CNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Assurant, Inc. has a net margin of 10.56% compared to CNA Financial Corp.'s net margin of 8.22%. CNA Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 9.31% beat Assurant, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.8%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $44.00, signalling downside risk potential of -8.07%. On the other hand Assurant, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $259.33 which suggests that it could grow by 8.9%. Given that Assurant, Inc. has higher upside potential than CNA Financial Corp., analysts believe Assurant, Inc. is more attractive than CNA Financial Corp..

CNA Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.523% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Assurant, Inc. has a beta of 0.562, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.781%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Assurant, Inc. offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. CNA Financial Corp. pays 50.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Assurant, Inc. pays out 20.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNA Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Assurant, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. CNA Financial Corp.'s net income of $403M is higher than Assurant, Inc.'s net income of $265.6M. Notably, CNA Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.07x while Assurant, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial Corp. is 0.88x versus 0.98x for Assurant, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loews Corp. has a net margin of 10.56% compared to CNA Financial Corp.'s net margin of 11.48%. CNA Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 9.31% beat Loews Corp.'s return on equity of 8.35%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $44.00, signalling downside risk potential of -8.07%. On the other hand Loews Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -69.69%. Given that Loews Corp. has more downside risk than CNA Financial Corp., analysts believe CNA Financial Corp. is more attractive than Loews Corp..

CNA Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.523% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loews Corp. has a beta of 0.609, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.071%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Loews Corp. offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. CNA Financial Corp. pays 50.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews Corp. pays out 3.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNA Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are smaller than Loews Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.7B. CNA Financial Corp.'s net income of $403M is lower than Loews Corp.'s net income of $536M. Notably, CNA Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.07x while Loews Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial Corp. is 0.88x versus 1.22x for Loews Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unum Group has a net margin of 10.56% compared to CNA Financial Corp.'s net margin of 1.18%. CNA Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 9.31% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 8.25%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $44.00, signalling downside risk potential of -8.07%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $95.62 which suggests that it could grow by 25.86%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than CNA Financial Corp., analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than CNA Financial Corp..

CNA Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.523% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.200, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.961%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. CNA Financial Corp. pays 50.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 16.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNA Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.4B. CNA Financial Corp.'s net income of $403M is higher than Unum Group's net income of $39.7M. Notably, CNA Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.07x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 14.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial Corp. is 0.88x versus 1.03x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W.R. Berkley Corp. has a net margin of 10.56% compared to CNA Financial Corp.'s net margin of 12.23%. CNA Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 9.31% beat W.R. Berkley Corp.'s return on equity of 19.34%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $44.00, signalling downside risk potential of -8.07%. On the other hand W.R. Berkley Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $68.94 which suggests that it could grow by 0.61%. Given that W.R. Berkley Corp. has higher upside potential than CNA Financial Corp., analysts believe W.R. Berkley Corp. is more attractive than CNA Financial Corp..

CNA Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.523% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.R. Berkley Corp. has a beta of 0.387, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.279%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. W.R. Berkley Corp. offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share. CNA Financial Corp. pays 50.05% of its earnings as a dividend. W.R. Berkley Corp. pays out 7.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNA Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than W.R. Berkley Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. CNA Financial Corp.'s net income of $403M is lower than W.R. Berkley Corp.'s net income of $454.8M. Notably, CNA Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.07x while W.R. Berkley Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial Corp. is 0.88x versus 1.86x for W.R. Berkley Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.