MMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 32.5%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77% beat Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.23%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $211.33, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $767,689.50 which suggests that it could grow by 2.46%. Given that Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., analysts believe Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Berkshire Hathaway, Inc..

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.818%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. quarterly revenues of $95B. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M is lower than Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.'s net income of $30.9B. Notably, Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.30x while Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is 3.48x versus 2,177.42x for Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 14.14%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77% beat Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.39%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $211.33, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand Brown & Brown, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $92.71 which suggests that it could grow by 15.54%. Given that Brown & Brown, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., analysts believe Brown & Brown, Inc. is more attractive than Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc..

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.816, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.449%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Brown & Brown, Inc. offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays out 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M is higher than Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $227M. Notably, Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.30x while Brown & Brown, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is 3.48x versus 4.36x for Brown & Brown, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Charles Schwab Corp. has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 33.49%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77% beat The Charles Schwab Corp.'s return on equity of 16.88%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $211.33, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand The Charles Schwab Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $112.79 which suggests that it could grow by 11.47%. Given that Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than The Charles Schwab Corp., analysts believe Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is more attractive than The Charles Schwab Corp..

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Charles Schwab Corp. has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.051%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. The Charles Schwab Corp. offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. The Charles Schwab Corp. pays out 33.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than The Charles Schwab Corp. quarterly revenues of $7B. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M is lower than The Charles Schwab Corp.'s net income of $2.4B. Notably, Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.30x while The Charles Schwab Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is 3.48x versus 6.79x for The Charles Schwab Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Truist Financial Corp. has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 18.44%. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 28.77% beat Truist Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 8.08%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $211.33, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand Truist Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $51.08 which suggests that it could grow by 1.18%. Given that Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Truist Financial Corp., analysts believe Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Truist Financial Corp..

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Truist Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.933%.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Truist Financial Corp. offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. pays 38.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Truist Financial Corp. pays out 6966.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Truist Financial Corp.'s is not.

Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than Truist Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s net income of $757M is lower than Truist Financial Corp.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.30x while Truist Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. is 3.48x versus 2.17x for Truist Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.