TWFG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a net margin of 20.88% compared to TWFG, Inc.'s net margin of -12.58%. TWFG, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.67% beat Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.09%.

TWFG, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.38%. On the other hand Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $30.22 which suggests that it could grow by 37.31%. Given that TWFG, Inc. has higher upside potential than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc., analysts believe TWFG, Inc. is more attractive than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc..

TWFG, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.386%.

TWFG, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TWFG, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TWFG, Inc. quarterly revenues are $68.8M, which are smaller than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $347.3M. TWFG, Inc.'s net income of $14.4M is higher than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of -$43.7M. Notably, TWFG, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 48.86x while Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TWFG, Inc. is 2.69x versus 1.01x for Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Crawford & Co. has a net margin of 20.88% compared to TWFG, Inc.'s net margin of -2.27%. TWFG, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.67% beat Crawford & Co.'s return on equity of 11.62%.

TWFG, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.38%. On the other hand Crawford & Co. has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.14%. Given that TWFG, Inc. has higher upside potential than Crawford & Co., analysts believe TWFG, Inc. is more attractive than Crawford & Co..

TWFG, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crawford & Co. has a beta of 0.829, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.128%.

TWFG, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crawford & Co. offers a yield of 2.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. TWFG, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crawford & Co. pays out 73.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Crawford & Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TWFG, Inc. quarterly revenues are $68.8M, which are smaller than Crawford & Co. quarterly revenues of $320.9M. TWFG, Inc.'s net income of $14.4M is higher than Crawford & Co.'s net income of -$7.3M. Notably, TWFG, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 48.86x while Crawford & Co.'s PE ratio is 25.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TWFG, Inc. is 2.69x versus 0.38x for Crawford & Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a net margin of 20.88% compared to TWFG, Inc.'s net margin of 19.79%. TWFG, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.67% beat Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38%.

TWFG, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.38%. On the other hand Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $76.73 which suggests that it could grow by 75.93%. Given that Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has higher upside potential than TWFG, Inc., analysts believe Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is more attractive than TWFG, Inc..

TWFG, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.568, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.83%.

TWFG, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share. TWFG, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TWFG, Inc. quarterly revenues are $68.8M, which are smaller than Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues of $105.3M. TWFG, Inc.'s net income of $14.4M is lower than Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $20.8M. Notably, TWFG, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 48.86x while Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s PE ratio is 40.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TWFG, Inc. is 2.69x versus 4.05x for Goosehead Insurance, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.