RLI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 20.22% compared to RLI's net margin of 7.16%. RLI's return on equity of 27.72% beat Allstate's return on equity of 23.5%.

RLI has a consensus price target of $184.60, signalling upside risk potential of 13.08%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $223.18 which suggests that it could grow by 15.26%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than RLI, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than RLI.

RLI has a beta of 0.457, which suggesting that the stock is 54.344% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.504, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.607%.

RLI has a quarterly dividend of $4.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. RLI pays 45.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. RLI's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RLI quarterly revenues are $470M, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.6B. RLI's net income of $95M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.2B. Notably, RLI's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.13x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RLI is 4.29x versus 0.82x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a net margin of 20.22% compared to RLI's net margin of 11.42%. RLI's return on equity of 27.72% beat The Hartford Financial Services Group's return on equity of 19.63%.

RLI has a consensus price target of $184.60, signalling upside risk potential of 13.08%. On the other hand The Hartford Financial Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $129.29 which suggests that it could grow by 17.57%. Given that The Hartford Financial Services Group has higher upside potential than RLI, analysts believe The Hartford Financial Services Group is more attractive than RLI.

RLI has a beta of 0.457, which suggesting that the stock is 54.344% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.912%.

RLI has a quarterly dividend of $4.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. The Hartford Financial Services Group offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. RLI pays 45.99% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays out 21.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RLI quarterly revenues are $470M, which are smaller than The Hartford Financial Services Group quarterly revenues of $6.7B. RLI's net income of $95M is lower than The Hartford Financial Services Group's net income of $767M. Notably, RLI's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.13x while The Hartford Financial Services Group's PE ratio is 10.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RLI is 4.29x versus 1.28x for The Hartford Financial Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury General has a net margin of 20.22% compared to RLI's net margin of 15.09%. RLI's return on equity of 27.72% beat Mercury General's return on equity of 34.73%.

RLI has a consensus price target of $184.60, signalling upside risk potential of 13.08%. On the other hand Mercury General has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.66%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than RLI, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than RLI.

RLI has a beta of 0.457, which suggesting that the stock is 54.344% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury General has a beta of 0.840, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.981%.

RLI has a quarterly dividend of $4.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Mercury General offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. RLI pays 45.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General pays out 73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RLI quarterly revenues are $470M, which are smaller than Mercury General quarterly revenues of $1.5B. RLI's net income of $95M is lower than Mercury General's net income of $230.9M. Notably, RLI's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.13x while Mercury General's PE ratio is 6.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RLI is 4.29x versus 0.69x for Mercury General. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 20.22% compared to RLI's net margin of 10.83%. RLI's return on equity of 27.72% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.53%.

RLI has a consensus price target of $184.60, signalling upside risk potential of 13.08%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $64.13 which suggests that it could grow by 9.8%. Given that RLI has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe RLI is more attractive than WR Berkley.

RLI has a beta of 0.457, which suggesting that the stock is 54.344% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.649, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.058%.

RLI has a quarterly dividend of $4.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. RLI pays 45.99% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 36.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RLI quarterly revenues are $470M, which are smaller than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.4B. RLI's net income of $95M is lower than WR Berkley's net income of $365.6M. Notably, RLI's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.13x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 14.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RLI is 4.29x versus 1.80x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.