FVI.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a net margin of 18.37% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 25.53%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 1.85% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International's return on equity of -167.71%.

Fortuna Mining has a consensus price target of $8.12, signalling upside risk potential of 25.72%. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortuna Mining has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, analysts believe Fortuna Mining is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International.

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 1.603, which suggesting that the stock is 60.345% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fortuna Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortuna Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortuna Mining quarterly revenues are $375.1M, which are larger than Bee Vectoring Technologies International quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Fortuna Mining's net income of $68.9M is higher than Bee Vectoring Technologies International's net income of $20.9K. Notably, Fortuna Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.62x while Bee Vectoring Technologies International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortuna Mining is 1.44x versus 2.74x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Replenish Nutrients Holding has a net margin of 18.37% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 83.06%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 1.85% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding's return on equity of -1.35%.

Fortuna Mining has a consensus price target of $8.12, signalling upside risk potential of 25.72%. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1025%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding has higher upside potential than Fortuna Mining, analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding is more attractive than Fortuna Mining.

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 1.603, which suggesting that the stock is 60.345% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding has a beta of 1.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.857%.

Fortuna Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortuna Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortuna Mining quarterly revenues are $375.1M, which are larger than Replenish Nutrients Holding quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Fortuna Mining's net income of $68.9M is higher than Replenish Nutrients Holding's net income of $1.8M. Notably, Fortuna Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.62x while Replenish Nutrients Holding's PE ratio is 67.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortuna Mining is 1.44x versus 0.72x for Replenish Nutrients Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Organic Potash has a net margin of 18.37% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of --. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 1.85% beat Organic Potash's return on equity of --.

Fortuna Mining has a consensus price target of $8.12, signalling upside risk potential of 25.72%. On the other hand Organic Potash has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortuna Mining has higher upside potential than Organic Potash, analysts believe Fortuna Mining is more attractive than Organic Potash.

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 1.603, which suggesting that the stock is 60.345% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organic Potash has a beta of 0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.116%.

Fortuna Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Organic Potash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortuna Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Organic Potash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortuna Mining quarterly revenues are $375.1M, which are larger than Organic Potash quarterly revenues of --. Fortuna Mining's net income of $68.9M is higher than Organic Potash's net income of -$23.7K. Notably, Fortuna Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.62x while Organic Potash's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortuna Mining is 1.44x versus -- for Organic Potash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taseko Mines has a net margin of 18.37% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of -0.12%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 1.85% beat Taseko Mines's return on equity of 10.34%.

Fortuna Mining has a consensus price target of $8.12, signalling upside risk potential of 25.72%. On the other hand Taseko Mines has an analysts' consensus of $4.41 which suggests that it could grow by 47.89%. Given that Taseko Mines has higher upside potential than Fortuna Mining, analysts believe Taseko Mines is more attractive than Fortuna Mining.

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 1.603, which suggesting that the stock is 60.345% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taseko Mines has a beta of 1.877, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.709%.

Fortuna Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Taseko Mines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortuna Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Taseko Mines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortuna Mining quarterly revenues are $375.1M, which are larger than Taseko Mines quarterly revenues of $155.6M. Fortuna Mining's net income of $68.9M is higher than Taseko Mines's net income of -$180K. Notably, Fortuna Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 67.62x while Taseko Mines's PE ratio is 19.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortuna Mining is 1.44x versus 1.47x for Taseko Mines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.