Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Buy
80
K.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$38.82
Seasonality move
:
4.29%
Day range:
$37.80 - $40.25
52-week range:
$12.97 - $40.26
Dividend yield:
0.46%
P/E ratio:
19.24x
P/S ratio:
5.25x
P/B ratio:
4.19x
Volume:
4.6M
Avg. volume:
4M
1-year change:
168.95%
Market cap:
$46.4B
Revenue:
$7.1B
EPS (TTM):
$2.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$2.5B | $0.55 | 42.84% | 147.78% | $39.36 |
|
ABX.TO
Barrick Mining Corp.
|
$6.1B | $0.86 | 39.06% | 54.03% | $64.69 |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$4.1B | $2.74 | 50.97% | 142.84% | $269.30 |
|
CG.TO
Centerra Gold, Inc.
|
$498.2M | $0.35 | 9.06% | 92.14% | $20.00 |
|
FNV.TO
Franco-Nevada Corp.
|
$646.1M | $1.93 | 70.85% | 71.92% | $340.50 |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$345.2M | $0.26 | 38.25% | 713.82% | $13.29 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$38.46 | $39.36 | $46.4B | 19.24x | $0.05 | 0.46% | 5.25x |
|
ABX.TO
Barrick Mining Corp.
|
$59.26 | $64.69 | $100B | 20.45x | $0.25 | 1.24% | 5.01x |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$231.62 | $269.30 | $116.3B | 24.23x | $0.56 | 0.97% | 7.90x |
|
CG.TO
Centerra Gold, Inc.
|
$19.51 | $20.00 | $3.9B | 8.59x | $0.07 | 1.44% | 2.36x |
|
FNV.TO
Franco-Nevada Corp.
|
$295.69 | $340.50 | $57B | 44.41x | $0.53 | 0.72% | 26.41x |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$13.44 | $13.29 | $4.1B | 13.02x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.97x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
13.66% | 2.146 | 4.17% | 1.48x |
|
ABX.TO
Barrick Mining Corp.
|
15.79% | 2.580 | 7.34% | 1.84x |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
1.41% | 1.516 | 0.4% | 1.13x |
|
CG.TO
Centerra Gold, Inc.
|
0.9% | 2.443 | 0.82% | 1.95x |
|
FNV.TO
Franco-Nevada Corp.
|
0.12% | 1.482 | 0.02% | 3.66x |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
11.65% | 1.300 | 7.62% | 2.35x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$1.2B | $1.1B | 21.05% | 24.97% | 42.8% | $922.9M |
|
ABX.TO
Barrick Mining Corp.
|
$3B | $2.9B | 13.4% | 15.3% | 49.86% | $2.1B |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$2.4B | $2.3B | 15.08% | 15.8% | 53.69% | $1.6B |
|
CG.TO
Centerra Gold, Inc.
|
$134.1M | $103.5M | 19.03% | 19.24% | 19.93% | $137.4M |
|
FNV.TO
Franco-Nevada Corp.
|
$487.2M | $464.7M | 14.41% | 14.43% | 69.15% | $90.3M |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$180.4M | $145M | 14.87% | 16.82% | 42.05% | $86.6M |
Kinross Gold Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or ABX.TO?
Barrick Mining Corp. has a net margin of 33.8% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 45.79%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Barrick Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 15.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B ABX.TOBarrick Mining Corp.51.71% $1.05 $53.7B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or ABX.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $39.36, signalling upside risk potential of 2.35%. On the other hand Barrick Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $64.69 which suggests that it could grow by 9.16%. Given that Barrick Mining Corp. has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold Corp., analysts believe Barrick Mining Corp. is more attractive than Kinross Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 ABX.TOBarrick Mining Corp.12 2 1 -
Is K.TO or ABX.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 15.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Barrick Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.840, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.034%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or ABX.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Barrick Mining Corp. offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Barrick Mining Corp. pays out 33.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or ABX.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Barrick Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M is lower than Barrick Mining Corp.'s net income of $2.6B. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.24x while Barrick Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 20.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.25x versus 5.01x for Barrick Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.25x 19.24x $2.5B $838.9M ABX.TOBarrick Mining Corp.5.01x 20.45x $5.7B $2.6B
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or AEM.TO?
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a net margin of 33.8% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 34.48%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.56.57% $2.89 $33.2B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or AEM.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $39.36, signalling upside risk potential of 2.35%. On the other hand Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $269.30 which suggests that it could grow by 16.27%. Given that Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold Corp., analysts believe Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Kinross Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.11 3 1 -
Is K.TO or AEM.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 15.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.455%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or AEM.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. pays out 42.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or AEM.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M is lower than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.24x while Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.25x versus 7.90x for Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.25x 19.24x $2.5B $838.9M AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.7.90x 24.23x $4.2B $1.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or CG.TO?
Centerra Gold, Inc. has a net margin of 33.8% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 77.47%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Centerra Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B CG.TOCenterra Gold, Inc.25.82% $1.98 $2.7B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or CG.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $39.36, signalling upside risk potential of 2.35%. On the other hand Centerra Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.49%. Given that Centerra Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold Corp., analysts believe Centerra Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Kinross Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 CG.TOCenterra Gold, Inc.3 4 1 -
Is K.TO or CG.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 15.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Centerra Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.481%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or CG.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Centerra Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Centerra Gold, Inc. pays out 54.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or CG.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Centerra Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of $519.5M. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M is higher than Centerra Gold, Inc.'s net income of $402.4M. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.24x while Centerra Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.25x versus 2.36x for Centerra Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.25x 19.24x $2.5B $838.9M CG.TOCenterra Gold, Inc.2.36x 8.59x $519.5M $402.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or FNV.TO?
Franco-Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 33.8% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 58.93%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Franco-Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of 14.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B FNV.TOFranco-Nevada Corp.72.49% $2.05 $9.8B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or FNV.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $39.36, signalling upside risk potential of 2.35%. On the other hand Franco-Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $340.50 which suggests that it could grow by 15.16%. Given that Franco-Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold Corp., analysts believe Franco-Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Kinross Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 FNV.TOFranco-Nevada Corp.7 6 0 -
Is K.TO or FNV.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 15.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franco-Nevada Corp. has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.517%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or FNV.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Franco-Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Franco-Nevada Corp. pays out 50.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or FNV.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Franco-Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of $672M. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M is higher than Franco-Nevada Corp.'s net income of $396M. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.24x while Franco-Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is 44.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.25x versus 26.41x for Franco-Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.25x 19.24x $2.5B $838.9M FNV.TOFranco-Nevada Corp.26.41x 44.41x $672M $396M
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or FVI.TO?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a net margin of 33.8% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 51.21%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Fortuna Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B FVI.TOFortuna Mining Corp.52.32% $0.51 $2.6B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or FVI.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $39.36, signalling upside risk potential of 2.35%. On the other hand Fortuna Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.29 which suggests that it could fall by -1.1%. Given that Kinross Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Fortuna Mining Corp., analysts believe Kinross Gold Corp. is more attractive than Fortuna Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 FVI.TOFortuna Mining Corp.1 0 1 -
Is K.TO or FVI.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.152, which suggesting that the stock is 15.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fortuna Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.561, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.095%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or FVI.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Fortuna Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortuna Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or FVI.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Fortuna Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $344.8M. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M is higher than Fortuna Mining Corp.'s net income of $176.6M. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.24x while Fortuna Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.25x versus 2.97x for Fortuna Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.25x 19.24x $2.5B $838.9M FVI.TOFortuna Mining Corp.2.97x 13.02x $344.8M $176.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
73
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
FEIM alert for Dec 15
Frequency Electronics, Inc. [FEIM] is down 3.51% over the past day.
Buy
57
MOD alert for Dec 15
Modine Manufacturing Co. [MOD] is up 1.79% over the past day.
Sell
42
OKLO alert for Dec 15
Oklo, Inc. [OKLO] is down 5.81% over the past day.
