Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Buy
70
CNL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.91
Seasonality move
:
29.3%
Day range:
$13.84 - $14.23
52-week range:
$3.89 - $14.96
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
21.11x
Volume:
28.7K
Avg. volume:
56.8K
1-year change:
258.47%
Market cap:
$1.3B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.58
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNL
Collective Mining Ltd.
|
-- | -$0.12 | -- | -40.39% | $16.50 |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$6.3M | $0.02 | 1.34% | -100% | $5.11 |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
$59.6M | $0.28 | 112.69% | -- | $22.60 |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.03 | -- | -91.18% | $55.78 |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$60.6M | -- | -51.92% | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNL
Collective Mining Ltd.
|
$13.95 | $16.50 | $1.3B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
$1.77 | -- | $24.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$4.09 | $5.11 | $913.6M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 48.21x |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
$19.35 | $22.60 | $1.1B | 3.42x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.23x |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
$29.58 | $55.78 | $3.1B | 250.29x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$0.1109 | -- | $7.5M | 2.02x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.02x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNL
Collective Mining Ltd.
|
14.06% | -1.985 | 0.81% | 4.52x |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-- | 1.703 | -- | 43.32x |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
8.34% | 1.760 | 7.69% | 1.57x |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
20.73% | 1.903 | 13.71% | 1.33x |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
35.61% | 1.696 | 16.75% | 2.67x |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
28.31% | 172.414 | 51.97% | 0.37x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNL
Collective Mining Ltd.
|
-$203.5K | -$11.2M | -80.44% | -87.25% | -- | -$17.7M |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-$700 | -$313.5K | -19.82% | -19.82% | -- | -$934.5K |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$2.8M | $572K | -1.05% | -1.15% | 13.79% | $1.3M |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
$102K | -$7.6M | -2.04% | -2.43% | -15.09% | -$5.6M |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-$42.1K | -$3.4M | -3.35% | -5.31% | -- | -$40.1M |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$6.7M | $4.2M | 1.83% | 2.62% | -8.2% | $13.4M |
Collective Mining Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CNL or AUST?
Austin Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Collective Mining Ltd.'s net margin of --. Collective Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of -87.25% beat Austin Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -19.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNLCollective Mining Ltd.-- -$0.13 $70.9M AUSTAustin Gold Corp.-- -$0.02 $8.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CNL or AUST?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a consensus price target of $16.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.28%. On the other hand Austin Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 69.6%. Given that Austin Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Collective Mining Ltd., analysts believe Austin Gold Corp. is more attractive than Collective Mining Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNLCollective Mining Ltd.5 0 0 AUSTAustin Gold Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CNL or AUST More Risky?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Austin Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNL or AUST?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Austin Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Collective Mining Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Austin Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNL or AUST?
Collective Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Austin Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Collective Mining Ltd.'s net income of -$10.8M is lower than Austin Gold Corp.'s net income of -$270.8K. Notably, Collective Mining Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Austin Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Collective Mining Ltd. is -- versus -- for Austin Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNLCollective Mining Ltd.-- -- -- -$10.8M AUSTAustin Gold Corp.-- -- -- -$270.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns CNL or GROY?
Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Collective Mining Ltd.'s net margin of -27.31%. Collective Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of -87.25% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNLCollective Mining Ltd.-- -$0.13 $70.9M GROYGold Royalty Corp.68.47% -$0.01 $610.9M -
What do Analysts Say About CNL or GROY?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a consensus price target of $16.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.28%. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.11 which suggests that it could grow by 24.87%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Collective Mining Ltd., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Collective Mining Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNLCollective Mining Ltd.5 0 0 GROYGold Royalty Corp.3 0 0 -
Is CNL or GROY More Risky?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNL or GROY?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Collective Mining Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNL or GROY?
Collective Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Collective Mining Ltd.'s net income of -$10.8M is lower than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Collective Mining Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Collective Mining Ltd. is -- versus 48.21x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNLCollective Mining Ltd.-- -- -- -$10.8M GROYGold Royalty Corp.48.21x -- $4.1M -$1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNL or MUX?
McEwen, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Collective Mining Ltd.'s net margin of -0.91%. Collective Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of -87.25% beat McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNLCollective Mining Ltd.-- -$0.13 $70.9M MUXMcEwen, Inc.0.2% -$0.01 $616.3M -
What do Analysts Say About CNL or MUX?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a consensus price target of $16.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.28%. On the other hand McEwen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.60 which suggests that it could grow by 16.8%. Given that Collective Mining Ltd. has higher upside potential than McEwen, Inc., analysts believe Collective Mining Ltd. is more attractive than McEwen, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNLCollective Mining Ltd.5 0 0 MUXMcEwen, Inc.5 0 0 -
Is CNL or MUX More Risky?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.347%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNL or MUX?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Collective Mining Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNL or MUX?
Collective Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. Collective Mining Ltd.'s net income of -$10.8M is lower than McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K. Notably, Collective Mining Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while McEwen, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Collective Mining Ltd. is -- versus 6.23x for McEwen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNLCollective Mining Ltd.-- -- -- -$10.8M MUXMcEwen, Inc.6.23x 3.42x $50.5M -$462K
-
Which has Higher Returns CNL or SA?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Collective Mining Ltd.'s net margin of --. Collective Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of -87.25% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNLCollective Mining Ltd.-- -$0.13 $70.9M SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- -$0.23 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CNL or SA?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a consensus price target of $16.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.28%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $55.78 which suggests that it could grow by 88.59%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Collective Mining Ltd., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Collective Mining Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNLCollective Mining Ltd.5 0 0 SASeabridge Gold, Inc.3 0 0 -
Is CNL or SA More Risky?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.933%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNL or SA?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Collective Mining Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNL or SA?
Collective Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Collective Mining Ltd.'s net income of -$10.8M is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Collective Mining Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Collective Mining Ltd. is -- versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNLCollective Mining Ltd.-- -- -- -$10.8M SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- 250.29x -- -$23.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CNL or VITFF?
Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Collective Mining Ltd.'s net margin of -10.81%. Collective Mining Ltd.'s return on equity of -87.25% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNLCollective Mining Ltd.-- -$0.13 $70.9M VITFFVictoria Gold Corp.10.82% -$0.10 $608M -
What do Analysts Say About CNL or VITFF?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a consensus price target of $16.50, signalling upside risk potential of 18.28%. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Collective Mining Ltd. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe Collective Mining Ltd. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNLCollective Mining Ltd.5 0 0 VITFFVictoria Gold Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CNL or VITFF More Risky?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 18.710, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1770.964%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNL or VITFF?
Collective Mining Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Collective Mining Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNL or VITFF?
Collective Mining Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. Collective Mining Ltd.'s net income of -$10.8M is lower than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Collective Mining Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Collective Mining Ltd. is -- versus 0.02x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNLCollective Mining Ltd.-- -- -- -$10.8M VITFFVictoria Gold Corp.0.02x 2.02x $61.5M -$6.7M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.
