Is it Too Late to Buy United Airlines Stock?
United Airlines (NASDAQ:UAL) has thoroughly outpaced the broader stock market…
Buy
59
CNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$50.93
Seasonality move
:
2.54%
Day range:
$50.24 - $51.03
52-week range:
$42.33 - $52.36
Dividend yield:
3.51%
P/E ratio:
14.43x
P/S ratio:
0.99x
P/B ratio:
1.31x
Volume:
318K
Avg. volume:
450.2K
1-year change:
11.82%
Market cap:
$13.8B
Revenue:
$14B
EPS (TTM):
$3.52
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNA
CNA Financial
|
$3.7B | $1.24 | 8.5% | -0.4% | $48.00 |
|
AFG
American Financial Group
|
$1.7B | $2.08 | -7.42% | -28.09% | $136.40 |
|
CINF
Cincinnati Financial
|
$2.7B | -$0.52 | -7.81% | -99.19% | $157.00 |
|
L
Loews
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PRA
ProAssurance
|
$272.8M | $0.20 | -3.16% | 117.78% | $20.25 |
|
WRB
WR Berkley
|
$3B | $1.06 | -7.75% | -2.86% | $65.26 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNA
CNA Financial
|
$50.79 | $48.00 | $13.8B | 14.43x | $2.46 | 3.51% | 0.99x |
|
AFG
American Financial Group
|
$131.34 | $136.40 | $11B | 12.43x | $2.00 | 2.3% | 1.33x |
|
CINF
Cincinnati Financial
|
$147.75 | $157.00 | $23.1B | 10.18x | $0.87 | 2.23% | 2.06x |
|
L
Loews
|
$91.91 | -- | $19.4B | 14.36x | $0.06 | 0.27% | 1.18x |
|
PRA
ProAssurance
|
$23.35 | $20.25 | $1.2B | 22.89x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.06x |
|
WRB
WR Berkley
|
$71.16 | $65.26 | $27B | 16.31x | $0.08 | 0.45% | 2.09x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNA
CNA Financial
|
22.05% | 0.450 | 22.69% | 22.94x |
|
AFG
American Financial Group
|
24.83% | 0.872 | 12.83% | 8.21x |
|
CINF
Cincinnati Financial
|
5.53% | 0.853 | 3.63% | 851.88x |
|
L
Loews
|
34.39% | 0.303 | 46.94% | 147.51x |
|
PRA
ProAssurance
|
26.12% | -1.829 | 52.2% | 29.87x |
|
WRB
WR Berkley
|
25.28% | 0.593 | 12.77% | 43.28x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNA
CNA Financial
|
-- | -- | 7.25% | 9.46% | 1.47% | $665M |
|
AFG
American Financial Group
|
-- | -- | 15.07% | 20.11% | 15.78% | $674M |
|
CINF
Cincinnati Financial
|
-- | -- | 16.49% | 17.56% | 19.39% | $638M |
|
L
Loews
|
-- | -- | 5.27% | 8.14% | 6.67% | $767M |
|
PRA
ProAssurance
|
-- | -- | 3.33% | 4.55% | 8.47% | -$2.6M |
|
WRB
WR Berkley
|
-- | -- | 16.23% | 22.01% | 20.43% | $796.1M |
CNA Financial vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CNA or AFG?
American Financial Group has a net margin of 0.58% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 11.87%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46% beat American Financial Group's return on equity of 20.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNACNA Financial-- $0.07 $13.5B AFGAmerican Financial Group-- $3.03 $5.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CNA or AFG?
CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling downside risk potential of -5.49%. On the other hand American Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $136.40 which suggests that it could grow by 3.85%. Given that American Financial Group has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe American Financial Group is more attractive than CNA Financial.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNACNA Financial0 1 0 AFGAmerican Financial Group1 4 0 -
Is CNA or AFG More Risky?
CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, which suggesting that the stock is 52.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Financial Group has a beta of 0.592, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.813%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNA or AFG?
CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. American Financial Group offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. American Financial Group pays out 88.84% of its earnings as a dividend. American Financial Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNA or AFG?
CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than American Financial Group quarterly revenues of $2.1B. CNA Financial's net income of $21M is lower than American Financial Group's net income of $255M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.43x while American Financial Group's PE ratio is 12.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.99x versus 1.33x for American Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNACNA Financial0.99x 14.43x $3.6B $21M AFGAmerican Financial Group1.33x 12.43x $2.1B $255M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNA or CINF?
Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 0.58% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 15.96%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNACNA Financial-- $0.07 $13.5B CINFCincinnati Financial-- $2.56 $14.8B -
What do Analysts Say About CNA or CINF?
CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling downside risk potential of -5.49%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $157.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.26%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than CNA Financial.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNACNA Financial0 1 0 CINFCincinnati Financial1 4 0 -
Is CNA or CINF More Risky?
CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, which suggesting that the stock is 52.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.532, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.757%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNA or CINF?
CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNA or CINF?
CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.5B. CNA Financial's net income of $21M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.43x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 10.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.99x versus 2.06x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNACNA Financial0.99x 14.43x $3.6B $21M CINFCincinnati Financial2.06x 10.18x $2.5B $405M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNA or L?
Loews has a net margin of 0.58% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 4.18%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46% beat Loews's return on equity of 8.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNACNA Financial-- $0.07 $13.5B LLoews-- $0.86 $26.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CNA or L?
CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling downside risk potential of -5.49%. On the other hand Loews has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -65.18%. Given that Loews has more downside risk than CNA Financial, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than Loews.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNACNA Financial0 1 0 LLoews0 0 0 -
Is CNA or L More Risky?
CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, which suggesting that the stock is 52.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loews has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.612%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNA or L?
CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Loews offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews pays out 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNA or L?
CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Loews quarterly revenues of $4.5B. CNA Financial's net income of $21M is lower than Loews's net income of $187M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.43x while Loews's PE ratio is 14.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.99x versus 1.18x for Loews. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNACNA Financial0.99x 14.43x $3.6B $21M LLoews1.18x 14.36x $4.5B $187M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNA or PRA?
ProAssurance has a net margin of 0.58% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 5.69%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46% beat ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNACNA Financial-- $0.07 $13.5B PRAProAssurance-- $0.31 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About CNA or PRA?
CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling downside risk potential of -5.49%. On the other hand ProAssurance has an analysts' consensus of $20.25 which suggests that it could fall by -13.28%. Given that ProAssurance has more downside risk than CNA Financial, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than ProAssurance.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNACNA Financial0 1 0 PRAProAssurance0 4 0 -
Is CNA or PRA More Risky?
CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, which suggesting that the stock is 52.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProAssurance has a beta of -0.088, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.754%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNA or PRA?
CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. ProAssurance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. ProAssurance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNA or PRA?
CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than ProAssurance quarterly revenues of $284.3M. CNA Financial's net income of $21M is higher than ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.43x while ProAssurance's PE ratio is 22.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.99x versus 1.06x for ProAssurance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNACNA Financial0.99x 14.43x $3.6B $21M PRAProAssurance1.06x 22.89x $284.3M $16.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNA or WRB?
WR Berkley has a net margin of 0.58% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 15.48%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNACNA Financial-- $0.07 $13.5B WRBWR Berkley-- $1.44 $11.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CNA or WRB?
CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling downside risk potential of -5.49%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $65.26 which suggests that it could fall by -8.3%. Given that WR Berkley has more downside risk than CNA Financial, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than WR Berkley.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNACNA Financial0 1 0 WRBWR Berkley7 7 0 -
Is CNA or WRB More Risky?
CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, which suggesting that the stock is 52.703% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.537%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNA or WRB?
CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNA or WRB?
CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.7B. CNA Financial's net income of $21M is lower than WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.43x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 16.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.99x versus 2.09x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNACNA Financial0.99x 14.43x $3.6B $21M WRBWR Berkley2.09x 16.31x $3.7B $576.1M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
3 Smartest Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
When the market entered a correction in February and March,…
How High Could IBIT Go?
Recently, a surprising number of billionaire hedge fund managers have…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Sell
41
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.6T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
80
CORT alert for Apr 1
Corcept Therapeutics [CORT] is down 19.56% over the past day.
Sell
16
PCVX alert for Apr 1
Vaxcyte [PCVX] is down 14.62% over the past day.
Buy
74
COOP alert for Apr 1
Mr. Cooper Group [COOP] is up 4.63% over the past day.
