Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Sell
32
XINC.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$21.26
Seasonality move
:
2.7%
Day range:
$21.26 - $21.30
52-week range:
$18.18 - $21.58
Dividend yield:
2.75%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.5K
Avg. volume:
3.9K
1-year change:
2.36%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNV.TO
Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCON.TO
Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TCON.TO
TD Conservative ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZCON.TO
BMO Conservative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$21.26 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 2.75% | -- |
|
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
|
$23.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 1.99% | -- |
|
CNV.TO
Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
|
$21.78 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 4.61% | -- |
|
MCON.TO
Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF
|
$23.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 2.73% | -- |
|
TCON.TO
TD Conservative ETF Portfolio
|
$16.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 2.92% | -- |
|
ZCON.TO
BMO Conservative ETF
|
$12.62 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 2.34% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.287 | -- | -- |
|
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.403 | -- | -- |
|
CNV.TO
Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
|
-- | 0.319 | -- | -- |
|
MCON.TO
Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.404 | -- | -- |
|
TCON.TO
TD Conservative ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.380 | -- | -- |
|
ZCON.TO
BMO Conservative ETF
|
-- | 0.416 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNV.TO
Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCON.TO
Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TCON.TO
TD Conservative ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZCON.TO
BMO Conservative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns XINC.TO or CBIN.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XINC.TO or CBIN.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is XINC.TO or CBIN.TO More Risky?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.379, which suggesting that the stock is 62.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XINC.TO or CBIN.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XINC.TO or CBIN.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XINC.TO or CNV.TO?
Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- CNV.TOFranklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XINC.TO or CNV.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs, analysts believe iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 CNV.TOFranklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs0 0 0 -
Is XINC.TO or CNV.TO More Risky?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.379, which suggesting that the stock is 62.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XINC.TO or CNV.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs offers a yield of 4.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XINC.TO or CNV.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- CNV.TOFranklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XINC.TO or MCON.TO?
Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- MCON.TOMackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XINC.TO or MCON.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 MCON.TOMackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is XINC.TO or MCON.TO More Risky?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.379, which suggesting that the stock is 62.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.478, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.232%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XINC.TO or MCON.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XINC.TO or MCON.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- MCON.TOMackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XINC.TO or TCON.TO?
TD Conservative ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat TD Conservative ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- TCON.TOTD Conservative ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XINC.TO or TCON.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TD Conservative ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than TD Conservative ETF Portfolio, analysts believe iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than TD Conservative ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 TCON.TOTD Conservative ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is XINC.TO or TCON.TO More Risky?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.379, which suggesting that the stock is 62.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TD Conservative ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.460, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XINC.TO or TCON.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. TD Conservative ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TD Conservative ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XINC.TO or TCON.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TD Conservative ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than TD Conservative ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TD Conservative ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for TD Conservative ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- TCON.TOTD Conservative ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XINC.TO or ZCON.TO?
BMO Conservative ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat BMO Conservative ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- ZCON.TOBMO Conservative ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XINC.TO or ZCON.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Conservative ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than BMO Conservative ETF, analysts believe iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than BMO Conservative ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 ZCON.TOBMO Conservative ETF0 0 0 -
Is XINC.TO or ZCON.TO More Risky?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.379, which suggesting that the stock is 62.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Conservative ETF has a beta of 0.490, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.989%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XINC.TO or ZCON.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. BMO Conservative ETF offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Conservative ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XINC.TO or ZCON.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Conservative ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than BMO Conservative ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Conservative ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for BMO Conservative ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- ZCON.TOBMO Conservative ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
