STRL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fluor Corp. has a net margin of 13.98% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of -20.99%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.26% beat Fluor Corp.'s return on equity of 79.39%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $453.33, signalling upside risk potential of 40.15%. On the other hand Fluor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $50.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.26%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fluor Corp., analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Fluor Corp..

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.494, which suggesting that the stock is 49.411% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor Corp. has a beta of 1.313, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.295%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $689M, which are smaller than Fluor Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M is higher than Fluor Corp.'s net income of -$707M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.72x while Fluor Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is 4.48x versus 0.48x for Fluor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has a net margin of 13.98% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of 9.08%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.26% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s return on equity of 17.23%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $453.33, signalling upside risk potential of 40.15%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.61%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp., analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp..

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.494, which suggesting that the stock is 49.411% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has a beta of 1.434, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.39%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $689M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. quarterly revenues of $195.2M. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M is higher than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s net income of $17.7M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.72x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is 4.48x versus 1.06x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasTec, Inc. has a net margin of 13.98% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of 4.2%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.26% beat MasTec, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.82%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $453.33, signalling upside risk potential of 40.15%. On the other hand MasTec, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $246.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than MasTec, Inc., analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than MasTec, Inc..

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.494, which suggesting that the stock is 49.411% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasTec, Inc. has a beta of 1.938, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.842%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MasTec, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MasTec, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $689M, which are smaller than MasTec, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4B. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M is lower than MasTec, Inc.'s net income of $166.5M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.72x while MasTec, Inc.'s PE ratio is 51.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is 4.48x versus 1.25x for MasTec, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanta Services, Inc. has a net margin of 13.98% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of 4.49%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.26% beat Quanta Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.57%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $453.33, signalling upside risk potential of 40.15%. On the other hand Quanta Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $474.38 which suggests that it could grow by 4.03%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, Inc., analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Quanta Services, Inc..

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.494, which suggesting that the stock is 49.411% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanta Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.106%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanta Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc. pays out 6.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $689M, which are smaller than Quanta Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M is lower than Quanta Services, Inc.'s net income of $342.8M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.72x while Quanta Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 67.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is 4.48x versus 2.53x for Quanta Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.