ORN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dycom Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 1.47% compared to Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.33%. Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.28% beat Dycom Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.57%.

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.17, signalling upside risk potential of 21.42%. On the other hand Dycom Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $385.56 which suggests that it could grow by 9.29%. Given that Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dycom Industries, Inc., analysts believe Orion Group Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Dycom Industries, Inc..

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.178% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dycom Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.362, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.154%.

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dycom Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Orion Group Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dycom Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $225.1M, which are smaller than Dycom Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.3M is lower than Dycom Industries, Inc.'s net income of $106.4M. Notably, Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.53x while Dycom Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Orion Group Holdings, Inc. is 0.47x versus 2.00x for Dycom Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fluor Corp. has a net margin of 1.47% compared to Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -20.99%. Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.28% beat Fluor Corp.'s return on equity of 79.39%.

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.17, signalling upside risk potential of 21.42%. On the other hand Fluor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $50.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.26%. Given that Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fluor Corp., analysts believe Orion Group Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Fluor Corp..

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.178% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor Corp. has a beta of 1.313, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.295%.

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Orion Group Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $225.1M, which are smaller than Fluor Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.3M is higher than Fluor Corp.'s net income of -$707M. Notably, Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.53x while Fluor Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Orion Group Holdings, Inc. is 0.47x versus 0.48x for Fluor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has a net margin of 1.47% compared to Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 9.08%. Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.28% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s return on equity of 17.23%.

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.17, signalling upside risk potential of 21.42%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.61%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has higher upside potential than Orion Group Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. is more attractive than Orion Group Holdings, Inc..

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.178% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. has a beta of 1.434, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.39%.

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Orion Group Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $225.1M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp. quarterly revenues of $195.2M. Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.3M is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s net income of $17.7M. Notably, Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.53x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Orion Group Holdings, Inc. is 0.47x versus 1.06x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a net margin of 1.47% compared to Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 13.98%. Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.28% beat Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.26%.

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.17, signalling upside risk potential of 21.42%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $453.33 which suggests that it could grow by 40.15%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than Orion Group Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than Orion Group Holdings, Inc..

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.178% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.411%.

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Orion Group Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Orion Group Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $225.1M, which are smaller than Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues of $689M. Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.3M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M. Notably, Orion Group Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.53x while Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Orion Group Holdings, Inc. is 0.47x versus 4.48x for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.