Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Sell
47
CBIN.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$24.14
Seasonality move
:
2.85%
Day range:
$24.14 - $24.14
52-week range:
$21.46 - $24.22
Dividend yield:
1.99%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
2.1K
1-year change:
5.97%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCON.TO
Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VCNS.TO
Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZCON.TO
BMO Conservative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
|
$23.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 1.99% | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
$27.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 1.8% | -- |
|
MCON.TO
Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF
|
$23.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 2.73% | -- |
|
VCNS.TO
Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio
|
$31.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 2.42% | -- |
|
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$21.26 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 2.75% | -- |
|
ZCON.TO
BMO Conservative ETF
|
$12.62 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 2.34% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.403 | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | 0.625 | -- | -- |
|
MCON.TO
Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.404 | -- | -- |
|
VCNS.TO
Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.445 | -- | -- |
|
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.287 | -- | -- |
|
ZCON.TO
BMO Conservative ETF
|
-- | 0.416 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBGR.TO
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCON.TO
Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VCNS.TO
Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZCON.TO
BMO Conservative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CBIN.TO or CBGR.TO?
CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBIN.TO or CBGR.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF, analysts believe CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF0 0 0 -
Is CBIN.TO or CBGR.TO More Risky?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBIN.TO or CBGR.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBIN.TO or CBGR.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for CI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- CBGR.TOCI Balanced Gro Asset Alloc ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBIN.TO or MCON.TO?
Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- MCON.TOMackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBIN.TO or MCON.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF, analysts believe CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 MCON.TOMackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is CBIN.TO or MCON.TO More Risky?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.478, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.232%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBIN.TO or MCON.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBIN.TO or MCON.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- MCON.TOMackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBIN.TO or VCNS.TO?
Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- VCNS.TOVanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBIN.TO or VCNS.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio, analysts believe CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 VCNS.TOVanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is CBIN.TO or VCNS.TO More Risky?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.495, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.533%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBIN.TO or VCNS.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBIN.TO or VCNS.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- VCNS.TOVanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBIN.TO or XINC.TO?
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBIN.TO or XINC.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio, analysts believe CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is CBIN.TO or XINC.TO More Risky?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.379, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.133%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBIN.TO or XINC.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBIN.TO or XINC.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- XINC.TOiShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBIN.TO or ZCON.TO?
BMO Conservative ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's net margin of --. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Conservative ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- ZCON.TOBMO Conservative ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBIN.TO or ZCON.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Conservative ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Conservative ETF, analysts believe CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF is more attractive than BMO Conservative ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 ZCON.TOBMO Conservative ETF0 0 0 -
Is CBIN.TO or ZCON.TO More Risky?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Conservative ETF has a beta of 0.490, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.989%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBIN.TO or ZCON.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. BMO Conservative ETF offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Conservative ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBIN.TO or ZCON.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Conservative ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Conservative ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Conservative ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Conservative ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- ZCON.TOBMO Conservative ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
