BRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of -8.28%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39% beat Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.3%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $92.71, signalling upside risk potential of 14.77%. On the other hand Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $33.50 which suggests that it could grow by 30.86%. Given that Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, Inc., analysts believe Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is more attractive than Brown & Brown, Inc..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.816, which suggesting that the stock is 18.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.354, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.435%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $365.4M. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M is higher than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of -$30.2M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.24x while Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 4.40x versus 1.16x for Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of 14.03%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39% beat Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $92.71, signalling upside risk potential of 14.77%. On the other hand Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $91.55 which suggests that it could grow by 21.56%. Given that Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, Inc., analysts believe Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is more attractive than Brown & Brown, Inc..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.816, which suggesting that the stock is 18.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.525, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.464%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues of $90.4M. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M is higher than Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $12.7M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.24x while Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s PE ratio is 66.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 4.40x versus 7.49x for Goosehead Insurance, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of 11.89%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39% beat Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $92.71, signalling upside risk potential of 14.77%. On the other hand Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $211.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.01%. Given that Brown & Brown, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., analysts believe Brown & Brown, Inc. is more attractive than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.816, which suggesting that the stock is 18.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.514%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays out 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M is lower than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.24x while Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 4.40x versus 3.50x for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Willis Towers Watson Plc has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of 13.37%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39% beat Willis Towers Watson Plc's return on equity of 26.7%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $92.71, signalling upside risk potential of 14.77%. On the other hand Willis Towers Watson Plc has an analysts' consensus of $366.47 which suggests that it could grow by 9.53%. Given that Brown & Brown, Inc. has higher upside potential than Willis Towers Watson Plc, analysts believe Brown & Brown, Inc. is more attractive than Willis Towers Watson Plc.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.816, which suggesting that the stock is 18.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Willis Towers Watson Plc has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.121%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Willis Towers Watson Plc offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Willis Towers Watson Plc pays out 402.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Willis Towers Watson Plc's is not.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Willis Towers Watson Plc quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M is lower than Willis Towers Watson Plc's net income of $306M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.24x while Willis Towers Watson Plc's PE ratio is 15.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 4.40x versus 3.42x for Willis Towers Watson Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.