L Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Loews's net margin of 24.7%. Loews's return on equity of 9.94% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 24.78%.

Loews has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -61.62%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $156.33 which suggests that it could grow by 9.4%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than Loews, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 16.974% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.78%.

Loews has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Loews pays 3.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loews quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Loews's net income of $401M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $820M. Notably, Loews's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.09x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 7.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loews is 1.09x versus 1.85x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNA Financial has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Loews's net margin of 7.97%. Loews's return on equity of 9.94% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 13.39%.

Loews has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -61.62%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.65%. Given that CNA Financial has higher upside potential than Loews, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 16.974% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.737%.

Loews has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Loews pays 3.98% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 65.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loews quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Loews's net income of $401M is higher than CNA Financial's net income of $283M. Notably, Loews's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.09x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 10.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loews is 1.09x versus 0.95x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Loews's net margin of 11.84%. Loews's return on equity of 9.94% beat Progressive's return on equity of 36.88%.

Loews has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -61.62%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $276.5625 which suggests that it could grow by 14.75%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than Loews, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 16.974% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.988%.

Loews has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Progressive offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Loews pays 3.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loews quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $19.7B. Loews's net income of $401M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.3B. Notably, Loews's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.09x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loews is 1.09x versus 1.97x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 9.12% compared to Loews's net margin of 8.89%. Loews's return on equity of 9.94% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 9.26%.

Loews has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -61.62%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -13.87%. Given that Loews has more downside risk than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Safety Insurance Group is more attractive than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 16.974% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.191, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.899%.

Loews has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Loews pays 3.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 282.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Safety Insurance Group's is not.

Loews quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $291.1M. Loews's net income of $401M is higher than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $25.9M. Notably, Loews's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.09x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loews is 1.09x versus 1.11x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.