FNV.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of 58.93% compared to Franco-Nevada Corp.'s net margin of 17.63%. Franco-Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of 14.43% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.28%.

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a consensus price target of $370.79, signalling upside risk potential of 3.49%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.71 which suggests that it could grow by 19.39%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Franco-Nevada Corp., analysts believe Hudbay Minerals, Inc. is more attractive than Franco-Nevada Corp..

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a beta of 0.879, which suggesting that the stock is 12.081% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.850, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.991%.

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.59%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Franco-Nevada Corp. pays 50.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franco-Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues are $672M, which are smaller than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Franco-Nevada Corp.'s net income of $396M is higher than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $178.5M. Notably, Franco-Nevada Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.81x while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franco-Nevada Corp. is 32.00x versus 4.47x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinross Gold Corp. has a net margin of 58.93% compared to Franco-Nevada Corp.'s net margin of 45.13%. Franco-Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of 14.43% beat Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 31.72%.

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a consensus price target of $370.79, signalling upside risk potential of 3.49%. On the other hand Kinross Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $54.38 which suggests that it could grow by 17.79%. Given that Kinross Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Franco-Nevada Corp., analysts believe Kinross Gold Corp. is more attractive than Franco-Nevada Corp..

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a beta of 0.879, which suggesting that the stock is 12.081% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.264, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.428%.

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.59%. Kinross Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Franco-Nevada Corp. pays 50.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold Corp. pays out 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franco-Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues are $672M, which are smaller than Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Franco-Nevada Corp.'s net income of $396M is lower than Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, Franco-Nevada Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.81x while Kinross Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franco-Nevada Corp. is 32.00x versus 5.74x for Kinross Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orezone Gold Corp. has a net margin of 58.93% compared to Franco-Nevada Corp.'s net margin of 25.57%. Franco-Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of 14.43% beat Orezone Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 22.79%.

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a consensus price target of $370.79, signalling upside risk potential of 3.49%. On the other hand Orezone Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.11 which suggests that it could grow by 79.59%. Given that Orezone Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Franco-Nevada Corp., analysts believe Orezone Gold Corp. is more attractive than Franco-Nevada Corp..

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a beta of 0.879, which suggesting that the stock is 12.081% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orezone Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.200, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.012%.

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.59%. Orezone Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franco-Nevada Corp. pays 50.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Orezone Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franco-Nevada Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franco-Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues are $672M, which are larger than Orezone Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $181.9M. Franco-Nevada Corp.'s net income of $396M is higher than Orezone Gold Corp.'s net income of $46.5M. Notably, Franco-Nevada Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.81x while Orezone Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franco-Nevada Corp. is 32.00x versus 2.37x for Orezone Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.