TWFG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

eHealth, Inc. has a net margin of 15.01% compared to TWFG, Inc.'s net margin of -58.83%. TWFG, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.94% beat eHealth, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.62%.

TWFG, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.75%. On the other hand eHealth, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 104.82%. Given that eHealth, Inc. has higher upside potential than TWFG, Inc., analysts believe eHealth, Inc. is more attractive than TWFG, Inc..

TWFG, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eHealth, Inc. has a beta of 1.271, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.113%.

TWFG, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eHealth, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TWFG, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth, Inc. pays out -55.3% of its earnings as a dividend.

TWFG, Inc. quarterly revenues are $64.1M, which are larger than eHealth, Inc. quarterly revenues of $53.9M. TWFG, Inc.'s net income of $9.6M is higher than eHealth, Inc.'s net income of -$31.7M. Notably, TWFG, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 65.72x while eHealth, Inc.'s PE ratio is 111.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TWFG, Inc. is 3.20x versus 0.23x for eHealth, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a net margin of 15.01% compared to TWFG, Inc.'s net margin of 14.03%. TWFG, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.94% beat Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38%.

TWFG, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.75%. On the other hand Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $91.55 which suggests that it could grow by 20.74%. Given that Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has higher upside potential than TWFG, Inc., analysts believe Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is more attractive than TWFG, Inc..

TWFG, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.525, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.464%.

TWFG, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share. TWFG, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TWFG, Inc. quarterly revenues are $64.1M, which are smaller than Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues of $90.4M. TWFG, Inc.'s net income of $9.6M is lower than Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $12.7M. Notably, TWFG, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 65.72x while Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s PE ratio is 66.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TWFG, Inc. is 3.20x versus 7.55x for Goosehead Insurance, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingstone Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 15.01% compared to TWFG, Inc.'s net margin of 21.42%. TWFG, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.94% beat Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 38.25%.

TWFG, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.75%. On the other hand Kingstone Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.58%. Given that Kingstone Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than TWFG, Inc., analysts believe Kingstone Cos., Inc. is more attractive than TWFG, Inc..

TWFG, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingstone Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.420, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.043%.

TWFG, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingstone Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. TWFG, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingstone Cos., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TWFG, Inc. quarterly revenues are $64.1M, which are larger than Kingstone Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.8M. TWFG, Inc.'s net income of $9.6M is lower than Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s net income of $10.9M. Notably, TWFG, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 65.72x while Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TWFG, Inc. is 3.20x versus 1.35x for Kingstone Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance Global Group, Inc. has a net margin of 15.01% compared to TWFG, Inc.'s net margin of -46.34%. TWFG, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.94% beat Reliance Global Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -191.75%.

TWFG, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.75%. On the other hand Reliance Global Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19146.33%. Given that Reliance Global Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than TWFG, Inc., analysts believe Reliance Global Group, Inc. is more attractive than TWFG, Inc..

TWFG, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance Global Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.081, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.885%.

TWFG, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reliance Global Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. TWFG, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance Global Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TWFG, Inc. quarterly revenues are $64.1M, which are larger than Reliance Global Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5M. TWFG, Inc.'s net income of $9.6M is higher than Reliance Global Group, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, TWFG, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 65.72x while Reliance Global Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TWFG, Inc. is 3.20x versus 0.16x for Reliance Global Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.