Financhill
Sell
18

ACA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$77.17
Seasonality move :
2.75%
Day range:
$74.28 - $77.42
52-week range:
$68.11 - $113.43
Dividend yield:
0.26%
P/E ratio:
40.37x
P/S ratio:
1.47x
P/B ratio:
1.55x
Volume:
242.8K
Avg. volume:
394.6K
1-year change:
-6.12%
Market cap:
$3.8B
Revenue:
$2.6B
EPS (TTM):
$1.91

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ACA
Arcosa
$764.5M $1.13 3.12% -75.29% $111.83
FLR
Fluor
$4.6B $0.59 9.3% -39.01% $48.90
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
$173.1M $0.10 4.05% -15.32% $14.50
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
$200.3M -$0.03 10.48% -68.42% $10.50
SLND
Southland Holdings
$249.2M -$0.28 -20.64% -3575% $4.50
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
$536.7M $2.14 -7.92% 28.29% $198.33
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ACA
Arcosa
$77.11 $111.83 $3.8B 40.37x $0.05 0.26% 1.47x
FLR
Fluor
$33.28 $48.90 $5.6B 2.71x $0.00 0% 0.35x
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
$8.88 $14.50 $597.5M 10.57x $0.00 0% 0.79x
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
$5.75 $10.50 $224.2M -- $0.00 0% 0.25x
SLND
Southland Holdings
$3.20 $4.50 $172.8M -- $0.00 0% 0.16x
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
$137.09 $198.33 $4.2B 16.56x $0.00 0% 2.02x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ACA
Arcosa
41.02% 2.316 35.79% 1.04x
FLR
Fluor
21.85% 1.380 13.16% 1.63x
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
49.96% 2.743 59.01% 0.94x
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
13.33% 4.639 8.11% 1.35x
SLND
Southland Holdings
64.71% 1.956 160.47% 1.36x
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
28.13% 2.634 6.1% 1.35x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ACA
Arcosa
$128.9M $39.9M 2.79% 3.91% 6.88% $194.9M
FLR
Fluor
$208M $152M 58.5% 84.64% 5.47% $296M
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
$48.9M $27M 6.89% 13.72% 14.67% -$36.1M
ORN
Orion Group Holdings
$30.3M $8.7M -0.99% -1.28% 4.52% $9.9M
SLND
Southland Holdings
$7.7M -$8M -20.27% -49.21% -2.64% -$11.5M
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
$106.7M $62.5M 24.95% 36.63% 32.35% $158.6M

Arcosa vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or FLR?

    Fluor has a net margin of -1.16% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 43.73%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.91% beat Fluor's return on equity of 84.64%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    19.35% -$0.16 $4.1B
    FLR
    Fluor
    4.88% $10.67 $5.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or FLR?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 45.03%. On the other hand Fluor has an analysts' consensus of $48.90 which suggests that it could grow by 46.94%. Given that Fluor has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Fluor is more attractive than Arcosa.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    FLR
    Fluor
    6 3 0
  • Is ACA or FLR More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 14.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor has a beta of 1.656, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.56%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or FLR?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Fluor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or FLR?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $666.2M, which are smaller than Fluor quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Arcosa's net income of -$7.7M is lower than Fluor's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.37x while Fluor's PE ratio is 2.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.47x versus 0.35x for Fluor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.47x 40.37x $666.2M -$7.7M
    FLR
    Fluor
    0.35x 2.71x $4.3B $1.9B
  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or GLDD?

    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of -1.16% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 9.72%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.91% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 13.72%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    19.35% -$0.16 $4.1B
    GLDD
    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
    24.13% $0.29 $897.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or GLDD?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 45.03%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 63.29%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Arcosa.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    GLDD
    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
    2 0 0
  • Is ACA or GLDD More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 14.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.174, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.432%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or GLDD?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or GLDD?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $666.2M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $202.8M. Arcosa's net income of -$7.7M is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.37x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 10.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.47x versus 0.79x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.47x 40.37x $666.2M -$7.7M
    GLDD
    Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
    0.79x 10.57x $202.8M $19.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or ORN?

    Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of -1.16% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 3.11%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.91% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of -1.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    19.35% -$0.16 $4.1B
    ORN
    Orion Group Holdings
    13.96% $0.17 $173.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or ORN?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 45.03%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 82.61%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Arcosa.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    ORN
    Orion Group Holdings
    3 0 0
  • Is ACA or ORN More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 14.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.961%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or ORN?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or ORN?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $666.2M, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $216.9M. Arcosa's net income of -$7.7M is lower than Orion Group Holdings's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.37x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.47x versus 0.25x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.47x 40.37x $666.2M -$7.7M
    ORN
    Orion Group Holdings
    0.25x -- $216.9M $6.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or SLND?

    Southland Holdings has a net margin of -1.16% compared to Arcosa's net margin of -1.56%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.91% beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -49.21%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    19.35% -$0.16 $4.1B
    SLND
    Southland Holdings
    2.87% -$0.09 $475.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or SLND?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 45.03%. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 40.63%. Given that Arcosa has higher upside potential than Southland Holdings, analysts believe Arcosa is more attractive than Southland Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    SLND
    Southland Holdings
    2 1 0
  • Is ACA or SLND More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 14.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or SLND?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or SLND?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $666.2M, which are larger than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $267.3M. Arcosa's net income of -$7.7M is lower than Southland Holdings's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.37x while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.47x versus 0.16x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.47x 40.37x $666.2M -$7.7M
    SLND
    Southland Holdings
    0.16x -- $267.3M -$4.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACA or STRL?

    Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of -1.16% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 22.7%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.91% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 36.63%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACA
    Arcosa
    19.35% -$0.16 $4.1B
    STRL
    Sterling Infrastructure
    21.39% $3.64 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About ACA or STRL?

    Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 45.03%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of $198.33 which suggests that it could grow by 44.67%. Given that Arcosa has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Arcosa is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACA
    Arcosa
    5 0 0
    STRL
    Sterling Infrastructure
    3 0 0
  • Is ACA or STRL More Risky?

    Arcosa has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 14.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.836%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACA or STRL?

    Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACA or STRL?

    Arcosa quarterly revenues are $666.2M, which are larger than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $498.8M. Arcosa's net income of -$7.7M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $113.2M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.37x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 16.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.47x versus 2.02x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACA
    Arcosa
    1.47x 40.37x $666.2M -$7.7M
    STRL
    Sterling Infrastructure
    2.02x 16.56x $498.8M $113.2M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will NVIDIA Return to Its 52-Week High?
Will NVIDIA Return to Its 52-Week High?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been among the best-performing investments of the…

Will JP Morgan’s AI Advisor Be a Winner?
Will JP Morgan’s AI Advisor Be a Winner?

JPMorgan Chase is rolling out “JPM WealthAI for high-net-worth clients.…

Is Revolve Group Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Is Revolve Group Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?

Recently, Revolve Group (NYSE:RVLV) management delivered some fairly positive business…

Stock Ideas

Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Alerts

Buy
52
RGC alert for Apr 12

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 29.14% over the past day.

Buy
52
SLP alert for Apr 12

Simulations Plus [SLP] is up 26.73% over the past day.

Buy
89
GDXU alert for Apr 12

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 15.9% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock