Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
80
K.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$38.84
Seasonality move
:
4.23%
Day range:
$37.42 - $39.30
52-week range:
$13.84 - $40.96
Dividend yield:
0.45%
P/E ratio:
19.43x
P/S ratio:
5.30x
P/B ratio:
4.23x
Volume:
2.7M
Avg. volume:
3.9M
1-year change:
172.56%
Market cap:
$46.9B
Revenue:
$7.1B
EPS (TTM):
$2.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$2.7B | $0.88 | 44.45% | 145.02% | $39.69 |
|
ABX.TO
Barrick Mining Corp.
|
$6.8B | $1.16 | 38.06% | 54.91% | $65.56 |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$4.8B | $3.62 | 36.02% | 140.89% | $269.67 |
|
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
|
$1.3B | $0.37 | 62.67% | 401.65% | $23.40 |
|
FNV.TO
Franco-Nevada Corp.
|
$796.8M | $2.34 | 67.64% | 72.09% | $343.05 |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$345.2M | $0.45 | 38.25% | 744.03% | $13.63 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$38.84 | $39.69 | $46.9B | 19.43x | $0.05 | 0.45% | 5.30x |
|
ABX.TO
Barrick Mining Corp.
|
$60.52 | $65.56 | $102.1B | 20.88x | $0.25 | 1.21% | 5.12x |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$234.07 | $269.67 | $117.5B | 24.49x | $0.56 | 0.96% | 7.98x |
|
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
|
$18.84 | $23.40 | $14.8B | 292.55x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.24x |
|
FNV.TO
Franco-Nevada Corp.
|
$286.10 | $343.05 | $55.2B | 42.97x | $0.53 | 0.75% | 25.55x |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$13.09 | $13.63 | $4B | 12.68x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.90x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
13.66% | 2.170 | 4.17% | 1.48x |
|
ABX.TO
Barrick Mining Corp.
|
15.79% | 2.265 | 7.34% | 1.84x |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
1.41% | 1.337 | 0.4% | 1.13x |
|
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
|
25.8% | 3.905 | 22.09% | 0.37x |
|
FNV.TO
Franco-Nevada Corp.
|
0.12% | 1.709 | 0.02% | 3.66x |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
11.65% | 0.600 | 7.62% | 2.35x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corp.
|
$1.2B | $1.1B | 21.05% | 24.97% | 42.8% | $922.9M |
|
ABX.TO
Barrick Mining Corp.
|
$3B | $2.9B | 13.4% | 15.3% | 49.86% | $2.1B |
|
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
|
$2.4B | $2.3B | 15.08% | 15.8% | 53.69% | $1.6B |
|
EQX.TO
Equinox Gold Corp.
|
$369.4M | $282.6M | 1.01% | 1.42% | 25.05% | -$40.9M |
|
FNV.TO
Franco-Nevada Corp.
|
$487.2M | $464.7M | 14.41% | 14.43% | 69.15% | $90.3M |
|
FVI.TO
Fortuna Mining Corp.
|
$180.4M | $145M | 14.87% | 16.82% | 42.05% | $86.6M |
Kinross Gold Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or ABX.TO?
Barrick Mining Corp. has a net margin of 33.8% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 45.79%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Barrick Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 15.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B ABX.TOBarrick Mining Corp.51.71% $1.05 $53.7B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or ABX.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $39.69, signalling upside risk potential of 2.2%. On the other hand Barrick Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $65.56 which suggests that it could grow by 8.14%. Given that Barrick Mining Corp. has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold Corp., analysts believe Barrick Mining Corp. is more attractive than Kinross Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 ABX.TOBarrick Mining Corp.12 2 1 -
Is K.TO or ABX.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.257% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Barrick Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.840, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.972%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or ABX.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Barrick Mining Corp. offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Barrick Mining Corp. pays out 33.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or ABX.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Barrick Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M is lower than Barrick Mining Corp.'s net income of $2.6B. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.43x while Barrick Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 20.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.30x versus 5.12x for Barrick Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.30x 19.43x $2.5B $838.9M ABX.TOBarrick Mining Corp.5.12x 20.88x $5.7B $2.6B
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or AEM.TO?
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a net margin of 33.8% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 34.48%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.56.57% $2.89 $33.2B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or AEM.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $39.69, signalling upside risk potential of 2.2%. On the other hand Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $269.67 which suggests that it could grow by 15.25%. Given that Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold Corp., analysts believe Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Kinross Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.11 3 1 -
Is K.TO or AEM.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.257% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.446%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or AEM.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. pays out 42.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or AEM.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M is lower than Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.43x while Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.30x versus 7.98x for Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.30x 19.43x $2.5B $838.9M AEM.TOAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd.7.98x 24.49x $4.2B $1.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or EQX.TO?
Equinox Gold Corp. has a net margin of 33.8% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 10.45%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Equinox Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 1.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B EQX.TOEquinox Gold Corp.32.75% $0.15 $10.5B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or EQX.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $39.69, signalling upside risk potential of 2.2%. On the other hand Equinox Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $23.40 which suggests that it could grow by 24.24%. Given that Equinox Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold Corp., analysts believe Equinox Gold Corp. is more attractive than Kinross Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 EQX.TOEquinox Gold Corp.4 1 0 -
Is K.TO or EQX.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.257% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equinox Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.944, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.354%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or EQX.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Equinox Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinox Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or EQX.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Equinox Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M is higher than Equinox Gold Corp.'s net income of $117.9M. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.43x while Equinox Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 292.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.30x versus 3.24x for Equinox Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.30x 19.43x $2.5B $838.9M EQX.TOEquinox Gold Corp.3.24x 292.55x $1.1B $117.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or FNV.TO?
Franco-Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 33.8% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 58.93%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Franco-Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of 14.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B FNV.TOFranco-Nevada Corp.72.49% $2.05 $9.8B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or FNV.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $39.69, signalling upside risk potential of 2.2%. On the other hand Franco-Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $343.05 which suggests that it could grow by 19.91%. Given that Franco-Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold Corp., analysts believe Franco-Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Kinross Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 FNV.TOFranco-Nevada Corp.7 6 0 -
Is K.TO or FNV.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.257% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franco-Nevada Corp. has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.377%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or FNV.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Franco-Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Franco-Nevada Corp. pays out 50.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or FNV.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Franco-Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of $672M. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M is higher than Franco-Nevada Corp.'s net income of $396M. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.43x while Franco-Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is 42.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.30x versus 25.55x for Franco-Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.30x 19.43x $2.5B $838.9M FNV.TOFranco-Nevada Corp.25.55x 42.97x $672M $396M
-
Which has Higher Returns K.TO or FVI.TO?
Fortuna Mining Corp. has a net margin of 33.8% compared to Kinross Gold Corp.'s net margin of 51.21%. Kinross Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Fortuna Mining Corp.'s return on equity of 16.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital K.TOKinross Gold Corp.47.43% $0.66 $13B FVI.TOFortuna Mining Corp.52.32% $0.51 $2.6B -
What do Analysts Say About K.TO or FVI.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $39.69, signalling upside risk potential of 2.2%. On the other hand Fortuna Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.63 which suggests that it could grow by 4.05%. Given that Fortuna Mining Corp. has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold Corp., analysts believe Fortuna Mining Corp. is more attractive than Kinross Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings K.TOKinross Gold Corp.9 4 1 FVI.TOFortuna Mining Corp.1 0 1 -
Is K.TO or FVI.TO More Risky?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.257% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fortuna Mining Corp. has a beta of 1.558, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.783%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock K.TO or FVI.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Fortuna Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold Corp. pays 15.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortuna Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios K.TO or FVI.TO?
Kinross Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Fortuna Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $344.8M. Kinross Gold Corp.'s net income of $838.9M is higher than Fortuna Mining Corp.'s net income of $176.6M. Notably, Kinross Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.43x while Fortuna Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold Corp. is 5.30x versus 2.90x for Fortuna Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income K.TOKinross Gold Corp.5.30x 19.43x $2.5B $838.9M FVI.TOFortuna Mining Corp.2.90x 12.68x $344.8M $176.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
55
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
45
CTEV alert for Jan 4
Claritev Corp. [CTEV] is down 20.7% over the past day.
Buy
60
BIDU alert for Jan 3
Baidu, Inc. [BIDU] is up 15.01% over the past day.
Sell
47
ASTS alert for Jan 4
AST Spacemobile, Inc. [ASTS] is up 14.94% over the past day.
