Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Buy
60
K.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$46.02
Seasonality move
:
4.22%
Day range:
$43.71 - $44.87
52-week range:
$14.89 - $53.57
Dividend yield:
0.4%
P/E ratio:
21.92x
P/S ratio:
5.98x
P/B ratio:
4.78x
Volume:
5.9M
Avg. volume:
5M
1-year change:
156.95%
Market cap:
$52.9B
Revenue:
$7.1B
EPS (TTM):
$2.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$1.5B | $0.42 | -30.13% | 35.82% | $25.80 |
|
ABX.TO
Barrick Mining Corp.
|
$3.8B | $0.64 | -16.89% | 50.78% | $40.97 |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$2.5B | $1.93 | -20.2% | 6.26% | $165.08 |
|
ASM.TO
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
|
$40.5M | $0.03 | 136.93% | 203.19% | $9.45 |
|
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
|
$1.4B | $0.17 | 69.67% | 274.21% | $14.20 |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$368.5M | $0.17 | -14.29% | 100.77% | $9.38 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$43.81 | $25.80 | $52.9B | 21.92x | $0.05 | 0.4% | 5.98x |
|
ABX.TO
Barrick Mining Corp.
|
$61.75 | $40.97 | $103.5B | 15.05x | $0.25 | 1.19% | 4.48x |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$268.94 | $165.08 | $135B | 28.13x | $0.56 | 0.83% | 9.17x |
|
ASM.TO
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
|
$13.84 | $9.45 | $2.2B | 68.04x | $0.00 | 0% | 16.97x |
|
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
|
$19.95 | $14.20 | $15.7B | 309.78x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.43x |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$14.21 | $9.38 | $4.3B | 13.77x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.14x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
13.66% | 1.629 | 4.17% | 1.48x |
|
ABX.TO
Barrick Mining Corp.
|
15.05% | 2.549 | 5.71% | 1.99x |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
1.41% | 0.642 | 0.4% | 1.13x |
|
ASM.TO
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
|
2.5% | 1.057 | 0.58% | 2.15x |
|
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
|
25.8% | 3.739 | 22.09% | 0.37x |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
11.65% | 0.434 | 7.62% | 2.35x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$1.2B | $1.1B | 21.05% | 24.97% | 42.8% | $922.9M |
|
ABX.TO
Barrick Mining Corp.
|
$4.3B | $4.2B | 18.37% | 20.91% | 50.68% | $2.4B |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$2.4B | $2.3B | 15.08% | 15.8% | 53.69% | $1.6B |
|
ASM.TO
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
|
$14M | $10M | 14.79% | 15.24% | 33.77% | -$12.3M |
|
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
|
$369.4M | $282.6M | 1.01% | 1.42% | 25.05% | -$40.9M |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$180.4M | $145M | 14.87% | 16.82% | 42.05% | $86.6M |
Kinross Gold Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or ABX.TO?
Barrick Mining Corp. has a net margin of 33.8% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 54.08%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Barrick Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 20.91%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B ABX.TOBarrick Mining Corp.51.76% $2.00 $55.7B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or ABX.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling downside risk potential of -41.1%. On the other hand Barrick Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $40.97 which suggests that it could fall by -35.1%. Given that Kinross Gold Corp. has more downside risk than Barrick Mining Corp., analysts believe Barrick Mining Corp. is more attractive than Kinross Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 ABX.TOBarrick Mining Corp.11 2 2 -
Is K.TO or ABX.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.895% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Barrick Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.828, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.168%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or ABX.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. Barrick Mining Corp. offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Barrick Mining Corp. pays out 24.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or ABX.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Barrick Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M is lower than Barrick Mining Corp.'s net income of $4.5B. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.92x while Barrick Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.98x versus 4.48x for Barrick Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.98x 21.92x $2.5B $838.9M ABX.TOBarrick Mining Corp.4.48x 15.05x $8.3B $4.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or AEM.TO?
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a net margin of 33.8% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 34.48%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.56.57% $2.89 $33.2B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or AEM.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling downside risk potential of -41.1%. On the other hand Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $165.08 which suggests that it could fall by -38.62%. Given that Kinross Gold Corp. has more downside risk than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd., analysts believe Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Kinross Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.11 5 1 -
Is K.TO or AEM.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.895% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.085%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or AEM.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. pays out 42.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or AEM.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M is lower than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.92x while Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is 28.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.98x versus 9.17x for Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.98x 21.92x $2.5B $838.9M AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.9.17x 28.13x $4.2B $1.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or ASM.TO?
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. has a net margin of 33.8% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 35.95%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B ASM.TOAvino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.47.55% $0.07 $259.9M -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or ASM.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling downside risk potential of -41.1%. On the other hand Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $9.45 which suggests that it could fall by -31.72%. Given that Kinross Gold Corp. has more downside risk than Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd., analysts believe Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Kinross Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 ASM.TOAvino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.3 1 0 -
Is K.TO or ASM.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.895% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. has a beta of 2.522, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.187%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or ASM.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or ASM.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $29.5M. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M is higher than Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.92x while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is 68.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.98x versus 16.97x for Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.98x 21.92x $2.5B $838.9M ASM.TOAvino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.16.97x 68.04x $29.5M $10.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or EQX.TO?
Equinox Gold Corp. has a net margin of 33.8% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 10.45%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Equinox Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 1.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B EQX.TOEquinox Gold Corp.32.75% $0.15 $10.5B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or EQX.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling downside risk potential of -41.1%. On the other hand Equinox Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $14.20 which suggests that it could fall by -28.83%. Given that Kinross Gold Corp. has more downside risk than Equinox Gold Corp., analysts believe Equinox Gold Corp. is more attractive than Kinross Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 EQX.TOEquinox Gold Corp.6 1 0 -
Is K.TO or EQX.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.895% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equinox Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.925, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.53%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or EQX.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. Equinox Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinox Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or EQX.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Equinox Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M is higher than Equinox Gold Corp.'s net income of $117.9M. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.92x while Equinox Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 309.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.98x versus 3.43x for Equinox Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.98x 21.92x $2.5B $838.9M EQX.TOEquinox Gold Corp.3.43x 309.78x $1.1B $117.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or FVI.TO?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a net margin of 33.8% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 51.21%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Fortuna Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B FVI.TOFortuna Mining Corp.52.32% $0.51 $2.6B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or FVI.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling downside risk potential of -41.1%. On the other hand Fortuna Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $9.38 which suggests that it could fall by -34.01%. Given that Kinross Gold Corp. has more downside risk than Fortuna Mining Corp., analysts believe Fortuna Mining Corp. is more attractive than Kinross Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 FVI.TOFortuna Mining Corp.1 1 0 -
Is K.TO or FVI.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.895% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fortuna Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.548, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.765%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or FVI.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.4%. Fortuna Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortuna Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or FVI.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Fortuna Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $344.8M. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M is higher than Fortuna Mining Corp.'s net income of $176.6M. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.92x while Fortuna Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.98x versus 3.14x for Fortuna Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.98x 21.92x $2.5B $838.9M FVI.TOFortuna Mining Corp.3.14x 13.77x $344.8M $176.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Alerts
Sell
40
BILL alert for Feb 9
Bill Holdings, Inc. [BILL] is up 3.7% over the past day.
Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 9
Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is down 2.16% over the past day.
Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 9
Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 2.59% over the past day.
