CRD.A Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CorVel has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Crawford &'s net margin of 10.43%. Crawford &'s return on equity of 13.28% beat CorVel's return on equity of 32.6%.

Crawford & has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand CorVel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Crawford & has higher upside potential than CorVel, analysts believe Crawford & is more attractive than CorVel.

Crawford & has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.652% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CorVel has a beta of 1.155, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.453%.

Crawford & has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. CorVel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crawford & pays 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. CorVel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crawford &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crawford & quarterly revenues are $342.7M, which are larger than CorVel quarterly revenues of $224.4M. Crawford &'s net income of $9.5M is lower than CorVel's net income of $23.4M. Notably, Crawford &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.68x while CorVel's PE ratio is 69.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crawford & is 0.43x versus 6.70x for CorVel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

eHealth has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Crawford &'s net margin of -72.72%. Crawford &'s return on equity of 13.28% beat eHealth's return on equity of -5.64%.

Crawford & has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand eHealth has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could fall by -28.4%. Given that Crawford & has higher upside potential than eHealth, analysts believe Crawford & is more attractive than eHealth.

Crawford & has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.652% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eHealth has a beta of 0.311, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.95%.

Crawford & has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. eHealth offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crawford & pays 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth pays out -12.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Crawford &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crawford & quarterly revenues are $342.7M, which are larger than eHealth quarterly revenues of $58.4M. Crawford &'s net income of $9.5M is higher than eHealth's net income of -$42.5M. Notably, Crawford &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.68x while eHealth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crawford & is 0.43x versus 0.64x for eHealth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingstone Companies has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Crawford &'s net margin of 17.12%. Crawford &'s return on equity of 13.28% beat Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 40.22%.

Crawford & has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand Kingstone Companies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.11%. Given that Crawford & has higher upside potential than Kingstone Companies, analysts believe Crawford & is more attractive than Kingstone Companies.

Crawford & has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.652% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.211%.

Crawford & has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. Kingstone Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crawford & pays 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingstone Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crawford &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crawford & quarterly revenues are $342.7M, which are larger than Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues of $40.8M. Crawford &'s net income of $9.5M is higher than Kingstone Companies's net income of $7M. Notably, Crawford &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.68x while Kingstone Companies's PE ratio is 11.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crawford & is 0.43x versus 1.19x for Kingstone Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance Global Group has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Crawford &'s net margin of -24.33%. Crawford &'s return on equity of 13.28% beat Reliance Global Group's return on equity of -291.14%.

Crawford & has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand Reliance Global Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4307.41%. Given that Reliance Global Group has higher upside potential than Crawford &, analysts believe Reliance Global Group is more attractive than Crawford &.

Crawford & has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.652% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance Global Group has a beta of -0.021, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.104%.

Crawford & has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. Reliance Global Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crawford & pays 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance Global Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crawford &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crawford & quarterly revenues are $342.7M, which are larger than Reliance Global Group quarterly revenues of $3.4M. Crawford &'s net income of $9.5M is higher than Reliance Global Group's net income of -$837.3K. Notably, Crawford &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.68x while Reliance Global Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crawford & is 0.43x versus 0.12x for Reliance Global Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.