CRD.A Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Crawford & Co.'s net margin of 16.49%. Crawford & Co.'s return on equity of 19.65% beat Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.56%.

Crawford & Co. has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.95%. On the other hand Brown & Brown, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $84.07 which suggests that it could grow by 23.2%. Given that Crawford & Co. has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, Inc., analysts believe Crawford & Co. is more attractive than Brown & Brown, Inc..

Crawford & Co. has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.103% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.793, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.679%.

Crawford & Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Brown & Brown, Inc. offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Crawford & Co. pays 52.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays out 19.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crawford & Co. quarterly revenues are $333.6M, which are smaller than Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Crawford & Co.'s net income of $12.4M is lower than Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $265M. Notably, Crawford & Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.26x while Brown & Brown, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crawford & Co. is 0.39x versus 3.62x for Brown & Brown, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingstone Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Crawford & Co.'s net margin of 21.42%. Crawford & Co.'s return on equity of 19.65% beat Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 38.25%.

Crawford & Co. has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.95%. On the other hand Kingstone Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.50 which suggests that it could grow by 36.86%. Given that Kingstone Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Crawford & Co., analysts believe Kingstone Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Crawford & Co..

Crawford & Co. has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.103% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingstone Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.424, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.612%.

Crawford & Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Kingstone Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Crawford & Co. pays 52.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingstone Cos., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crawford & Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crawford & Co. quarterly revenues are $333.6M, which are larger than Kingstone Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.8M. Crawford & Co.'s net income of $12.4M is higher than Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s net income of $10.9M. Notably, Crawford & Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.26x while Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crawford & Co. is 0.39x versus 1.22x for Kingstone Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TWFG, Inc. has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Crawford & Co.'s net margin of 15.01%. Crawford & Co.'s return on equity of 19.65% beat TWFG, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.94%.

Crawford & Co. has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.95%. On the other hand TWFG, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $33.00 which suggests that it could grow by 79.74%. Given that TWFG, Inc. has higher upside potential than Crawford & Co., analysts believe TWFG, Inc. is more attractive than Crawford & Co..

Crawford & Co. has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.103% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TWFG, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Crawford & Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. TWFG, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crawford & Co. pays 52.37% of its earnings as a dividend. TWFG, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crawford & Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crawford & Co. quarterly revenues are $333.6M, which are larger than TWFG, Inc. quarterly revenues of $64.1M. Crawford & Co.'s net income of $12.4M is higher than TWFG, Inc.'s net income of $9.6M. Notably, Crawford & Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.26x while TWFG, Inc.'s PE ratio is 41.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crawford & Co. is 0.39x versus 2.02x for TWFG, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.