Financhill
Buy
62

BNHUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$27.10
Seasonality move :
1.5%
Day range:
$27.10 - $27.10
52-week range:
$27.10 - $27.10
Dividend yield:
2.07%
P/E ratio:
10.59x
P/S ratio:
0.87x
P/B ratio:
1.57x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$1.2B
Revenue:
$1.2B
EPS (TTM):
$2.56

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
BNHUF
Bonheur ASA
-- -- -- -- --
ASCJF
AMSC ASA
-- -- -- -- --
MPZZF
MPC Container Ships ASA
-- -- -- -- --
NLLSF
NEL ASA
-- -- -- -- --
NWARF
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
-- -- -- -- --
TMRAY
Tomra Systems ASA
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
BNHUF
Bonheur ASA
$27.10 -- $1.2B 10.59x $0.56 2.07% 0.87x
ASCJF
AMSC ASA
$2.25 -- $161.7M 0.80x $0.05 11.45% 1.82x
MPZZF
MPC Container Ships ASA
$1.8100 -- $803.1M 3.35x $0.10 25.34% 1.43x
NLLSF
NEL ASA
$0.28 -- $459.5M -- $0.00 0% 2.70x
NWARF
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
$0.95 -- $915.7M 7.74x $0.00 0% 0.34x
TMRAY
Tomra Systems ASA
$13.69 -- $4B 68.45x $0.18 1.31% 2.84x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
BNHUF
Bonheur ASA
54.9% 0.060 70.51% 1.59x
ASCJF
AMSC ASA
-- -0.550 -- --
MPZZF
MPC Container Ships ASA
20.27% -0.724 19.88% 1.45x
NLLSF
NEL ASA
-- 0.592 -- 2.84x
NWARF
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
39.3% 3.056 37.11% 1.09x
TMRAY
Tomra Systems ASA
37.12% 3.000 8.53% 0.93x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
BNHUF
Bonheur ASA
-- $60.7M 6.43% 14.2% 20.45% $12.8M
ASCJF
AMSC ASA
-- -$586.5K -- -- -- -$3.2M
MPZZF
MPC Container Ships ASA
$83.4M $61.1M 25.7% 30.97% 51.25% -$38.7M
NLLSF
NEL ASA
$19.3M -$13.6M -4.76% -4.77% -32.93% -$19.5M
NWARF
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
$276.3M $199M 16.61% 28.28% 19.75% $73M
TMRAY
Tomra Systems ASA
$155.1M $42.9M 5.85% 9.02% 12.27% $110.1M

Bonheur ASA vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns BNHUF or ASCJF?

    AMSC ASA has a net margin of 7.53% compared to Bonheur ASA's net margin of --. Bonheur ASA's return on equity of 14.2% beat AMSC ASA's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    -- $0.60 $1.8B
    ASCJF
    AMSC ASA
    -- $0.20 --
  • What do Analysts Say About BNHUF or ASCJF?

    Bonheur ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AMSC ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bonheur ASA has higher upside potential than AMSC ASA, analysts believe Bonheur ASA is more attractive than AMSC ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0 0 0
    ASCJF
    AMSC ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is BNHUF or ASCJF More Risky?

    Bonheur ASA has a beta of -0.050, which suggesting that the stock is 104.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMSC ASA has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.092%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BNHUF or ASCJF?

    Bonheur ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. AMSC ASA offers a yield of 11.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Bonheur ASA pays 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. AMSC ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bonheur ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BNHUF or ASCJF?

    Bonheur ASA quarterly revenues are $335.4M, which are larger than AMSC ASA quarterly revenues of --. Bonheur ASA's net income of $25.3M is higher than AMSC ASA's net income of $14.4M. Notably, Bonheur ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.59x while AMSC ASA's PE ratio is 0.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bonheur ASA is 0.87x versus 1.82x for AMSC ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0.87x 10.59x $335.4M $25.3M
    ASCJF
    AMSC ASA
    1.82x 0.80x -- $14.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns BNHUF or MPZZF?

    MPC Container Ships ASA has a net margin of 7.53% compared to Bonheur ASA's net margin of 48.12%. Bonheur ASA's return on equity of 14.2% beat MPC Container Ships ASA's return on equity of 30.97%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    -- $0.60 $1.8B
    MPZZF
    MPC Container Ships ASA
    62.95% $0.14 $1B
  • What do Analysts Say About BNHUF or MPZZF?

    Bonheur ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MPC Container Ships ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bonheur ASA has higher upside potential than MPC Container Ships ASA, analysts believe Bonheur ASA is more attractive than MPC Container Ships ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0 0 0
    MPZZF
    MPC Container Ships ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is BNHUF or MPZZF More Risky?

    Bonheur ASA has a beta of -0.050, which suggesting that the stock is 104.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MPC Container Ships ASA has a beta of 0.009, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.052%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BNHUF or MPZZF?

    Bonheur ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. MPC Container Ships ASA offers a yield of 25.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Bonheur ASA pays 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. MPC Container Ships ASA pays out 90.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BNHUF or MPZZF?

    Bonheur ASA quarterly revenues are $335.4M, which are larger than MPC Container Ships ASA quarterly revenues of $132.4M. Bonheur ASA's net income of $25.3M is lower than MPC Container Ships ASA's net income of $63.7M. Notably, Bonheur ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.59x while MPC Container Ships ASA's PE ratio is 3.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bonheur ASA is 0.87x versus 1.43x for MPC Container Ships ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0.87x 10.59x $335.4M $25.3M
    MPZZF
    MPC Container Ships ASA
    1.43x 3.35x $132.4M $63.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns BNHUF or NLLSF?

    NEL ASA has a net margin of 7.53% compared to Bonheur ASA's net margin of -31.47%. Bonheur ASA's return on equity of 14.2% beat NEL ASA's return on equity of -4.77%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    -- $0.60 $1.8B
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    56.71% -$0.01 $471.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About BNHUF or NLLSF?

    Bonheur ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NEL ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bonheur ASA has higher upside potential than NEL ASA, analysts believe Bonheur ASA is more attractive than NEL ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0 0 0
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is BNHUF or NLLSF More Risky?

    Bonheur ASA has a beta of -0.050, which suggesting that the stock is 104.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NEL ASA has a beta of 1.895, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.52%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BNHUF or NLLSF?

    Bonheur ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. NEL ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bonheur ASA pays 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. NEL ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bonheur ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BNHUF or NLLSF?

    Bonheur ASA quarterly revenues are $335.4M, which are larger than NEL ASA quarterly revenues of $34.1M. Bonheur ASA's net income of $25.3M is higher than NEL ASA's net income of -$10.7M. Notably, Bonheur ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.59x while NEL ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bonheur ASA is 0.87x versus 2.70x for NEL ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0.87x 10.59x $335.4M $25.3M
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    2.70x -- $34.1M -$10.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns BNHUF or NWARF?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a net margin of 7.53% compared to Bonheur ASA's net margin of 17.29%. Bonheur ASA's return on equity of 14.2% beat Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's return on equity of 28.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    -- $0.60 $1.8B
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    25.6% $0.17 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About BNHUF or NWARF?

    Bonheur ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bonheur ASA has higher upside potential than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA, analysts believe Bonheur ASA is more attractive than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0 0 0
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is BNHUF or NWARF More Risky?

    Bonheur ASA has a beta of -0.050, which suggesting that the stock is 104.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a beta of 1.432, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.185%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BNHUF or NWARF?

    Bonheur ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bonheur ASA pays 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bonheur ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BNHUF or NWARF?

    Bonheur ASA quarterly revenues are $335.4M, which are smaller than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Bonheur ASA's net income of $25.3M is lower than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's net income of $186.6M. Notably, Bonheur ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.59x while Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's PE ratio is 7.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bonheur ASA is 0.87x versus 0.34x for Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0.87x 10.59x $335.4M $25.3M
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    0.34x 7.74x $1.1B $186.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns BNHUF or TMRAY?

    Tomra Systems ASA has a net margin of 7.53% compared to Bonheur ASA's net margin of 6.14%. Bonheur ASA's return on equity of 14.2% beat Tomra Systems ASA's return on equity of 9.02%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    -- $0.60 $1.8B
    TMRAY
    Tomra Systems ASA
    43.25% $0.08 $1B
  • What do Analysts Say About BNHUF or TMRAY?

    Bonheur ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tomra Systems ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bonheur ASA has higher upside potential than Tomra Systems ASA, analysts believe Bonheur ASA is more attractive than Tomra Systems ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0 0 0
    TMRAY
    Tomra Systems ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is BNHUF or TMRAY More Risky?

    Bonheur ASA has a beta of -0.050, which suggesting that the stock is 104.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tomra Systems ASA has a beta of 1.848, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.829%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BNHUF or TMRAY?

    Bonheur ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Tomra Systems ASA offers a yield of 1.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Bonheur ASA pays 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Tomra Systems ASA pays out 76.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BNHUF or TMRAY?

    Bonheur ASA quarterly revenues are $335.4M, which are smaller than Tomra Systems ASA quarterly revenues of $358.5M. Bonheur ASA's net income of $25.3M is higher than Tomra Systems ASA's net income of $22M. Notably, Bonheur ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.59x while Tomra Systems ASA's PE ratio is 68.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bonheur ASA is 0.87x versus 2.84x for Tomra Systems ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0.87x 10.59x $335.4M $25.3M
    TMRAY
    Tomra Systems ASA
    2.84x 68.45x $358.5M $22M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will Cisco Systems Stock Be in 10 Years?
Where Will Cisco Systems Stock Be in 10 Years?

Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CSCO) has enjoyed its position as a…

Disney vs Estée Lauder Stock, Which Is Best?
Disney vs Estée Lauder Stock, Which Is Best?

Inflation has eaten away at a lot of the money…

Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?

With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…

Stock Ideas

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x

Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8

Inari Medical [NARI] is down 0.23% over the past day.

Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8

UniFirst [UNF] is up 4.97% over the past day.

Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8

Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 8.78% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock