MCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial Corp. has a net margin of 17.69% compared to Mercury General Corp.'s net margin of 30.11%. Mercury General Corp.'s return on equity of 22.36% beat Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 14.91%.

Mercury General Corp. has a consensus price target of $100.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.17%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $173.67 which suggests that it could grow by 7.94%. Given that Mercury General Corp. has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial Corp., analysts believe Mercury General Corp. is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial Corp..

Mercury General Corp. has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.303% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.665, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.523%.

Mercury General Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. Cincinnati Financial Corp. offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. Mercury General Corp. pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial Corp. pays out 22.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Cincinnati Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Mercury General Corp.'s net income of $280.4M is lower than Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Mercury General Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.04x while Cincinnati Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General Corp. is 0.83x versus 2.10x for Cincinnati Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNA Financial Corp. has a net margin of 17.69% compared to Mercury General Corp.'s net margin of 10.56%. Mercury General Corp.'s return on equity of 22.36% beat CNA Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 9.31%.

Mercury General Corp. has a consensus price target of $100.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.17%. On the other hand CNA Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $44.00 which suggests that it could fall by -8.07%. Given that Mercury General Corp. has higher upside potential than CNA Financial Corp., analysts believe Mercury General Corp. is more attractive than CNA Financial Corp..

Mercury General Corp. has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.303% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.375, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.523%.

Mercury General Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. CNA Financial Corp. offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Mercury General Corp. pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial Corp. pays out 50.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than CNA Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Mercury General Corp.'s net income of $280.4M is lower than CNA Financial Corp.'s net income of $403M. Notably, Mercury General Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.04x while CNA Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General Corp. is 0.83x versus 0.88x for CNA Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 17.69% compared to Mercury General Corp.'s net margin of 23.73%. Mercury General Corp.'s return on equity of 22.36% beat Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 43.38%.

Mercury General Corp. has a consensus price target of $100.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.17%. On the other hand Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $35.50 which suggests that it could grow by 36.17%. Given that Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mercury General Corp., analysts believe Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Mercury General Corp..

Mercury General Corp. has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.303% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.983, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.716%.

Mercury General Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mercury General Corp. pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $212.5M. Mercury General Corp.'s net income of $280.4M is higher than Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $50.4M. Notably, Mercury General Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.04x while Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General Corp. is 0.83x versus 0.96x for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 17.69% compared to Mercury General Corp.'s net margin of 20.08%. Mercury General Corp.'s return on equity of 22.36% beat The Travelers Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 20.95%.

Mercury General Corp. has a consensus price target of $100.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.17%. On the other hand The Travelers Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $300.45 which suggests that it could grow by 5.6%. Given that Mercury General Corp. has higher upside potential than The Travelers Cos., Inc., analysts believe Mercury General Corp. is more attractive than The Travelers Cos., Inc..

Mercury General Corp. has a beta of 0.937, which suggesting that the stock is 6.303% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.522, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.78%.

Mercury General Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. The Travelers Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Mercury General Corp. pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Cos., Inc. pays out 15.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than The Travelers Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.4B. Mercury General Corp.'s net income of $280.4M is lower than The Travelers Cos., Inc.'s net income of $2.5B. Notably, Mercury General Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.04x while The Travelers Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General Corp. is 0.83x versus 1.33x for The Travelers Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.