STRL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fluor Corp. has a net margin of 13.98% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of -20.99%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.26% beat Fluor Corp.'s return on equity of 79.39%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $443.25, signalling upside risk potential of 26.14%. On the other hand Fluor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $50.50 which suggests that it could grow by 10.79%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fluor Corp., analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Fluor Corp..

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.495, which suggesting that the stock is 49.535% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor Corp. has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.24%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $689M, which are smaller than Fluor Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M is higher than Fluor Corp.'s net income of -$707M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.46x while Fluor Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is 4.87x versus 0.49x for Fluor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has a net margin of 13.98% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of 9.08%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.26% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s return on equity of 17.23%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $443.25, signalling upside risk potential of 26.14%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.32%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp., analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp..

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.495, which suggesting that the stock is 49.535% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has a beta of 1.402, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.203%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $689M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. quarterly revenues of $195.2M. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M is higher than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s net income of $17.7M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.46x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is 4.87x versus 1.25x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 13.98% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of 1.47%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.26% beat Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.28%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $443.25, signalling upside risk potential of 26.14%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.13 which suggests that it could grow by 7.49%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Orion Group Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Orion Group Holdings, Inc..

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.495, which suggesting that the stock is 49.535% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.965%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Group Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $689M, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $225.1M. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M is higher than Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.3M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.46x while Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 50.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is 4.87x versus 0.58x for Orion Group Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanta Services, Inc. has a net margin of 13.98% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of 4.49%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.26% beat Quanta Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.57%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $443.25, signalling upside risk potential of 26.14%. On the other hand Quanta Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $476.97 which suggests that it could grow by 1.75%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, Inc., analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Quanta Services, Inc..

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.495, which suggesting that the stock is 49.535% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanta Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.155, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.543%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanta Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc. pays out 6.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $689M, which are smaller than Quanta Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M is lower than Quanta Services, Inc.'s net income of $342.8M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.46x while Quanta Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 69.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is 4.87x versus 2.60x for Quanta Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.