CNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Allstate Corp. has a net margin of 10.56% compared to CNA Financial Corp.'s net margin of 21.7%. CNA Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 9.31% beat The Allstate Corp.'s return on equity of 35.98%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.02%. On the other hand The Allstate Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $236.05 which suggests that it could grow by 12.65%. Given that The Allstate Corp. has higher upside potential than CNA Financial Corp., analysts believe The Allstate Corp. is more attractive than CNA Financial Corp..

CNA Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.401, which suggesting that the stock is 59.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Allstate Corp. has a beta of 0.252, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.787%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. The Allstate Corp. offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. CNA Financial Corp. pays 50.05% of its earnings as a dividend. The Allstate Corp. pays out 21.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNA Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are smaller than The Allstate Corp. quarterly revenues of $17.3B. CNA Financial Corp.'s net income of $403M is lower than The Allstate Corp.'s net income of $3.7B. Notably, CNA Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.08x while The Allstate Corp.'s PE ratio is 6.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial Corp. is 0.88x versus 0.84x for The Allstate Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cincinnati Financial Corp. has a net margin of 10.56% compared to CNA Financial Corp.'s net margin of 30.11%. CNA Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 9.31% beat Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 14.91%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.02%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $173.83 which suggests that it could grow by 4.8%. Given that Cincinnati Financial Corp. has higher upside potential than CNA Financial Corp., analysts believe Cincinnati Financial Corp. is more attractive than CNA Financial Corp..

CNA Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.401, which suggesting that the stock is 59.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.689, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.09%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Cincinnati Financial Corp. offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. CNA Financial Corp. pays 50.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial Corp. pays out 22.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNA Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. CNA Financial Corp.'s net income of $403M is lower than Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, CNA Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.08x while Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial Corp. is 0.88x versus 2.16x for Cincinnati Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loews Corp. has a net margin of 10.56% compared to CNA Financial Corp.'s net margin of 11.48%. CNA Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 9.31% beat Loews Corp.'s return on equity of 8.35%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.02%. On the other hand Loews Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -70.19%. Given that Loews Corp. has more downside risk than CNA Financial Corp., analysts believe CNA Financial Corp. is more attractive than Loews Corp..

CNA Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.401, which suggesting that the stock is 59.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loews Corp. has a beta of 0.615, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.459%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Loews Corp. offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. CNA Financial Corp. pays 50.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews Corp. pays out 3.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNA Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are smaller than Loews Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.7B. CNA Financial Corp.'s net income of $403M is lower than Loews Corp.'s net income of $536M. Notably, CNA Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.08x while Loews Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial Corp. is 0.88x versus 1.25x for Loews Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 10.56% compared to CNA Financial Corp.'s net margin of 15.14%. CNA Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 9.31% beat The Travelers Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 20.27%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.02%. On the other hand The Travelers Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $297.10 which suggests that it could grow by 1.11%. Given that The Travelers Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than CNA Financial Corp., analysts believe The Travelers Cos., Inc. is more attractive than CNA Financial Corp..

CNA Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.401, which suggesting that the stock is 59.902% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.534, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.571%.

CNA Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. The Travelers Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. CNA Financial Corp. pays 50.05% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Cos., Inc. pays out 19.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNA Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are smaller than The Travelers Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.5B. CNA Financial Corp.'s net income of $403M is lower than The Travelers Cos., Inc.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, CNA Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.08x while The Travelers Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial Corp. is 0.88x versus 1.39x for The Travelers Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.