THM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s net margin of -27.31%. International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of -7.41% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.5%. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.11 which suggests that it could grow by 22.47%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than International Tower Hill Mines Ltd., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than International Tower Hill Mines Ltd..

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.458% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s net income of -$732.3K is higher than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. is -- versus 49.16x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s net margin of -0.91%. International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of -7.41% beat McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43%.

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.5%. On the other hand McEwen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.60 which suggests that it could grow by 14.9%. Given that McEwen, Inc. has higher upside potential than International Tower Hill Mines Ltd., analysts believe McEwen, Inc. is more attractive than International Tower Hill Mines Ltd..

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.458% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.347%.

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s net income of -$732.3K is lower than McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K. Notably, International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while McEwen, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. is -- versus 6.34x for McEwen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of -7.41% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.5%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $55.78 which suggests that it could grow by 80.18%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than International Tower Hill Mines Ltd., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than International Tower Hill Mines Ltd..

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.458% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.933%.

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s net income of -$732.3K is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. is -- versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s net margin of -10.81%. International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of -7.41% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.5%. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.458% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 18.710, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1770.964%.

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s net income of -$732.3K is higher than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. is -- versus 0.02x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.