WTW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brown & Brown has a net margin of 10.57% compared to Willis Towers Watson PLC's net margin of 23.9%. Willis Towers Watson PLC's return on equity of -0.62% beat Brown & Brown's return on equity of 16.34%.

Willis Towers Watson PLC has a consensus price target of $365.79, signalling upside risk potential of 19.53%. On the other hand Brown & Brown has an analysts' consensus of $119.31 which suggests that it could grow by 6.97%. Given that Willis Towers Watson PLC has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, analysts believe Willis Towers Watson PLC is more attractive than Brown & Brown.

Willis Towers Watson PLC has a beta of 0.730, which suggesting that the stock is 26.991% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.658%.

Willis Towers Watson PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Brown & Brown offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Willis Towers Watson PLC pays -361.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown pays out 15.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Willis Towers Watson PLC quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Brown & Brown quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Willis Towers Watson PLC's net income of $235M is lower than Brown & Brown's net income of $331M. Notably, Willis Towers Watson PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.95x while Brown & Brown's PE ratio is 31.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Willis Towers Watson PLC is 3.16x versus 6.60x for Brown & Brown. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CorVel has a net margin of 10.57% compared to Willis Towers Watson PLC's net margin of 10.43%. Willis Towers Watson PLC's return on equity of -0.62% beat CorVel's return on equity of 33.19%.

Willis Towers Watson PLC has a consensus price target of $365.79, signalling upside risk potential of 19.53%. On the other hand CorVel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Willis Towers Watson PLC has higher upside potential than CorVel, analysts believe Willis Towers Watson PLC is more attractive than CorVel.

Willis Towers Watson PLC has a beta of 0.730, which suggesting that the stock is 26.991% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CorVel has a beta of 1.102, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.208%.

Willis Towers Watson PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. CorVel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Willis Towers Watson PLC pays -361.23% of its earnings as a dividend. CorVel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Willis Towers Watson PLC quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than CorVel quarterly revenues of $228M. Willis Towers Watson PLC's net income of $235M is higher than CorVel's net income of $23.8M. Notably, Willis Towers Watson PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.95x while CorVel's PE ratio is 65.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Willis Towers Watson PLC is 3.16x versus 6.65x for CorVel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingstone Companies has a net margin of 10.57% compared to Willis Towers Watson PLC's net margin of 12.92%. Willis Towers Watson PLC's return on equity of -0.62% beat Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 38.66%.

Willis Towers Watson PLC has a consensus price target of $365.79, signalling upside risk potential of 19.53%. On the other hand Kingstone Companies has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.68%. Given that Willis Towers Watson PLC has higher upside potential than Kingstone Companies, analysts believe Willis Towers Watson PLC is more attractive than Kingstone Companies.

Willis Towers Watson PLC has a beta of 0.730, which suggesting that the stock is 26.991% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.519%.

Willis Towers Watson PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Kingstone Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Willis Towers Watson PLC pays -361.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingstone Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Willis Towers Watson PLC quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues of $42.1M. Willis Towers Watson PLC's net income of $235M is higher than Kingstone Companies's net income of $5.4M. Notably, Willis Towers Watson PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.95x while Kingstone Companies's PE ratio is 12.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Willis Towers Watson PLC is 3.16x versus 1.45x for Kingstone Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a net margin of 10.57% compared to Willis Towers Watson PLC's net margin of 19.56%. Willis Towers Watson PLC's return on equity of -0.62% beat Marsh & McLennan Companies's return on equity of 29.77%.

Willis Towers Watson PLC has a consensus price target of $365.79, signalling upside risk potential of 19.53%. On the other hand Marsh & McLennan Companies has an analysts' consensus of $233.06 which suggests that it could grow by 2.26%. Given that Willis Towers Watson PLC has higher upside potential than Marsh & McLennan Companies, analysts believe Willis Towers Watson PLC is more attractive than Marsh & McLennan Companies.

Willis Towers Watson PLC has a beta of 0.730, which suggesting that the stock is 26.991% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.847, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.285%.

Willis Towers Watson PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Marsh & McLennan Companies offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Willis Towers Watson PLC pays -361.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 37.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Willis Towers Watson PLC quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Marsh & McLennan Companies quarterly revenues of $7.1B. Willis Towers Watson PLC's net income of $235M is lower than Marsh & McLennan Companies's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Willis Towers Watson PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.95x while Marsh & McLennan Companies's PE ratio is 27.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Willis Towers Watson PLC is 3.16x versus 4.51x for Marsh & McLennan Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.