ACM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fluor Corp. has a net margin of 3.58% compared to AECOM's net margin of -20.99%. AECOM's return on equity of 28.17% beat Fluor Corp.'s return on equity of 79.39%.

AECOM has a consensus price target of $143.33, signalling upside risk potential of 37.97%. On the other hand Fluor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $50.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.26%. Given that AECOM has higher upside potential than Fluor Corp., analysts believe AECOM is more attractive than Fluor Corp..

AECOM has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor Corp. has a beta of 1.313, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.295%.

AECOM has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. Fluor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AECOM pays 24.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AECOM's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AECOM quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Fluor Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.4B. AECOM's net income of $149.3M is higher than Fluor Corp.'s net income of -$707M. Notably, AECOM's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Fluor Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AECOM is 0.86x versus 0.48x for Fluor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jacobs Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 3.58% compared to AECOM's net margin of 4.29%. AECOM's return on equity of 28.17% beat Jacobs Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.69%.

AECOM has a consensus price target of $143.33, signalling upside risk potential of 37.97%. On the other hand Jacobs Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $156.53 which suggests that it could grow by 12.83%. Given that AECOM has higher upside potential than Jacobs Solutions, Inc., analysts believe AECOM is more attractive than Jacobs Solutions, Inc..

AECOM has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jacobs Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 0.806, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.431%.

AECOM has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. Jacobs Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. AECOM pays 24.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Jacobs Solutions, Inc. pays out 53.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AECOM quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Jacobs Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. AECOM's net income of $149.3M is higher than Jacobs Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $135.3M. Notably, AECOM's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Jacobs Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is 57.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AECOM is 0.86x versus 1.40x for Jacobs Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KBR, Inc. has a net margin of 3.58% compared to AECOM's net margin of 6.11%. AECOM's return on equity of 28.17% beat KBR, Inc.'s return on equity of 28.23%.

AECOM has a consensus price target of $143.33, signalling upside risk potential of 37.97%. On the other hand KBR, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $56.11 which suggests that it could grow by 28.2%. Given that AECOM has higher upside potential than KBR, Inc., analysts believe AECOM is more attractive than KBR, Inc..

AECOM has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KBR, Inc. has a beta of 0.539, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.146%.

AECOM has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. KBR, Inc. offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. AECOM pays 24.68% of its earnings as a dividend. KBR, Inc. pays out 21.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AECOM quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than KBR, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. AECOM's net income of $149.3M is higher than KBR, Inc.'s net income of $118M. Notably, AECOM's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while KBR, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AECOM is 0.86x versus 0.71x for KBR, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tetra Tech, Inc. has a net margin of 3.58% compared to AECOM's net margin of 9.61%. AECOM's return on equity of 28.17% beat Tetra Tech, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.39%.

AECOM has a consensus price target of $143.33, signalling upside risk potential of 37.97%. On the other hand Tetra Tech, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $42.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.38%. Given that AECOM has higher upside potential than Tetra Tech, Inc., analysts believe AECOM is more attractive than Tetra Tech, Inc..

AECOM has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tetra Tech, Inc. has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.812%.

AECOM has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1%. Tetra Tech, Inc. offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. AECOM pays 24.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Tetra Tech, Inc. pays out 26.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AECOM quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Tetra Tech, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. AECOM's net income of $149.3M is higher than Tetra Tech, Inc.'s net income of $127.9M. Notably, AECOM's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Tetra Tech, Inc.'s PE ratio is 37.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AECOM is 0.86x versus 1.70x for Tetra Tech, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.