Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
53
PACF.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$24.77
Seasonality move
:
2.08%
Day range:
$24.80 - $24.80
52-week range:
$22.02 - $24.85
Dividend yield:
4.23%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
3.2K
Avg. volume:
4.3K
1-year change:
7.54%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PACF.TO
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ETP.TO
First Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FINC.TO
Forstrong Global Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GCNS.TO
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZCON.TO
BMO Conservative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PACF.TO
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF
|
$24.80 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 4.23% | -- |
|
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
|
$23.98 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 1.82% | -- |
|
ETP.TO
First Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF
|
$18.39 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 4.24% | -- |
|
FINC.TO
Forstrong Global Income ETF
|
$22.87 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 2.13% | -- |
|
GCNS.TO
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$48.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.24 | 2% | -- |
|
ZCON.TO
BMO Conservative ETF
|
$12.69 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 2.33% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PACF.TO
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF
|
-- | 0.339 | -- | -- |
|
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.403 | -- | -- |
|
ETP.TO
First Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF
|
-- | 0.283 | -- | -- |
|
FINC.TO
Forstrong Global Income ETF
|
-- | 0.303 | -- | -- |
|
GCNS.TO
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.399 | -- | -- |
|
ZCON.TO
BMO Conservative ETF
|
-- | 0.416 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PACF.TO
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBIN.TO
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ETP.TO
First Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FINC.TO
Forstrong Global Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GCNS.TO
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZCON.TO
BMO Conservative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PACF.TO or CBIN.TO?
CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF-- -- -- CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PACF.TO or CBIN.TO?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has higher upside potential than CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF, analysts believe Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF is more attractive than CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF0 0 0 CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is PACF.TO or CBIN.TO More Risky?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PACF.TO or CBIN.TO?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PACF.TO or CBIN.TO?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF is -- versus -- for CI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF-- -- -- -- CBIN.TOCI Balanced Income Asset Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PACF.TO or ETP.TO?
First Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF-- -- -- ETP.TOFirst Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PACF.TO or ETP.TO?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF, analysts believe Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF is more attractive than First Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF0 0 0 ETP.TOFirst Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF0 0 0 -
Is PACF.TO or ETP.TO More Risky?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.679%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PACF.TO or ETP.TO?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. First Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF offers a yield of 4.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PACF.TO or ETP.TO?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF-- -- -- -- ETP.TOFirst Trust Global Risk ManagedIndex ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PACF.TO or FINC.TO?
Forstrong Global Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat Forstrong Global Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF-- -- -- FINC.TOForstrong Global Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PACF.TO or FINC.TO?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Forstrong Global Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has higher upside potential than Forstrong Global Income ETF, analysts believe Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF is more attractive than Forstrong Global Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF0 0 0 FINC.TOForstrong Global Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is PACF.TO or FINC.TO More Risky?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forstrong Global Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PACF.TO or FINC.TO?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. Forstrong Global Income ETF offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forstrong Global Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PACF.TO or FINC.TO?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Forstrong Global Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than Forstrong Global Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forstrong Global Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF is -- versus -- for Forstrong Global Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF-- -- -- -- FINC.TOForstrong Global Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PACF.TO or GCNS.TO?
iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF-- -- -- GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PACF.TO or GCNS.TO?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has higher upside potential than iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio, analysts believe Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF is more attractive than iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF0 0 0 GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is PACF.TO or GCNS.TO More Risky?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.454, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.597%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PACF.TO or GCNS.TO?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PACF.TO or GCNS.TO?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF is -- versus -- for iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF-- -- -- -- GCNS.TOiShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PACF.TO or ZCON.TO?
BMO Conservative ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Conservative ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF-- -- -- ZCON.TOBMO Conservative ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PACF.TO or ZCON.TO?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Conservative ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Conservative ETF, analysts believe Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF is more attractive than BMO Conservative ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF0 0 0 ZCON.TOBMO Conservative ETF0 0 0 -
Is PACF.TO or ZCON.TO More Risky?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Conservative ETF has a beta of 0.490, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.989%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PACF.TO or ZCON.TO?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. BMO Conservative ETF offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Conservative ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PACF.TO or ZCON.TO?
Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Conservative ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Conservative ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Conservative ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Active Conservative Fund ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Conservative ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PACF.TOPurpose Active Conservative Fund ETF-- -- -- -- ZCON.TOBMO Conservative ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
85
HUT alert for Dec 25
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.65% over the past day.
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
63
GPCR alert for Dec 25
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.36% over the past day.
