MCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HCI Group, Inc. has a net margin of 13.19% compared to Mercury General Corp.'s net margin of 31.38%. Mercury General Corp.'s return on equity of 26.05% beat HCI Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 34.65%.

Mercury General Corp. has a consensus price target of $100.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.69%. On the other hand HCI Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $245.00 which suggests that it could grow by 56.93%. Given that HCI Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mercury General Corp., analysts believe HCI Group, Inc. is more attractive than Mercury General Corp..

Mercury General Corp. has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCI Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.382%.

Mercury General Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. HCI Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Mercury General Corp. pays 13% of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group, Inc. pays out 18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than HCI Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $216.4M. Mercury General Corp.'s net income of $202.5M is higher than HCI Group, Inc.'s net income of $67.9M. Notably, Mercury General Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.85x while HCI Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General Corp. is 0.80x versus 2.35x for HCI Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 13.19% compared to Mercury General Corp.'s net margin of 23.73%. Mercury General Corp.'s return on equity of 26.05% beat Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 43.38%.

Mercury General Corp. has a consensus price target of $100.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.69%. On the other hand Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $35.50 which suggests that it could grow by 47.3%. Given that Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mercury General Corp., analysts believe Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Mercury General Corp..

Mercury General Corp. has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.001%.

Mercury General Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mercury General Corp. pays 13% of its earnings as a dividend. Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $212.5M. Mercury General Corp.'s net income of $202.5M is higher than Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $50.4M. Notably, Mercury General Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.85x while Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General Corp. is 0.80x versus 0.88x for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loews Corp. has a net margin of 13.19% compared to Mercury General Corp.'s net margin of 9.04%. Mercury General Corp.'s return on equity of 26.05% beat Loews Corp.'s return on equity of 9.5%.

Mercury General Corp. has a consensus price target of $100.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.69%. On the other hand Loews Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -70.85%. Given that Mercury General Corp. has higher upside potential than Loews Corp., analysts believe Mercury General Corp. is more attractive than Loews Corp..

Mercury General Corp. has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loews Corp. has a beta of 0.610, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.017%.

Mercury General Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Loews Corp. offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Mercury General Corp. pays 13% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews Corp. pays out 3.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Loews Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Mercury General Corp.'s net income of $202.5M is lower than Loews Corp.'s net income of $428M. Notably, Mercury General Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.85x while Loews Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General Corp. is 0.80x versus 1.24x for Loews Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 13.19% compared to Mercury General Corp.'s net margin of 20.08%. Mercury General Corp.'s return on equity of 26.05% beat The Travelers Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 20.95%.

Mercury General Corp. has a consensus price target of $100.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.69%. On the other hand The Travelers Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $302.05 which suggests that it could fall by -0.95%. Given that Mercury General Corp. has higher upside potential than The Travelers Cos., Inc., analysts believe Mercury General Corp. is more attractive than The Travelers Cos., Inc..

Mercury General Corp. has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.515, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.506%.

Mercury General Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. The Travelers Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Mercury General Corp. pays 13% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Cos., Inc. pays out 15.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than The Travelers Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.4B. Mercury General Corp.'s net income of $202.5M is lower than The Travelers Cos., Inc.'s net income of $2.5B. Notably, Mercury General Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.85x while The Travelers Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General Corp. is 0.80x versus 1.42x for The Travelers Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.