STRL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fluor has a net margin of 10.33% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of 1.32%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 28.17% beat Fluor's return on equity of 12.15%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.34%. On the other hand Fluor has an analysts' consensus of $57.75 which suggests that it could grow by 14.72%. Given that Fluor has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Fluor is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.169% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor has a beta of 1.890, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.961%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor pays out 20.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $593.7M, which are smaller than Fluor quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $61.3M is higher than Fluor's net income of $54M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.59x while Fluor's PE ratio is 34.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 2.60x versus 0.55x for Fluor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 10.33% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of 4.63%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 28.17% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 14.75%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.34%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 25.14%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.169% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.343%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $593.7M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $191.2M. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $61.3M is higher than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $8.9M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.59x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 13.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 2.60x versus 1.07x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of 10.33% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of 1.88%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 28.17% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of -10.35%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.34%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 47.57%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.169% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.894, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.577%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $593.7M, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $226.7M. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $61.3M is higher than Orion Group Holdings's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.59x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 2.60x versus 0.33x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliant Holdings has a net margin of 10.33% compared to Sterling Infrastructure's net margin of -11.74%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 28.17% beat Reliant Holdings's return on equity of 44.89%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.34%. On the other hand Reliant Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Reliant Holdings, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than Reliant Holdings.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.169% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliant Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sterling Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reliant Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reliant Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $593.7M, which are larger than Reliant Holdings quarterly revenues of $951.2K. Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $61.3M is higher than Reliant Holdings's net income of -$111.7K. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.59x while Reliant Holdings's PE ratio is 21.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure is 2.60x versus 0.48x for Reliant Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.