BWIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a net margin of -8.28% compared to Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net margin of 14.14%. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.3% beat Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39%.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 33.79%. On the other hand Brown & Brown, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $92.71 which suggests that it could grow by 16.01%. Given that Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, Inc., analysts believe Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is more attractive than Brown & Brown, Inc..

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.376, which suggesting that the stock is 37.603% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.769%.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brown & Brown, Inc. offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays out 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.4M, which are smaller than Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of -$30.2M is lower than Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M. Notably, Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Brown & Brown, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is 1.14x versus 4.35x for Brown & Brown, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CorVel Corp. has a net margin of -8.28% compared to Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net margin of 11.65%. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.3% beat CorVel Corp.'s return on equity of 32.69%.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 33.79%. On the other hand CorVel Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than CorVel Corp., analysts believe Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is more attractive than CorVel Corp..

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.376, which suggesting that the stock is 37.603% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CorVel Corp. has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.743%.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CorVel Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CorVel Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.4M, which are larger than CorVel Corp. quarterly revenues of $239.6M. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of -$30.2M is lower than CorVel Corp.'s net income of $27.9M. Notably, Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CorVel Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is 1.14x versus 3.79x for CorVel Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a net margin of -8.28% compared to Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net margin of 14.03%. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.3% beat Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38%.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 33.79%. On the other hand Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $91.55 which suggests that it could grow by 26.06%. Given that Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, Inc., analysts believe Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance, Inc..

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.376, which suggesting that the stock is 37.603% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.688%.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.4M, which are larger than Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues of $90.4M. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of -$30.2M is lower than Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $12.7M. Notably, Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s PE ratio is 63.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is 1.14x versus 7.23x for Goosehead Insurance, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a net margin of -8.28% compared to Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net margin of 11.89%. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.3% beat Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77%.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 33.79%. On the other hand Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $211.33 which suggests that it could grow by 12.81%. Given that Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., analysts believe Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is more attractive than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc..

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.376, which suggesting that the stock is 37.603% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.396%.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays out 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.4M, which are smaller than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of -$30.2M is lower than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M. Notably, Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is 1.14x versus 3.51x for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.