STRL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a net margin of 12.14% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of 12.5%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.56% beat Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s return on equity of 50.45%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $494.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.99%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1,670.25 which suggests that it could grow by 19.69%. Given that Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, Inc., analysts believe Comfort Systems USA, Inc. is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure, Inc..

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.514, which suggesting that the stock is 51.38% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has a beta of 1.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.552%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comfort Systems USA, Inc. offers a yield of 0.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA, Inc. pays out 6.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $755.6M, which are smaller than Comfort Systems USA, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $91.7M is lower than Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s net income of $330.8M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.88x while Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s PE ratio is 48.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is 5.11x versus 5.47x for Comfort Systems USA, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fluor Corp. has a net margin of 12.14% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of -37.38%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.56% beat Fluor Corp.'s return on equity of -1.4%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $494.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.99%. On the other hand Fluor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $53.50 which suggests that it could grow by 15.02%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fluor Corp., analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Fluor Corp..

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.514, which suggesting that the stock is 51.38% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor Corp. has a beta of 1.303, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.295%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluor Corp. offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $755.6M, which are smaller than Fluor Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $91.7M is higher than Fluor Corp.'s net income of -$1.6B. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.88x while Fluor Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is 5.11x versus 0.49x for Fluor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasTec, Inc. has a net margin of 12.14% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of 3.89%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.56% beat MasTec, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.64%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $494.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.99%. On the other hand MasTec, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $341.28 which suggests that it could grow by 1.63%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than MasTec, Inc., analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than MasTec, Inc..

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.514, which suggesting that the stock is 51.38% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasTec, Inc. has a beta of 1.800, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.024%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MasTec, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MasTec, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $755.6M, which are smaller than MasTec, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $91.7M is lower than MasTec, Inc.'s net income of $153.1M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.88x while MasTec, Inc.'s PE ratio is 66.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is 5.11x versus 1.86x for MasTec, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanta Services, Inc. has a net margin of 12.14% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net margin of 4.04%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.56% beat Quanta Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.99%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a consensus price target of $494.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.99%. On the other hand Quanta Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $587.77 which suggests that it could grow by 4.62%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, Inc., analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Quanta Services, Inc..

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.514, which suggesting that the stock is 51.38% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanta Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.104, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.426%.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanta Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc. pays out 6.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues are $755.6M, which are smaller than Quanta Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $91.7M is lower than Quanta Services, Inc.'s net income of $316.6M. Notably, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.88x while Quanta Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 82.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is 5.11x versus 2.98x for Quanta Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.