Financhill
Sell
42

NLLSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.28
Seasonality move :
-4.87%
Day range:
$0.26 - $0.29
52-week range:
$0.24 - $0.87
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
2.70x
P/B ratio:
0.97x
Volume:
6.7K
Avg. volume:
35.9K
1-year change:
-57.69%
Market cap:
$459.5M
Revenue:
$158.8M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.02

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
NLLSF
NEL ASA
-- -- -- -- --
ASCJF
AMSC ASA
-- -- -- -- --
BNHUF
Bonheur ASA
-- -- -- -- --
MPZZF
MPC Container Ships ASA
-- -- -- -- --
NWARF
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
-- -- -- -- --
TMRAY
Tomra Systems ASA
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
NLLSF
NEL ASA
$0.28 -- $459.5M -- $0.00 0% 2.70x
ASCJF
AMSC ASA
$2.25 -- $161.7M 0.80x $0.05 11.45% 1.82x
BNHUF
Bonheur ASA
$27.10 -- $1.2B 10.59x $0.56 2.07% 0.87x
MPZZF
MPC Container Ships ASA
$1.8100 -- $803.1M 3.35x $0.10 25.34% 1.43x
NWARF
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
$0.95 -- $915.7M 7.74x $0.00 0% 0.34x
TMRAY
Tomra Systems ASA
$13.69 -- $4B 68.45x $0.18 1.31% 2.84x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
NLLSF
NEL ASA
-- 0.592 -- 2.84x
ASCJF
AMSC ASA
-- -0.550 -- --
BNHUF
Bonheur ASA
54.9% 0.060 70.51% 1.59x
MPZZF
MPC Container Ships ASA
20.27% -0.724 19.88% 1.45x
NWARF
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
39.3% 3.056 37.11% 1.09x
TMRAY
Tomra Systems ASA
37.12% 3.000 8.53% 0.93x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
NLLSF
NEL ASA
$19.3M -$13.6M -4.76% -4.77% -32.93% -$19.5M
ASCJF
AMSC ASA
-- -$586.5K -- -- -- -$3.2M
BNHUF
Bonheur ASA
-- $60.7M 6.43% 14.2% 20.45% $12.8M
MPZZF
MPC Container Ships ASA
$83.4M $61.1M 25.7% 30.97% 51.25% -$38.7M
NWARF
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
$276.3M $199M 16.61% 28.28% 19.75% $73M
TMRAY
Tomra Systems ASA
$155.1M $42.9M 5.85% 9.02% 12.27% $110.1M

NEL ASA vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns NLLSF or ASCJF?

    AMSC ASA has a net margin of -31.47% compared to NEL ASA's net margin of --. NEL ASA's return on equity of -4.77% beat AMSC ASA's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    56.71% -$0.01 $471.5M
    ASCJF
    AMSC ASA
    -- $0.20 --
  • What do Analysts Say About NLLSF or ASCJF?

    NEL ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AMSC ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NEL ASA has higher upside potential than AMSC ASA, analysts believe NEL ASA is more attractive than AMSC ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    0 0 0
    ASCJF
    AMSC ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is NLLSF or ASCJF More Risky?

    NEL ASA has a beta of 1.895, which suggesting that the stock is 89.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMSC ASA has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.092%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NLLSF or ASCJF?

    NEL ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AMSC ASA offers a yield of 11.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. NEL ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AMSC ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NLLSF or ASCJF?

    NEL ASA quarterly revenues are $34.1M, which are larger than AMSC ASA quarterly revenues of --. NEL ASA's net income of -$10.7M is lower than AMSC ASA's net income of $14.4M. Notably, NEL ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AMSC ASA's PE ratio is 0.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NEL ASA is 2.70x versus 1.82x for AMSC ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    2.70x -- $34.1M -$10.7M
    ASCJF
    AMSC ASA
    1.82x 0.80x -- $14.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns NLLSF or BNHUF?

    Bonheur ASA has a net margin of -31.47% compared to NEL ASA's net margin of 7.53%. NEL ASA's return on equity of -4.77% beat Bonheur ASA's return on equity of 14.2%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    56.71% -$0.01 $471.5M
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    -- $0.60 $1.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About NLLSF or BNHUF?

    NEL ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bonheur ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NEL ASA has higher upside potential than Bonheur ASA, analysts believe NEL ASA is more attractive than Bonheur ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    0 0 0
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is NLLSF or BNHUF More Risky?

    NEL ASA has a beta of 1.895, which suggesting that the stock is 89.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bonheur ASA has a beta of -0.050, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.997%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NLLSF or BNHUF?

    NEL ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bonheur ASA offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. NEL ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bonheur ASA pays out 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Bonheur ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NLLSF or BNHUF?

    NEL ASA quarterly revenues are $34.1M, which are smaller than Bonheur ASA quarterly revenues of $335.4M. NEL ASA's net income of -$10.7M is lower than Bonheur ASA's net income of $25.3M. Notably, NEL ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bonheur ASA's PE ratio is 10.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NEL ASA is 2.70x versus 0.87x for Bonheur ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    2.70x -- $34.1M -$10.7M
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0.87x 10.59x $335.4M $25.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns NLLSF or MPZZF?

    MPC Container Ships ASA has a net margin of -31.47% compared to NEL ASA's net margin of 48.12%. NEL ASA's return on equity of -4.77% beat MPC Container Ships ASA's return on equity of 30.97%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    56.71% -$0.01 $471.5M
    MPZZF
    MPC Container Ships ASA
    62.95% $0.14 $1B
  • What do Analysts Say About NLLSF or MPZZF?

    NEL ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MPC Container Ships ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NEL ASA has higher upside potential than MPC Container Ships ASA, analysts believe NEL ASA is more attractive than MPC Container Ships ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    0 0 0
    MPZZF
    MPC Container Ships ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is NLLSF or MPZZF More Risky?

    NEL ASA has a beta of 1.895, which suggesting that the stock is 89.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MPC Container Ships ASA has a beta of 0.009, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.052%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NLLSF or MPZZF?

    NEL ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MPC Container Ships ASA offers a yield of 25.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. NEL ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MPC Container Ships ASA pays out 90.21% of its earnings as a dividend. MPC Container Ships ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NLLSF or MPZZF?

    NEL ASA quarterly revenues are $34.1M, which are smaller than MPC Container Ships ASA quarterly revenues of $132.4M. NEL ASA's net income of -$10.7M is lower than MPC Container Ships ASA's net income of $63.7M. Notably, NEL ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MPC Container Ships ASA's PE ratio is 3.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NEL ASA is 2.70x versus 1.43x for MPC Container Ships ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    2.70x -- $34.1M -$10.7M
    MPZZF
    MPC Container Ships ASA
    1.43x 3.35x $132.4M $63.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns NLLSF or NWARF?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a net margin of -31.47% compared to NEL ASA's net margin of 17.29%. NEL ASA's return on equity of -4.77% beat Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's return on equity of 28.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    56.71% -$0.01 $471.5M
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    25.6% $0.17 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About NLLSF or NWARF?

    NEL ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NEL ASA has higher upside potential than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA, analysts believe NEL ASA is more attractive than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    0 0 0
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is NLLSF or NWARF More Risky?

    NEL ASA has a beta of 1.895, which suggesting that the stock is 89.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a beta of 1.432, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.185%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NLLSF or NWARF?

    NEL ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NEL ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NLLSF or NWARF?

    NEL ASA quarterly revenues are $34.1M, which are smaller than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA quarterly revenues of $1.1B. NEL ASA's net income of -$10.7M is lower than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's net income of $186.6M. Notably, NEL ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's PE ratio is 7.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NEL ASA is 2.70x versus 0.34x for Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    2.70x -- $34.1M -$10.7M
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    0.34x 7.74x $1.1B $186.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns NLLSF or TMRAY?

    Tomra Systems ASA has a net margin of -31.47% compared to NEL ASA's net margin of 6.14%. NEL ASA's return on equity of -4.77% beat Tomra Systems ASA's return on equity of 9.02%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    56.71% -$0.01 $471.5M
    TMRAY
    Tomra Systems ASA
    43.25% $0.08 $1B
  • What do Analysts Say About NLLSF or TMRAY?

    NEL ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tomra Systems ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NEL ASA has higher upside potential than Tomra Systems ASA, analysts believe NEL ASA is more attractive than Tomra Systems ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    0 0 0
    TMRAY
    Tomra Systems ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is NLLSF or TMRAY More Risky?

    NEL ASA has a beta of 1.895, which suggesting that the stock is 89.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tomra Systems ASA has a beta of 1.848, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.829%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NLLSF or TMRAY?

    NEL ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tomra Systems ASA offers a yield of 1.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. NEL ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tomra Systems ASA pays out 76.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Tomra Systems ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NLLSF or TMRAY?

    NEL ASA quarterly revenues are $34.1M, which are smaller than Tomra Systems ASA quarterly revenues of $358.5M. NEL ASA's net income of -$10.7M is lower than Tomra Systems ASA's net income of $22M. Notably, NEL ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tomra Systems ASA's PE ratio is 68.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NEL ASA is 2.70x versus 2.84x for Tomra Systems ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    2.70x -- $34.1M -$10.7M
    TMRAY
    Tomra Systems ASA
    2.84x 68.45x $358.5M $22M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?

With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…

Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?

If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…

3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks

Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…

Stock Ideas

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x

Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8

Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.

Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8

UniFirst [UNF] is up 20.59% over the past day.

Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8

Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 19.13% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock