STRL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EMCOR Group, Inc. has a net margin of 13.98% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of 6.87%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.26% beat EMCOR Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 37.58%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $443.25, signalling upside risk potential of 1.25%. On the other hand EMCOR Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $772.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.6%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than EMCOR Group, Inc., analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than EMCOR Group, Inc..

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.513, which suggesting that the stock is 51.251% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMCOR Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.737%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EMCOR Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group, Inc. pays out 4.32% of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $689M, which are smaller than EMCOR Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M is lower than EMCOR Group, Inc.'s net income of $295.4M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.93x while EMCOR Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is 6.06x versus 2.24x for EMCOR Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fluor Corp. has a net margin of 13.98% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of -20.99%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.26% beat Fluor Corp.'s return on equity of 79.39%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $443.25, signalling upside risk potential of 1.25%. On the other hand Fluor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $50.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.04%. Given that Fluor Corp. has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, Inc., analysts believe Fluor Corp. is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure, Inc..

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.513, which suggesting that the stock is 51.251% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor Corp. has a beta of 1.373, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.305%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $689M, which are smaller than Fluor Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M is higher than Fluor Corp.'s net income of -$707M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.93x while Fluor Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is 6.06x versus 0.49x for Fluor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has a net margin of 13.98% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of 9.08%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.26% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s return on equity of 17.23%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $443.25, signalling upside risk potential of 1.25%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $17.80 which suggests that it could grow by 5.39%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, Inc., analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure, Inc..

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.513, which suggesting that the stock is 51.251% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has a beta of 1.416, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.629%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $689M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. quarterly revenues of $195.2M. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M is higher than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s net income of $17.7M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.93x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is 6.06x versus 1.37x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanta Services, Inc. has a net margin of 13.98% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of 4.49%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.26% beat Quanta Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.57%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $443.25, signalling upside risk potential of 1.25%. On the other hand Quanta Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $479.09 which suggests that it could fall by -8.59%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, Inc., analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Quanta Services, Inc..

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.513, which suggesting that the stock is 51.251% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanta Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.088%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanta Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc. pays out 6.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $689M, which are smaller than Quanta Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M is lower than Quanta Services, Inc.'s net income of $342.8M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 42.93x while Quanta Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 77.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is 6.06x versus 2.91x for Quanta Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.