BRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CorVel Corp. has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of 11.65%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39% beat CorVel Corp.'s return on equity of 32.69%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $92.71, signalling upside risk potential of 15.95%. On the other hand CorVel Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brown & Brown, Inc. has higher upside potential than CorVel Corp., analysts believe Brown & Brown, Inc. is more attractive than CorVel Corp..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.816, which suggesting that the stock is 18.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CorVel Corp. has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.093%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. CorVel Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. CorVel Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than CorVel Corp. quarterly revenues of $239.6M. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M is higher than CorVel Corp.'s net income of $27.9M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.28x while CorVel Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 4.41x versus 3.83x for CorVel Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

eHealth, Inc. has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of -58.83%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39% beat eHealth, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.62%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $92.71, signalling upside risk potential of 15.95%. On the other hand eHealth, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 104.82%. Given that eHealth, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, Inc., analysts believe eHealth, Inc. is more attractive than Brown & Brown, Inc..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.816, which suggesting that the stock is 18.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eHealth, Inc. has a beta of 1.271, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.113%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. eHealth, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth, Inc. pays out -55.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than eHealth, Inc. quarterly revenues of $53.9M. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M is higher than eHealth, Inc.'s net income of -$31.7M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.28x while eHealth, Inc.'s PE ratio is 111.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 4.41x versus 0.23x for eHealth, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingstone Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of 21.42%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39% beat Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 38.25%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $92.71, signalling upside risk potential of 15.95%. On the other hand Kingstone Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.58%. Given that Kingstone Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, Inc., analysts believe Kingstone Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Brown & Brown, Inc..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.816, which suggesting that the stock is 18.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingstone Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.420, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.043%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Kingstone Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingstone Cos., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Kingstone Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.8M. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M is higher than Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s net income of $10.9M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.28x while Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 4.41x versus 1.35x for Kingstone Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of 11.89%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39% beat Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $92.71, signalling upside risk potential of 15.95%. On the other hand Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $211.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.68%. Given that Brown & Brown, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., analysts believe Brown & Brown, Inc. is more attractive than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.816, which suggesting that the stock is 18.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.514%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays out 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M is lower than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.28x while Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 4.41x versus 3.48x for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.