GSHD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a net margin of 19.79% compared to Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net margin of 16.49%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38% beat Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.56%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.09, signalling upside risk potential of 86.93%. On the other hand Brown & Brown, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $83.50 which suggests that it could grow by 19.99%. Given that Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, Inc., analysts believe Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is more attractive than Brown & Brown, Inc..

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.465% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.793, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.679%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brown & Brown, Inc. offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays out 19.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues are $105.3M, which are smaller than Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $20.8M is lower than Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $265M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.46x while Brown & Brown, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is 4.25x versus 3.68x for Brown & Brown, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a net margin of 19.79% compared to Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net margin of -8.28%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38% beat Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.3%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.09, signalling upside risk potential of 86.93%. On the other hand Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $31.50 which suggests that it could grow by 90.56%. Given that Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, Inc., analysts believe Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance, Inc..

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.465% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.344%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues are $105.3M, which are smaller than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $365.4M. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $20.8M is higher than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of -$30.2M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.46x while Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is 4.25x versus 0.75x for Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TWFG, Inc. has a net margin of 19.79% compared to Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net margin of 15.01%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38% beat TWFG, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.94%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.09, signalling upside risk potential of 86.93%. On the other hand TWFG, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $33.00 which suggests that it could grow by 88.36%. Given that TWFG, Inc. has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, Inc., analysts believe TWFG, Inc. is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance, Inc..

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.465% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TWFG, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TWFG, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TWFG, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues are $105.3M, which are larger than TWFG, Inc. quarterly revenues of $64.1M. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $20.8M is higher than TWFG, Inc.'s net income of $9.6M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.46x while TWFG, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is 4.25x versus 1.93x for TWFG, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.