

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a beta of 0.688, which suggesting that the stock is 31.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CorVel Corp. has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.093%.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. CorVel Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. pays 36.92% of its earnings as a dividend. CorVel Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than CorVel Corp. quarterly revenues of $239.6M. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s net income of $273.6M is higher than CorVel Corp.'s net income of $27.9M. Notably, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.47x while CorVel Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. is 5.06x versus 3.78x for CorVel Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

eHealth, Inc. has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s net margin of -58.83%. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s return on equity of 7.95% beat eHealth, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.62%.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a consensus price target of $301.28, signalling upside risk potential of 14.49%. On the other hand eHealth, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 104.33%. Given that eHealth, Inc. has higher upside potential than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., analysts believe eHealth, Inc. is more attractive than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co..

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a beta of 0.688, which suggesting that the stock is 31.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eHealth, Inc. has a beta of 1.271, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.113%.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. eHealth, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. pays 36.92% of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth, Inc. pays out -55.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than eHealth, Inc. quarterly revenues of $53.9M. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s net income of $273.6M is higher than eHealth, Inc.'s net income of -$31.7M. Notably, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.47x while eHealth, Inc.'s PE ratio is 112.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. is 5.06x versus 0.23x for eHealth, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingstone Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s net margin of 21.42%. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s return on equity of 7.95% beat Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 38.25%.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a consensus price target of $301.28, signalling upside risk potential of 14.49%. On the other hand Kingstone Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.93%. Given that Kingstone Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., analysts believe Kingstone Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Arthur J. Gallagher & Co..

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a beta of 0.688, which suggesting that the stock is 31.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingstone Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.420, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.043%.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. Kingstone Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. pays 36.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingstone Cos., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Kingstone Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.8M. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s net income of $273.6M is higher than Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s net income of $10.9M. Notably, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.47x while Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. is 5.06x versus 1.36x for Kingstone Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s net margin of 11.89%. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s return on equity of 7.95% beat Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77%.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a consensus price target of $301.28, signalling upside risk potential of 14.49%. On the other hand Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $211.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.68%. Given that Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has higher upside potential than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., analysts believe Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. is more attractive than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc..

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a beta of 0.688, which suggesting that the stock is 31.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.514%.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. pays 36.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays out 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s net income of $273.6M is lower than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M. Notably, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.47x while Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. is 5.06x versus 3.48x for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.