GSHD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a net margin of 14.03% compared to Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net margin of 14.14%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38% beat Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a consensus price target of $91.55, signalling upside risk potential of 21.56%. On the other hand Brown & Brown, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $92.71 which suggests that it could grow by 14.77%. Given that Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, Inc., analysts believe Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is more attractive than Brown & Brown, Inc..

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.525, which suggesting that the stock is 52.464% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.816, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.449%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brown & Brown, Inc. offers a yield of 0.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays out 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues are $90.4M, which are smaller than Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $12.7M is lower than Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 66.24x while Brown & Brown, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is 7.49x versus 4.40x for Brown & Brown, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a net margin of 14.03% compared to Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net margin of -8.28%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38% beat Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.3%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a consensus price target of $91.55, signalling upside risk potential of 21.56%. On the other hand Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $33.50 which suggests that it could grow by 30.86%. Given that Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, Inc., analysts believe Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance, Inc..

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.525, which suggesting that the stock is 52.464% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.354, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.435%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues are $90.4M, which are smaller than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $365.4M. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $12.7M is higher than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of -$30.2M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 66.24x while Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is 7.49x versus 1.16x for Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CorVel Corp. has a net margin of 14.03% compared to Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net margin of 11.65%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38% beat CorVel Corp.'s return on equity of 32.69%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a consensus price target of $91.55, signalling upside risk potential of 21.56%. On the other hand CorVel Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has higher upside potential than CorVel Corp., analysts believe Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is more attractive than CorVel Corp..

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.525, which suggesting that the stock is 52.464% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CorVel Corp. has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.093%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CorVel Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CorVel Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues are $90.4M, which are smaller than CorVel Corp. quarterly revenues of $239.6M. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $12.7M is lower than CorVel Corp.'s net income of $27.9M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 66.24x while CorVel Corp.'s PE ratio is 34.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is 7.49x versus 3.84x for CorVel Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 14.03% compared to Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net margin of 11.89%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38% beat Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a consensus price target of $91.55, signalling upside risk potential of 21.56%. On the other hand Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $211.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.01%. Given that Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., analysts believe Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is more attractive than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc..

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.525, which suggesting that the stock is 52.464% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.514%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays out 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues are $90.4M, which are smaller than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $12.7M is lower than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 66.24x while Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is 7.49x versus 3.50x for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.