K.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a net margin of 45.13% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 42.74%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 31.72% beat Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 19.64%.

Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $54.38, signalling upside risk potential of 17.79%. On the other hand Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $325.65 which suggests that it could grow by 1.62%. Given that Kinross Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd., analysts believe Kinross Gold Corp. is more attractive than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd..

Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.264, which suggesting that the stock is 26.428% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.538%.

Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. pays out 18.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5B. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $1.3B is lower than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s net income of $2.1B. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.91x while Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is 25.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.74x versus 9.69x for Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Equinox Gold Corp. has a net margin of 45.13% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 12.08%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 31.72% beat Equinox Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.41%.

Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $54.38, signalling upside risk potential of 17.79%. On the other hand Equinox Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $28.20 which suggests that it could grow by 19.71%. Given that Equinox Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold Corp., analysts believe Equinox Gold Corp. is more attractive than Kinross Gold Corp..

Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.264, which suggesting that the stock is 26.428% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equinox Gold Corp. has a beta of 2.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.632%.

Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. Equinox Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinox Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Equinox Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $950.1M. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than Equinox Gold Corp.'s net income of $114.8M. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.91x while Equinox Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 71.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.74x versus 4.45x for Equinox Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fortuna Mining Corp. has a net margin of 45.13% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 27.62%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 31.72% beat Fortuna Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 19.94%.

Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $54.38, signalling upside risk potential of 17.79%. On the other hand Fortuna Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $18.52 which suggests that it could grow by 10.52%. Given that Kinross Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Fortuna Mining Corp., analysts believe Kinross Gold Corp. is more attractive than Fortuna Mining Corp..

Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.264, which suggesting that the stock is 26.428% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fortuna Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.809, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.945%.

Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. Fortuna Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortuna Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Fortuna Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $373.6M. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than Fortuna Mining Corp.'s net income of $103.2M. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.91x while Fortuna Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.74x versus 3.63x for Fortuna Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pan American Silver Corp. has a net margin of 45.13% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 38.32%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 31.72% beat Pan American Silver Corp.'s return on equity of 17.4%.

Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $54.38, signalling upside risk potential of 17.79%. On the other hand Pan American Silver Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $97.45 which suggests that it could grow by 15.75%. Given that Kinross Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Pan American Silver Corp., analysts believe Kinross Gold Corp. is more attractive than Pan American Silver Corp..

Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.264, which suggesting that the stock is 26.428% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pan American Silver Corp. has a beta of 1.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.245%.

Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. Pan American Silver Corp. offers a yield of 0.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Pan American Silver Corp. pays out 18.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Pan American Silver Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than Pan American Silver Corp.'s net income of $630.1M. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.91x while Pan American Silver Corp.'s PE ratio is 24.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.74x versus 6.35x for Pan American Silver Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.