FNV.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of 58.93% compared to Franco-Nevada Corp.'s net margin of 65.8%. Franco-Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of 14.43% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.25%.

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a consensus price target of $200.45, signalling downside risk potential of -40.47%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.49 which suggests that it could fall by -42.85%. Given that Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has more downside risk than Franco-Nevada Corp., analysts believe Franco-Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals, Inc..

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 28.989% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.423%.

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Franco-Nevada Corp. pays 50.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franco-Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues are $672M, which are larger than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.5M. Franco-Nevada Corp.'s net income of $396M is higher than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $306.3M. Notably, Franco-Nevada Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 50.57x while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franco-Nevada Corp. is 30.07x versus 4.79x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinross Gold Corp. has a net margin of 58.93% compared to Franco-Nevada Corp.'s net margin of 33.8%. Franco-Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of 14.43% beat Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97%.

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a consensus price target of $200.45, signalling downside risk potential of -40.47%. On the other hand Kinross Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $25.80 which suggests that it could fall by -41.1%. Given that Kinross Gold Corp. has more downside risk than Franco-Nevada Corp., analysts believe Franco-Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Kinross Gold Corp..

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 28.989% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.895%.

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Kinross Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Franco-Nevada Corp. pays 50.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold Corp. pays out 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franco-Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues are $672M, which are smaller than Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Franco-Nevada Corp.'s net income of $396M is lower than Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M. Notably, Franco-Nevada Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 50.57x while Kinross Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franco-Nevada Corp. is 30.07x versus 5.98x for Kinross Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orezone Gold Corp. has a net margin of 58.93% compared to Franco-Nevada Corp.'s net margin of 10.7%. Franco-Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of 14.43% beat Orezone Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 25.82%.

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a consensus price target of $200.45, signalling downside risk potential of -40.47%. On the other hand Orezone Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.11 which suggests that it could grow by 55.77%. Given that Orezone Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Franco-Nevada Corp., analysts believe Orezone Gold Corp. is more attractive than Franco-Nevada Corp..

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 28.989% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orezone Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.174, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.44%.

Franco-Nevada Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Orezone Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franco-Nevada Corp. pays 50.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Orezone Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franco-Nevada Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franco-Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues are $672M, which are larger than Orezone Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $95M. Franco-Nevada Corp.'s net income of $396M is higher than Orezone Gold Corp.'s net income of $10.2M. Notably, Franco-Nevada Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 50.57x while Orezone Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franco-Nevada Corp. is 30.07x versus 2.99x for Orezone Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.