BWIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

eHealth, Inc. has a net margin of -8.28% compared to Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net margin of -58.83%. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.3% beat eHealth, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.62%.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 29.34%. On the other hand eHealth, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 107.32%. Given that eHealth, Inc. has higher upside potential than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc., analysts believe eHealth, Inc. is more attractive than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc..

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.354, which suggesting that the stock is 35.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eHealth, Inc. has a beta of 1.271, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.113%.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eHealth, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth, Inc. pays out -55.3% of its earnings as a dividend.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.4M, which are larger than eHealth, Inc. quarterly revenues of $53.9M. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of -$30.2M is higher than eHealth, Inc.'s net income of -$31.7M. Notably, Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while eHealth, Inc.'s PE ratio is 110.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is 1.18x versus 0.23x for eHealth, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a net margin of -8.28% compared to Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net margin of 14.03%. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.3% beat Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38%.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 29.34%. On the other hand Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $90.82 which suggests that it could grow by 20.61%. Given that Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, Inc., analysts believe Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance, Inc..

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.354, which suggesting that the stock is 35.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.525, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.464%.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.4M, which are larger than Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues of $90.4M. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of -$30.2M is lower than Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $12.7M. Notably, Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s PE ratio is 66.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is 1.18x versus 7.49x for Goosehead Insurance, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingstone Cos., Inc. has a net margin of -8.28% compared to Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net margin of 21.42%. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.3% beat Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 38.25%.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 29.34%. On the other hand Kingstone Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 45.41%. Given that Kingstone Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc., analysts believe Kingstone Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc..

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.354, which suggesting that the stock is 35.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingstone Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.420, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.043%.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingstone Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingstone Cos., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.4M, which are larger than Kingstone Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.8M. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of -$30.2M is lower than Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s net income of $10.9M. Notably, Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is 1.18x versus 1.18x for Kingstone Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance Global Group, Inc. has a net margin of -8.28% compared to Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net margin of -46.34%. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.3% beat Reliance Global Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -191.75%.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 29.34%. On the other hand Reliance Global Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 16066.29%. Given that Reliance Global Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc., analysts believe Reliance Global Group, Inc. is more attractive than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc..

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.354, which suggesting that the stock is 35.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance Global Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.081, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.885%.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reliance Global Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance Global Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $365.4M, which are larger than Reliance Global Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of -$30.2M is lower than Reliance Global Group, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Reliance Global Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is 1.18x versus 0.19x for Reliance Global Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.