ELE.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of 20.01% compared to Elemental Royalty Corp.'s net margin of -5.8%. Elemental Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.17%.

Elemental Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of $37.88, signalling upside risk potential of 43.28%. On the other hand First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $22.41 which suggests that it could fall by -40.44%. Given that Elemental Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than First Quantum Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Elemental Royalty Corp. is more attractive than First Quantum Minerals Ltd..

Elemental Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.996% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Quantum Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 1.860, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.031%.

Elemental Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Elemental Royalty Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Quantum Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Elemental Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $9.5M, which are smaller than First Quantum Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Elemental Royalty Corp.'s net income of $1.9M is higher than First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$107.4M. Notably, Elemental Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 89.08x while First Quantum Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is 484.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elemental Royalty Corp. is 13.90x versus 4.44x for First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mako Mining Corp. has a net margin of 20.01% compared to Elemental Royalty Corp.'s net margin of 4.34%. Elemental Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat Mako Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 28.32%.

Elemental Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of $37.88, signalling upside risk potential of 43.28%. On the other hand Mako Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.65 which suggests that it could fall by -43.22%. Given that Elemental Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Mako Mining Corp., analysts believe Elemental Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Mako Mining Corp..

Elemental Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.996% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mako Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.295, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.525%.

Elemental Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mako Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Elemental Royalty Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mako Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Elemental Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $9.5M, which are smaller than Mako Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $38M. Elemental Royalty Corp.'s net income of $1.9M is higher than Mako Mining Corp.'s net income of $1.6M. Notably, Elemental Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 89.08x while Mako Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elemental Royalty Corp. is 13.90x versus 4.53x for Mako Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orezone Gold Corp. has a net margin of 20.01% compared to Elemental Royalty Corp.'s net margin of 10.7%. Elemental Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat Orezone Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 25.82%.

Elemental Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of $37.88, signalling upside risk potential of 43.28%. On the other hand Orezone Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.11 which suggests that it could grow by 55.77%. Given that Orezone Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Elemental Royalty Corp., analysts believe Orezone Gold Corp. is more attractive than Elemental Royalty Corp..

Elemental Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.996% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orezone Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.174, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.44%.

Elemental Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orezone Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Elemental Royalty Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orezone Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Elemental Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $9.5M, which are smaller than Orezone Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $95M. Elemental Royalty Corp.'s net income of $1.9M is lower than Orezone Gold Corp.'s net income of $10.2M. Notably, Elemental Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 89.08x while Orezone Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elemental Royalty Corp. is 13.90x versus 2.99x for Orezone Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Soma Gold Corp. has a net margin of 20.01% compared to Elemental Royalty Corp.'s net margin of 2.35%. Elemental Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat Soma Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 35.72%.

Elemental Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of $37.88, signalling upside risk potential of 43.28%. On the other hand Soma Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Elemental Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Soma Gold Corp., analysts believe Elemental Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Soma Gold Corp..

Elemental Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.996% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Soma Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.143, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.743%.

Elemental Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Soma Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Elemental Royalty Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Soma Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Elemental Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $9.5M, which are smaller than Soma Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $18.1M. Elemental Royalty Corp.'s net income of $1.9M is higher than Soma Gold Corp.'s net income of $425K. Notably, Elemental Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 89.08x while Soma Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elemental Royalty Corp. is 13.90x versus 2.05x for Soma Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.