Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
62
GCNS.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$48.84
Seasonality move
:
-0.74%
Day range:
$48.83 - $48.83
52-week range:
$42.72 - $49.22
Dividend yield:
2%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1
Avg. volume:
905
1-year change:
8.2%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GCNS.TO
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNV.TO
Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSCB.NO
CIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PACF.TO
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GCNS.TO
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$48.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.24 | 2% | -- |
|
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
|
$23.98 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 1.82% | -- |
|
CNV.TO
Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
|
$21.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 4.58% | -- |
|
CSCB.NO
CIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PACF.TO
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF
|
$24.81 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 4.23% | -- |
|
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$21.36 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 2.74% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GCNS.TO
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.399 | -- | -- |
|
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.403 | -- | -- |
|
CNV.TO
Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
|
-- | 0.319 | -- | -- |
|
CSCB.NO
CIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PACF.TO
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF
|
-- | 0.339 | -- | -- |
|
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.287 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GCNS.TO
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNV.TO
Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSCB.NO
CIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PACF.TO
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GCNS.TO or CBIN.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GCNS.TO or CBIN.TO?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is GCNS.TO or CBIN.TO More Risky?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.597% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCNS.TO or CBIN.TO?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCNS.TO or CBIN.TO?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GCNS.TO or CNV.TO?
Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a net margin of -- compared to iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- CNV.TOFranklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GCNS.TO or CNV.TO?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs, analysts believe iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 CNV.TOFranklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs0 0 0 -
Is GCNS.TO or CNV.TO More Risky?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.597% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCNS.TO or CNV.TO?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs offers a yield of 4.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCNS.TO or CNV.TO?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs quarterly revenues of --. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's net income of --. Notably, iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- CNV.TOFranklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GCNS.TO or CSCB.NO?
CIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat CIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- CSCB.NOCIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GCNS.TO or CSCB.NO?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than CIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF, analysts believe iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than CIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 CSCB.NOCIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF0 0 0 -
Is GCNS.TO or CSCB.NO More Risky?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.597% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCNS.TO or CSCB.NO?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. CIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCNS.TO or CSCB.NO?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than CIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for CIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- CSCB.NOCIBC Sustainable Cnsrv Bal Solu ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GCNS.TO or PACF.TO?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GCNS.TO or PACF.TO?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF, analysts believe iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF0 0 0 -
Is GCNS.TO or PACF.TO More Risky?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.597% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCNS.TO or PACF.TO?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF offers a yield of 4.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCNS.TO or PACF.TO?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GCNS.TO or XINC.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GCNS.TO or XINC.TO?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio, analysts believe iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is GCNS.TO or XINC.TO More Risky?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.597% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.379, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.133%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCNS.TO or XINC.TO?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2%. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCNS.TO or XINC.TO?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
87
HUT alert for Dec 25
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.65% over the past day.
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
60
GPCR alert for Dec 25
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.36% over the past day.
