CNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Allstate Corp. has a net margin of 10.56% compared to CNA Financial Corp.'s net margin of 21.7%. CNA Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 9.31% beat The Allstate Corp.'s return on equity of 35.98%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.13%. On the other hand The Allstate Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $236.60 which suggests that it could grow by 14.65%. Given that The Allstate Corp. has higher upside potential than CNA Financial Corp., analysts believe The Allstate Corp. is more attractive than CNA Financial Corp..

CNA Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.401, which suggesting that the stock is 59.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Allstate Corp. has a beta of 0.252, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.787%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. The Allstate Corp. offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. CNA Financial Corp. pays 50.05% of its earnings as a dividend. The Allstate Corp. pays out 21.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNA Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are smaller than The Allstate Corp. quarterly revenues of $17.3B. CNA Financial Corp.'s net income of $403M is lower than The Allstate Corp.'s net income of $3.7B. Notably, CNA Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.31x while The Allstate Corp.'s PE ratio is 6.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial Corp. is 0.83x versus 0.83x for The Allstate Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cincinnati Financial Corp. has a net margin of 10.56% compared to CNA Financial Corp.'s net margin of 30.11%. CNA Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 9.31% beat Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 14.91%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.13%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $172.67 which suggests that it could grow by 5.92%. Given that Cincinnati Financial Corp. has higher upside potential than CNA Financial Corp., analysts believe Cincinnati Financial Corp. is more attractive than CNA Financial Corp..

CNA Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.401, which suggesting that the stock is 59.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.689, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.09%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. Cincinnati Financial Corp. offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. CNA Financial Corp. pays 50.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial Corp. pays out 22.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNA Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. CNA Financial Corp.'s net income of $403M is lower than Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, CNA Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.31x while Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial Corp. is 0.83x versus 2.13x for Cincinnati Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loews Corp. has a net margin of 10.56% compared to CNA Financial Corp.'s net margin of 11.48%. CNA Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 9.31% beat Loews Corp.'s return on equity of 8.35%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.13%. On the other hand Loews Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -69.38%. Given that Loews Corp. has more downside risk than CNA Financial Corp., analysts believe CNA Financial Corp. is more attractive than Loews Corp..

CNA Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.401, which suggesting that the stock is 59.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loews Corp. has a beta of 0.615, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.459%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. Loews Corp. offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. CNA Financial Corp. pays 50.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews Corp. pays out 3.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNA Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are smaller than Loews Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.7B. CNA Financial Corp.'s net income of $403M is lower than Loews Corp.'s net income of $536M. Notably, CNA Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.31x while Loews Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial Corp. is 0.83x versus 1.21x for Loews Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W.R. Berkley Corp. has a net margin of 10.56% compared to CNA Financial Corp.'s net margin of 13.59%. CNA Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 9.31% beat W.R. Berkley Corp.'s return on equity of 21.23%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.13%. On the other hand W.R. Berkley Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $74.20 which suggests that it could grow by 3.56%. Given that W.R. Berkley Corp. has higher upside potential than CNA Financial Corp., analysts believe W.R. Berkley Corp. is more attractive than CNA Financial Corp..

CNA Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.401, which suggesting that the stock is 59.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.R. Berkley Corp. has a beta of 0.375, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.5%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. W.R. Berkley Corp. offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. CNA Financial Corp. pays 50.05% of its earnings as a dividend. W.R. Berkley Corp. pays out 7.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNA Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than W.R. Berkley Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. CNA Financial Corp.'s net income of $403M is lower than W.R. Berkley Corp.'s net income of $512M. Notably, CNA Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.31x while W.R. Berkley Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial Corp. is 0.83x versus 1.96x for W.R. Berkley Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.