BRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CorVel Corp. has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of 11.65%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39% beat CorVel Corp.'s return on equity of 32.69%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.50, signalling upside risk potential of 17.39%. On the other hand CorVel Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brown & Brown, Inc. has higher upside potential than CorVel Corp., analysts believe Brown & Brown, Inc. is more attractive than CorVel Corp..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.816, which suggesting that the stock is 18.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CorVel Corp. has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.093%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. CorVel Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. CorVel Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than CorVel Corp. quarterly revenues of $239.6M. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M is higher than CorVel Corp.'s net income of $27.9M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.90x while CorVel Corp.'s PE ratio is 35.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 4.34x versus 3.97x for CorVel Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingstone Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of 21.42%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39% beat Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 38.25%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.50, signalling upside risk potential of 17.39%. On the other hand Kingstone Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.86%. Given that Kingstone Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, Inc., analysts believe Kingstone Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Brown & Brown, Inc..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.816, which suggesting that the stock is 18.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingstone Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.420, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.043%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Kingstone Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingstone Cos., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Kingstone Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.8M. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M is higher than Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s net income of $10.9M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.90x while Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 4.34x versus 1.16x for Kingstone Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of 11.89%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39% beat Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.50, signalling upside risk potential of 17.39%. On the other hand Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $211.85 which suggests that it could grow by 15.49%. Given that Brown & Brown, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., analysts believe Brown & Brown, Inc. is more attractive than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.816, which suggesting that the stock is 18.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.514%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays out 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M is lower than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.90x while Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 4.34x versus 3.44x for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Willis Towers Watson Plc has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of 13.37%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39% beat Willis Towers Watson Plc's return on equity of 26.7%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.50, signalling upside risk potential of 17.39%. On the other hand Willis Towers Watson Plc has an analysts' consensus of $365.22 which suggests that it could grow by 15.38%. Given that Brown & Brown, Inc. has higher upside potential than Willis Towers Watson Plc, analysts believe Brown & Brown, Inc. is more attractive than Willis Towers Watson Plc.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.816, which suggesting that the stock is 18.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Willis Towers Watson Plc has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.121%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Willis Towers Watson Plc offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Willis Towers Watson Plc pays out 402.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Willis Towers Watson Plc's is not.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Willis Towers Watson Plc quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M is lower than Willis Towers Watson Plc's net income of $306M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.90x while Willis Towers Watson Plc's PE ratio is 15.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 4.34x versus 3.23x for Willis Towers Watson Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.