FLR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AECOM has a net margin of -37.38% compared to Fluor Corp.'s net margin of 4.16%. Fluor Corp.'s return on equity of -1.4% beat AECOM's return on equity of 26.84%.

Fluor Corp. has a consensus price target of $54.22, signalling upside risk potential of 0.99%. On the other hand AECOM has an analysts' consensus of $128.25 which suggests that it could grow by 31.01%. Given that AECOM has higher upside potential than Fluor Corp., analysts believe AECOM is more attractive than Fluor Corp..

Fluor Corp. has a beta of 1.373, which suggesting that the stock is 37.305% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AECOM has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.376%.

Fluor Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AECOM offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Fluor Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AECOM pays out 24.68% of its earnings as a dividend. AECOM's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fluor Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than AECOM quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Fluor Corp.'s net income of -$1.6B is lower than AECOM's net income of $159.3M. Notably, Fluor Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.31x while AECOM's PE ratio is 22.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor Corp. is 0.56x versus 0.82x for AECOM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has a net margin of -37.38% compared to Fluor Corp.'s net margin of 9.08%. Fluor Corp.'s return on equity of -1.4% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s return on equity of 17.23%.

Fluor Corp. has a consensus price target of $54.22, signalling upside risk potential of 0.99%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $17.80 which suggests that it could grow by 5.39%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has higher upside potential than Fluor Corp., analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. is more attractive than Fluor Corp..

Fluor Corp. has a beta of 1.373, which suggesting that the stock is 37.305% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has a beta of 1.416, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.629%.

Fluor Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluor Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. quarterly revenues of $195.2M. Fluor Corp.'s net income of -$1.6B is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s net income of $17.7M. Notably, Fluor Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.31x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor Corp. is 0.56x versus 1.37x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanta Services, Inc. has a net margin of -37.38% compared to Fluor Corp.'s net margin of 4.04%. Fluor Corp.'s return on equity of -1.4% beat Quanta Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.99%.

Fluor Corp. has a consensus price target of $54.22, signalling upside risk potential of 0.99%. On the other hand Quanta Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $557.69 which suggests that it could grow by 0.04%. Given that Fluor Corp. has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, Inc., analysts believe Fluor Corp. is more attractive than Quanta Services, Inc..

Fluor Corp. has a beta of 1.373, which suggesting that the stock is 37.305% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanta Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.088%.

Fluor Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanta Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Fluor Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc. pays out 6.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fluor Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than Quanta Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Fluor Corp.'s net income of -$1.6B is lower than Quanta Services, Inc.'s net income of $316.6M. Notably, Fluor Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.31x while Quanta Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 81.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor Corp. is 0.56x versus 2.94x for Quanta Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a net margin of -37.38% compared to Fluor Corp.'s net margin of 13.98%. Fluor Corp.'s return on equity of -1.4% beat Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.26%.

Fluor Corp. has a consensus price target of $54.22, signalling upside risk potential of 0.99%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $451.80 which suggests that it could grow by 3.74%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fluor Corp., analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Fluor Corp..

Fluor Corp. has a beta of 1.373, which suggesting that the stock is 37.305% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.251%.

Fluor Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluor Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues of $689M. Fluor Corp.'s net income of -$1.6B is lower than Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M. Notably, Fluor Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.31x while Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s PE ratio is 42.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor Corp. is 0.56x versus 6.03x for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.