BRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a net margin of 16.49% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of 19.79%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.56% beat Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.99%. On the other hand Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $83.09 which suggests that it could grow by 86.93%. Given that Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, Inc., analysts believe Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is more attractive than Brown & Brown, Inc..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.793, which suggesting that the stock is 20.679% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.465%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 19.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues of $105.3M. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $265M is higher than Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $20.8M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.79x while Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s PE ratio is 42.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 3.68x versus 4.25x for Goosehead Insurance, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RLI Corp. has a net margin of 16.49% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of 19.58%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.56% beat RLI Corp.'s return on equity of 20.81%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.99%. On the other hand RLI Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $59.75 which suggests that it could fall by -1.84%. Given that Brown & Brown, Inc. has higher upside potential than RLI Corp., analysts believe Brown & Brown, Inc. is more attractive than RLI Corp..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.793, which suggesting that the stock is 20.679% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RLI Corp. has a beta of 0.526, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.424%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. RLI Corp. offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.16 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 19.46% of its earnings as a dividend. RLI Corp. pays out 14.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than RLI Corp. quarterly revenues of $465.7M. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $265M is higher than RLI Corp.'s net income of $91.2M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.79x while RLI Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 3.68x versus 3.03x for RLI Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Willis Towers Watson Plc has a net margin of 16.49% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net margin of 25.07%. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.56% beat Willis Towers Watson Plc's return on equity of 19.99%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.99%. On the other hand Willis Towers Watson Plc has an analysts' consensus of $373.26 which suggests that it could grow by 23.68%. Given that Willis Towers Watson Plc has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, Inc., analysts believe Willis Towers Watson Plc is more attractive than Brown & Brown, Inc..

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.793, which suggesting that the stock is 20.679% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Willis Towers Watson Plc has a beta of 0.621, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.867%.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Willis Towers Watson Plc offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays 19.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Willis Towers Watson Plc pays out 22.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Willis Towers Watson Plc quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $265M is lower than Willis Towers Watson Plc's net income of $736M. Notably, Brown & Brown, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.79x while Willis Towers Watson Plc's PE ratio is 18.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown, Inc. is 3.68x versus 3.08x for Willis Towers Watson Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.