ORE.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a net margin of 7.26% compared to Orezone Gold's net margin of 25.53%. Orezone Gold's return on equity of 17.47% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International's return on equity of -167.71%.

Orezone Gold has a consensus price target of $1.67, signalling upside risk potential of 159.68%. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Orezone Gold has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, analysts believe Orezone Gold is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International.

Orezone Gold has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.161% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Orezone Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Orezone Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Orezone Gold quarterly revenues are $93.7M, which are larger than Bee Vectoring Technologies International quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Orezone Gold's net income of $6.8M is higher than Bee Vectoring Technologies International's net income of $20.9K. Notably, Orezone Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.52x while Bee Vectoring Technologies International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Orezone Gold is 0.68x versus 1.37x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Replenish Nutrients Holding has a net margin of 7.26% compared to Orezone Gold's net margin of 83.06%. Orezone Gold's return on equity of 17.47% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding's return on equity of -1.35%.

Orezone Gold has a consensus price target of $1.67, signalling upside risk potential of 159.68%. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1025%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding has higher upside potential than Orezone Gold, analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding is more attractive than Orezone Gold.

Orezone Gold has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.161% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding has a beta of 1.133, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.276%.

Orezone Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Orezone Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Orezone Gold quarterly revenues are $93.7M, which are larger than Replenish Nutrients Holding quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Orezone Gold's net income of $6.8M is higher than Replenish Nutrients Holding's net income of $1.8M. Notably, Orezone Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.52x while Replenish Nutrients Holding's PE ratio is 67.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Orezone Gold is 0.68x versus 0.72x for Replenish Nutrients Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Iamgold has a net margin of 7.26% compared to Orezone Gold's net margin of 21.93%. Orezone Gold's return on equity of 17.47% beat Iamgold's return on equity of 28.34%.

Orezone Gold has a consensus price target of $1.67, signalling upside risk potential of 159.68%. On the other hand Iamgold has an analysts' consensus of $10.53 which suggests that it could grow by 41.1%. Given that Orezone Gold has higher upside potential than Iamgold, analysts believe Orezone Gold is more attractive than Iamgold.

Orezone Gold has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.161% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iamgold has a beta of 1.423, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.325%.

Orezone Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Iamgold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Orezone Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Iamgold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Orezone Gold quarterly revenues are $93.7M, which are smaller than Iamgold quarterly revenues of $598.8M. Orezone Gold's net income of $6.8M is lower than Iamgold's net income of $810.6M. Notably, Orezone Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.52x while Iamgold's PE ratio is 4.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Orezone Gold is 0.68x versus 1.96x for Iamgold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Organic Potash has a net margin of 7.26% compared to Orezone Gold's net margin of --. Orezone Gold's return on equity of 17.47% beat Organic Potash's return on equity of --.

Orezone Gold has a consensus price target of $1.67, signalling upside risk potential of 159.68%. On the other hand Organic Potash has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Orezone Gold has higher upside potential than Organic Potash, analysts believe Orezone Gold is more attractive than Organic Potash.

Orezone Gold has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.161% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organic Potash has a beta of 0.508, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.183%.

Orezone Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Organic Potash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Orezone Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Organic Potash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Orezone Gold quarterly revenues are $93.7M, which are larger than Organic Potash quarterly revenues of --. Orezone Gold's net income of $6.8M is higher than Organic Potash's net income of -$23.7K. Notably, Orezone Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.52x while Organic Potash's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Orezone Gold is 0.68x versus -- for Organic Potash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.