Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Buy
62
K.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.54
Seasonality move
:
3.1%
Day range:
$13.15 - $13.50
52-week range:
$6.46 - $14.97
Dividend yield:
1.23%
P/E ratio:
16.40x
P/S ratio:
2.51x
P/B ratio:
1.84x
Volume:
3.6M
Avg. volume:
3.5M
1-year change:
63.74%
Market cap:
$16.5B
Revenue:
$5.7B
EPS (TTM):
$0.82
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold
|
$1.8B | $0.26 | 39.56% | 390.67% | $13.84 |
|
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold
|
$4.6B | $0.44 | 8.63% | 32.3% | $30.57 |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines
|
$2.9B | $1.41 | 28.36% | 193.97% | $138.76 |
|
IMG.TO
Iamgold
|
$593.7M | $0.14 | 82.41% | -54.13% | $10.53 |
|
PUMA.V
Puma Exploration
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WGO.V
White Gold
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold
|
$13.41 | $13.84 | $16.5B | 16.40x | $0.04 | 1.23% | 2.51x |
|
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold
|
$22.39 | $30.57 | $39.1B | 17.68x | $0.14 | 2.44% | 2.34x |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines
|
$113.33 | $138.76 | $56.8B | 41.61x | $0.56 | 1.93% | 5.32x |
|
IMG.TO
Iamgold
|
$7.46 | $10.53 | $4.3B | 4.31x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.96x |
|
PUMA.V
Puma Exploration
|
$0.08 | -- | $12.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
WGO.V
White Gold
|
$0.21 | -- | $37M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold
|
20.22% | 0.487 | 14.43% | 0.47x |
|
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold
|
16.55% | 0.606 | 10.77% | 1.62x |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines
|
6.68% | 0.995 | 3.63% | 0.69x |
|
IMG.TO
Iamgold
|
19.94% | 0.543 | 26.52% | 0.56x |
|
PUMA.V
Puma Exploration
|
-- | -0.792 | -- | -- |
|
WGO.V
White Gold
|
-- | 1.561 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold
|
$880.8M | $733.4M | 8.77% | 11.69% | 37.56% | $618.7M |
|
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold
|
$1.8B | $1.5B | 4.42% | 5.08% | 35.1% | $604.3M |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines
|
$1.3B | $1.2B | 4.7% | 5.12% | 40.28% | $837M |
|
IMG.TO
Iamgold
|
$221.8M | $199.2M | 21.48% | 28.34% | 146.69% | $121.6M |
|
PUMA.V
Puma Exploration
|
-$2.7K | -$435.4K | -- | -- | -- | -$667.6K |
|
WGO.V
White Gold
|
-$33.4K | -$644.6K | -- | -- | -- | -$1.9M |
Kinross Gold vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or ABX.TO?
Barrick Gold has a net margin of 24.81% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 14.34%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 11.69% beat Barrick Gold's return on equity of 5.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold45.08% $0.40 $11.5B ABX.TOBarrick Gold39.1% $0.38 $50.8B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or ABX.TO?
Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $13.84, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand Barrick Gold has an analysts' consensus of $30.57 which suggests that it could grow by 45.25%. Given that Barrick Gold has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold, analysts believe Barrick Gold is more attractive than Kinross Gold.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold6 4 1 ABX.TOBarrick Gold9 7 0 -
Is K.TO or ABX.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.714% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Barrick Gold has a beta of 0.420, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.05%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or ABX.TO?
Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Barrick Gold offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Kinross Gold pays 35.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Barrick Gold pays out 55.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or ABX.TO?
Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Barrick Gold quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Kinross Gold's net income of $484.8M is lower than Barrick Gold's net income of $659M. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.40x while Barrick Gold's PE ratio is 17.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 2.51x versus 2.34x for Barrick Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold2.51x 16.40x $2B $484.8M ABX.TOBarrick Gold2.34x 17.68x $4.6B $659M
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or AEM.TO?
Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 24.81% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 26.31%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 11.69% beat Agnico Eagle Mines's return on equity of 5.12%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold45.08% $0.40 $11.5B AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines45.54% $1.54 $29.7B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or AEM.TO?
Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $13.84, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand Agnico Eagle Mines has an analysts' consensus of $138.76 which suggests that it could grow by 22.44%. Given that Kinross Gold has higher upside potential than Agnico Eagle Mines, analysts believe Kinross Gold is more attractive than Agnico Eagle Mines.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold6 4 1 AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines9 1 1 -
Is K.TO or AEM.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.714% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 1.064, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.442%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or AEM.TO?
Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Agnico Eagle Mines offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Kinross Gold pays 35.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 32.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or AEM.TO?
Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Agnico Eagle Mines quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Kinross Gold's net income of $484.8M is lower than Agnico Eagle Mines's net income of $773.8M. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.40x while Agnico Eagle Mines's PE ratio is 41.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 2.51x versus 5.32x for Agnico Eagle Mines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold2.51x 16.40x $2B $484.8M AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines5.32x 41.61x $2.9B $773.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or IMG.TO?
Iamgold has a net margin of 24.81% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 21.93%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 11.69% beat Iamgold's return on equity of 28.34%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold45.08% $0.40 $11.5B IMG.TOIamgold37.05% $1.41 $5.6B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or IMG.TO?
Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $13.84, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand Iamgold has an analysts' consensus of $10.53 which suggests that it could grow by 41.1%. Given that Iamgold has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold, analysts believe Iamgold is more attractive than Kinross Gold.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold6 4 1 IMG.TOIamgold4 3 1 -
Is K.TO or IMG.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.714% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iamgold has a beta of 1.423, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.325%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or IMG.TO?
Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Iamgold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold pays 35.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Iamgold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or IMG.TO?
Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Iamgold quarterly revenues of $598.8M. Kinross Gold's net income of $484.8M is lower than Iamgold's net income of $810.6M. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.40x while Iamgold's PE ratio is 4.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 2.51x versus 1.96x for Iamgold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold2.51x 16.40x $2B $484.8M IMG.TOIamgold1.96x 4.31x $598.8M $810.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or PUMA.V?
Puma Exploration has a net margin of 24.81% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of --. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 11.69% beat Puma Exploration's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold45.08% $0.40 $11.5B PUMA.VPuma Exploration-- -$0.00 -- -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or PUMA.V?
Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $13.84, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand Puma Exploration has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 473.33%. Given that Puma Exploration has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold, analysts believe Puma Exploration is more attractive than Kinross Gold.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold6 4 1 PUMA.VPuma Exploration0 0 0 -
Is K.TO or PUMA.V More Risky?
Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.714% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Puma Exploration has a beta of 1.574, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.442%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or PUMA.V?
Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Puma Exploration offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold pays 35.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Puma Exploration pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or PUMA.V?
Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Puma Exploration quarterly revenues of --. Kinross Gold's net income of $484.8M is higher than Puma Exploration's net income of -$432.6K. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.40x while Puma Exploration's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 2.51x versus -- for Puma Exploration. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold2.51x 16.40x $2B $484.8M PUMA.VPuma Exploration-- -- -- -$432.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or WGO.V?
White Gold has a net margin of 24.81% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of --. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 11.69% beat White Gold's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold45.08% $0.40 $11.5B WGO.VWhite Gold-- -$0.01 -- -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or WGO.V?
Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $13.84, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand White Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 900%. Given that White Gold has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold, analysts believe White Gold is more attractive than Kinross Gold.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold6 4 1 WGO.VWhite Gold0 0 0 -
Is K.TO or WGO.V More Risky?
Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.714% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison White Gold has a beta of 1.469, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.853%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or WGO.V?
Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. White Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold pays 35.38% of its earnings as a dividend. White Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or WGO.V?
Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than White Gold quarterly revenues of --. Kinross Gold's net income of $484.8M is higher than White Gold's net income of -$681.1K. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.40x while White Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 2.51x versus -- for White Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold2.51x 16.40x $2B $484.8M WGO.VWhite Gold-- -- -- -$681.1K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
52
TSLL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
73
PSIX alert for Dec 24
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Sell
31
SOXL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares [SOXL] is up 11.87% over the past day.
