MMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 14.14%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77% beat Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $211.85, signalling upside risk potential of 15.49%. On the other hand Brown & Brown, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $93.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.39%. Given that Brown & Brown, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., analysts believe Brown & Brown, Inc. is more attractive than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc..

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.816, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.449%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Brown & Brown, Inc. offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays out 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M is higher than Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M. Notably, Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.05x while Brown & Brown, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is 3.44x versus 4.34x for Brown & Brown, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Truist Financial Corp. has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 18.44%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77% beat Truist Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 8.08%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $211.85, signalling upside risk potential of 15.49%. On the other hand Truist Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $50.55 which suggests that it could grow by 6.61%. Given that Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Truist Financial Corp., analysts believe Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Truist Financial Corp..

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Truist Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.933%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Truist Financial Corp. offers a yield of 4.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Truist Financial Corp. pays out 6966.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Truist Financial Corp.'s is not.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than Truist Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M is lower than Truist Financial Corp.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.05x while Truist Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is 3.44x versus 2.04x for Truist Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 15.14%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77% beat The Travelers Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 20.27%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $211.85, signalling upside risk potential of 15.49%. On the other hand The Travelers Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $296.10 which suggests that it could grow by 4.16%. Given that Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than The Travelers Cos., Inc., analysts believe Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is more attractive than The Travelers Cos., Inc..

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.534, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.571%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. The Travelers Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Cos., Inc. pays out 19.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than The Travelers Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.5B. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M is lower than The Travelers Cos., Inc.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.05x while The Travelers Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is 3.44x versus 1.35x for The Travelers Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Willis Towers Watson Plc has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 13.37%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77% beat Willis Towers Watson Plc's return on equity of 26.7%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $211.85, signalling upside risk potential of 15.49%. On the other hand Willis Towers Watson Plc has an analysts' consensus of $365.22 which suggests that it could grow by 15.38%. Given that Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Willis Towers Watson Plc, analysts believe Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Willis Towers Watson Plc.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Willis Towers Watson Plc has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.121%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Willis Towers Watson Plc offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Willis Towers Watson Plc pays out 402.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Willis Towers Watson Plc's is not.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than Willis Towers Watson Plc quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M is higher than Willis Towers Watson Plc's net income of $306M. Notably, Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.05x while Willis Towers Watson Plc's PE ratio is 15.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is 3.44x versus 3.23x for Willis Towers Watson Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.