BRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Berkshire Hathaway has a net margin of 19.73% compared to Brown & Brown's net margin of 23.13%. Brown & Brown's return on equity of 18.1% beat Berkshire Hathaway's return on equity of 18.28%.

Brown & Brown has a consensus price target of $114.53, signalling upside risk potential of 11.27%. On the other hand Berkshire Hathaway has an analysts' consensus of $655,744.67 which suggests that it could grow by 9.42%. Given that Brown & Brown has higher upside potential than Berkshire Hathaway, analysts believe Brown & Brown is more attractive than Berkshire Hathaway.

Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.836, which suggesting that the stock is 16.426% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Berkshire Hathaway has a beta of 0.874, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.64%.

Brown & Brown has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Berkshire Hathaway offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brown & Brown pays 15.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Berkshire Hathaway pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Berkshire Hathaway quarterly revenues of $113.5B. Brown & Brown's net income of $234M is lower than Berkshire Hathaway's net income of $26.3B. Notably, Brown & Brown's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while Berkshire Hathaway's PE ratio is 9.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown is 6.39x versus 2.17x for Berkshire Hathaway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CorVel has a net margin of 19.73% compared to Brown & Brown's net margin of 10.43%. Brown & Brown's return on equity of 18.1% beat CorVel's return on equity of 32.6%.

Brown & Brown has a consensus price target of $114.53, signalling upside risk potential of 11.27%. On the other hand CorVel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brown & Brown has higher upside potential than CorVel, analysts believe Brown & Brown is more attractive than CorVel.

Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.836, which suggesting that the stock is 16.426% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CorVel has a beta of 1.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.888%.

Brown & Brown has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. CorVel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brown & Brown pays 15.51% of its earnings as a dividend. CorVel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than CorVel quarterly revenues of $224.4M. Brown & Brown's net income of $234M is higher than CorVel's net income of $23.4M. Notably, Brown & Brown's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while CorVel's PE ratio is 73.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown is 6.39x versus 7.07x for CorVel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingstone Companies has a net margin of 19.73% compared to Brown & Brown's net margin of 17.12%. Brown & Brown's return on equity of 18.1% beat Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 40.22%.

Brown & Brown has a consensus price target of $114.53, signalling upside risk potential of 11.27%. On the other hand Kingstone Companies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -4.06%. Given that Brown & Brown has higher upside potential than Kingstone Companies, analysts believe Brown & Brown is more attractive than Kingstone Companies.

Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.836, which suggesting that the stock is 16.426% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.712, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.819%.

Brown & Brown has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Kingstone Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brown & Brown pays 15.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingstone Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues of $40.8M. Brown & Brown's net income of $234M is higher than Kingstone Companies's net income of $7M. Notably, Brown & Brown's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while Kingstone Companies's PE ratio is 13.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown is 6.39x versus 1.40x for Kingstone Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a net margin of 19.73% compared to Brown & Brown's net margin of 13.11%. Brown & Brown's return on equity of 18.1% beat Marsh & McLennan Companies's return on equity of 31.46%.

Brown & Brown has a consensus price target of $114.53, signalling upside risk potential of 11.27%. On the other hand Marsh & McLennan Companies has an analysts' consensus of $232.03 which suggests that it could grow by 9.58%. Given that Brown & Brown has higher upside potential than Marsh & McLennan Companies, analysts believe Brown & Brown is more attractive than Marsh & McLennan Companies.

Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.836, which suggesting that the stock is 16.426% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.724%.

Brown & Brown has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Marsh & McLennan Companies offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Brown & Brown pays 15.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 34.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Marsh & McLennan Companies quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Brown & Brown's net income of $234M is lower than Marsh & McLennan Companies's net income of $747M. Notably, Brown & Brown's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.05x while Marsh & McLennan Companies's PE ratio is 26.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown is 6.39x versus 4.39x for Marsh & McLennan Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.