Financhill
Buy
54

CNV.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$21.80
Seasonality move :
0%
Day range:
$21.80 - $21.80
52-week range:
$20.12 - $22.05
Dividend yield:
4.61%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
100
Avg. volume:
139
1-year change:
1.16%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CNV.TO
Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
-- -- -- -- --
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
-- -- -- -- --
MCON.TO
Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF
-- -- -- -- --
TCON.TO
TD Conservative ETF Portfolio
-- -- -- -- --
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
-- -- -- -- --
ZCON.TO
BMO Conservative ETF
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CNV.TO
Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
$21.78 -- -- -- $0.16 4.61% --
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
$23.96 -- -- -- $0.07 1.99% --
MCON.TO
Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF
$23.94 -- -- -- $0.15 2.73% --
TCON.TO
TD Conservative ETF Portfolio
$16.61 -- -- -- $0.04 2.92% --
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
$21.26 -- -- -- $0.15 2.75% --
ZCON.TO
BMO Conservative ETF
$12.62 -- -- -- $0.08 2.34% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CNV.TO
Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
-- 0.319 -- --
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
-- 0.403 -- --
MCON.TO
Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF
-- 0.404 -- --
TCON.TO
TD Conservative ETF Portfolio
-- 0.380 -- --
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
-- 0.287 -- --
ZCON.TO
BMO Conservative ETF
-- 0.416 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CNV.TO
Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
-- -- -- -- -- --
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
MCON.TO
Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
TCON.TO
TD Conservative ETF Portfolio
-- -- -- -- -- --
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
-- -- -- -- -- --
ZCON.TO
BMO Conservative ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --

Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CNV.TO or CBIN.TO?

    CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's net margin of --. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's return on equity of -- beat CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CNV.TO
    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
    -- -- --
    CBIN.TO
    CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CNV.TO or CBIN.TO?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has higher upside potential than CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs is more attractive than CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CNV.TO
    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
    0 0 0
    CBIN.TO
    CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is CNV.TO or CBIN.TO More Risky?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNV.TO or CBIN.TO?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.61%. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CNV.TO or CBIN.TO?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's net income of -- is lower than CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs is -- versus -- for CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CNV.TO
    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
    -- -- -- --
    CBIN.TO
    CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CNV.TO or MCON.TO?

    Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's net margin of --. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CNV.TO
    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
    -- -- --
    MCON.TO
    Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CNV.TO or MCON.TO?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF, analysts believe Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs is more attractive than Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CNV.TO
    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
    0 0 0
    MCON.TO
    Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is CNV.TO or MCON.TO More Risky?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.478, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.232%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNV.TO or MCON.TO?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.61%. Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CNV.TO or MCON.TO?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CNV.TO
    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
    -- -- -- --
    MCON.TO
    Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CNV.TO or TCON.TO?

    TD Conservative ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's net margin of --. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's return on equity of -- beat TD Conservative ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CNV.TO
    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
    -- -- --
    TCON.TO
    TD Conservative ETF Portfolio
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CNV.TO or TCON.TO?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TD Conservative ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has higher upside potential than TD Conservative ETF Portfolio, analysts believe Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs is more attractive than TD Conservative ETF Portfolio.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CNV.TO
    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
    0 0 0
    TCON.TO
    TD Conservative ETF Portfolio
    0 0 0
  • Is CNV.TO or TCON.TO More Risky?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TD Conservative ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.460, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.001%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNV.TO or TCON.TO?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.61%. TD Conservative ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TD Conservative ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CNV.TO or TCON.TO?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TD Conservative ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's net income of -- is lower than TD Conservative ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TD Conservative ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs is -- versus -- for TD Conservative ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CNV.TO
    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
    -- -- -- --
    TCON.TO
    TD Conservative ETF Portfolio
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CNV.TO or XINC.TO?

    iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's net margin of --. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CNV.TO
    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
    -- -- --
    XINC.TO
    iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CNV.TO or XINC.TO?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has higher upside potential than iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio, analysts believe Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs is more attractive than iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CNV.TO
    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
    0 0 0
    XINC.TO
    iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
    0 0 0
  • Is CNV.TO or XINC.TO More Risky?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.379, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.133%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNV.TO or XINC.TO?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.61%. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CNV.TO or XINC.TO?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs is -- versus -- for iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CNV.TO
    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
    -- -- -- --
    XINC.TO
    iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CNV.TO or ZCON.TO?

    BMO Conservative ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's net margin of --. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's return on equity of -- beat BMO Conservative ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CNV.TO
    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
    -- -- --
    ZCON.TO
    BMO Conservative ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CNV.TO or ZCON.TO?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Conservative ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has higher upside potential than BMO Conservative ETF, analysts believe Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs is more attractive than BMO Conservative ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CNV.TO
    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
    0 0 0
    ZCON.TO
    BMO Conservative ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is CNV.TO or ZCON.TO More Risky?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Conservative ETF has a beta of 0.490, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.989%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNV.TO or ZCON.TO?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.61%. BMO Conservative ETF offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Conservative ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CNV.TO or ZCON.TO?

    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Conservative ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's net income of -- is lower than BMO Conservative ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Conservative ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs is -- versus -- for BMO Conservative ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CNV.TO
    Franklin Conservative Income ETF Portfolio ETF Srs
    -- -- -- --
    ZCON.TO
    BMO Conservative ETF
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?

Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.

Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6

Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.

Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6

Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock