MMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 14.14%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77% beat Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $211.67, signalling upside risk potential of 15.73%. On the other hand Brown & Brown, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $92.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.37%. Given that Brown & Brown, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., analysts believe Brown & Brown, Inc. is more attractive than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc..

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.396% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.769%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Brown & Brown, Inc. offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays out 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M is higher than Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M. Notably, Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.94x while Brown & Brown, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is 3.42x versus 4.29x for Brown & Brown, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net margin of -8.28%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77% beat Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.3%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $211.67, signalling upside risk potential of 15.73%. On the other hand Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $33.88 which suggests that it could grow by 36.26%. Given that Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., analysts believe Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is more attractive than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc..

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.396% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.603%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $365.4M. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M is higher than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of -$30.2M. Notably, Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.94x while Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is 3.42x versus 1.13x for Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 14.03%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77% beat Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $211.67, signalling upside risk potential of 15.73%. On the other hand Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $91.55 which suggests that it could grow by 22.85%. Given that Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., analysts believe Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is more attractive than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc..

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.396% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.688%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues of $90.4M. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M is higher than Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $12.7M. Notably, Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.94x while Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s PE ratio is 65.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is 3.42x versus 7.42x for Goosehead Insurance, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Truist Financial Corp. has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 18.44%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77% beat Truist Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 8.08%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $211.67, signalling upside risk potential of 15.73%. On the other hand Truist Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $55.01 which suggests that it could grow by 6.46%. Given that Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Truist Financial Corp., analysts believe Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Truist Financial Corp..

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.396% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Truist Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.894, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.623%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Truist Financial Corp. offers a yield of 4.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Truist Financial Corp. pays out 6966.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Truist Financial Corp.'s is not.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than Truist Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M is lower than Truist Financial Corp.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.94x while Truist Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is 3.42x versus 2.17x for Truist Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.