WLHSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MPC Container Ships ASA has a net margin of 47.27% compared to Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA's net margin of 42.58%. Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA's return on equity of 21.28% beat MPC Container Ships ASA's return on equity of 29.83%.

Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MPC Container Ships ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA has higher upside potential than MPC Container Ships ASA, analysts believe Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA is more attractive than MPC Container Ships ASA.

Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MPC Container Ships ASA has a beta of 0.534, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.614%.

Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. MPC Container Ships ASA offers a yield of 15.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA pays -13.13% of its earnings as a dividend. MPC Container Ships ASA pays out 69.52% of its earnings as a dividend. MPC Container Ships ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $311M, which are larger than MPC Container Ships ASA quarterly revenues of $125.9M. Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA's net income of $147M is higher than MPC Container Ships ASA's net income of $53.6M. Notably, Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.23x while MPC Container Ships ASA's PE ratio is 3.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA is 1.15x versus 1.47x for MPC Container Ships ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NEL ASA has a net margin of 47.27% compared to Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA's net margin of -27.92%. Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA's return on equity of 21.28% beat NEL ASA's return on equity of -9.16%.

Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NEL ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA has higher upside potential than NEL ASA, analysts believe Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA is more attractive than NEL ASA.

Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NEL ASA has a beta of 1.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.918%.

Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. NEL ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA pays -13.13% of its earnings as a dividend. NEL ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $311M, which are larger than NEL ASA quarterly revenues of $30M. Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA's net income of $147M is higher than NEL ASA's net income of -$8.4M. Notably, Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.23x while NEL ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA is 1.15x versus 3.93x for NEL ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a net margin of 47.27% compared to Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA's net margin of 21.25%. Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA's return on equity of 21.28% beat Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's return on equity of 40.37%.

Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA has higher upside potential than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA, analysts believe Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA is more attractive than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA.

Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a beta of 1.546, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.568%.

Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA offers a yield of 5.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA pays -13.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $311M, which are smaller than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA's net income of $147M is lower than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's net income of $252.5M. Notably, Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.23x while Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's PE ratio is 7.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA is 1.15x versus 0.50x for Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tomra Systems ASA has a net margin of 47.27% compared to Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA's net margin of 5.56%. Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA's return on equity of 21.28% beat Tomra Systems ASA's return on equity of 17.24%.

Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tomra Systems ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA has higher upside potential than Tomra Systems ASA, analysts believe Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA is more attractive than Tomra Systems ASA.

Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tomra Systems ASA has a beta of 2.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.898%.

Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Tomra Systems ASA offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA pays -13.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Tomra Systems ASA pays out 39.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Tomra Systems ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $311M, which are smaller than Tomra Systems ASA quarterly revenues of $357.6M. Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA's net income of $147M is higher than Tomra Systems ASA's net income of $19.9M. Notably, Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.23x while Tomra Systems ASA's PE ratio is 35.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA is 1.15x versus 2.81x for Tomra Systems ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.