BRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of -8.28%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39% beat Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.3%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $91.14, signalling upside risk potential of 13.02%. On the other hand Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $33.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.73%. Given that Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, Inc., analysts believe Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is more attractive than Brown & Brown, Inc..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.603%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $365.4M. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M is higher than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of -$30.2M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.20x while Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 4.39x versus 1.18x for Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CorVel Corp. has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of 11.65%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39% beat CorVel Corp.'s return on equity of 32.69%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $91.14, signalling upside risk potential of 13.02%. On the other hand CorVel Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brown & Brown, Inc. has higher upside potential than CorVel Corp., analysts believe Brown & Brown, Inc. is more attractive than CorVel Corp..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CorVel Corp. has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.743%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. CorVel Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. CorVel Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than CorVel Corp. quarterly revenues of $239.6M. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M is higher than CorVel Corp.'s net income of $27.9M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.20x while CorVel Corp.'s PE ratio is 35.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 4.39x versus 3.97x for CorVel Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of 14.03%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39% beat Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $91.14, signalling upside risk potential of 13.02%. On the other hand Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $91.09 which suggests that it could grow by 21.65%. Given that Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, Inc., analysts believe Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is more attractive than Brown & Brown, Inc..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.688%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues of $90.4M. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M is higher than Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $12.7M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.20x while Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s PE ratio is 65.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 4.39x versus 7.45x for Goosehead Insurance, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of 11.89%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39% beat Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $91.14, signalling upside risk potential of 13.02%. On the other hand Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $210.52 which suggests that it could grow by 13.18%. Given that Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, Inc., analysts believe Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Brown & Brown, Inc..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.396%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays out 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M is lower than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.20x while Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 4.39x versus 3.48x for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.