Financhill
Buy
55

NWARF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.95
Seasonality move :
-7.71%
Day range:
$0.95 - $0.95
52-week range:
$0.86 - $1.87
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
7.74x
P/S ratio:
0.34x
P/B ratio:
1.35x
Volume:
100
Avg. volume:
5.3K
1-year change:
-13.24%
Market cap:
$915.7M
Revenue:
$2.4B
EPS (TTM):
$0.12

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
NWARF
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
-- -- -- -- --
ASCJF
AMSC ASA
-- -- -- -- --
BNHUF
Bonheur ASA
-- -- -- -- --
MPZZF
MPC Container Ships ASA
-- -- -- -- --
NLLSF
NEL ASA
-- -- -- -- --
TMRAY
Tomra Systems ASA
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
NWARF
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
$0.95 -- $915.7M 7.74x $0.00 0% 0.34x
ASCJF
AMSC ASA
$2.25 -- $161.7M 0.80x $0.05 11.45% 1.82x
BNHUF
Bonheur ASA
$27.10 -- $1.2B 10.59x $0.56 2.07% 0.87x
MPZZF
MPC Container Ships ASA
$1.8100 -- $803.1M 3.35x $0.10 25.34% 1.43x
NLLSF
NEL ASA
$0.28 -- $459.5M -- $0.00 0% 2.70x
TMRAY
Tomra Systems ASA
$13.69 -- $4B 68.45x $0.18 1.31% 2.84x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
NWARF
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
39.3% 3.056 37.11% 1.09x
ASCJF
AMSC ASA
-- -0.550 -- --
BNHUF
Bonheur ASA
54.9% 0.060 70.51% 1.59x
MPZZF
MPC Container Ships ASA
20.27% -0.724 19.88% 1.45x
NLLSF
NEL ASA
-- 0.592 -- 2.84x
TMRAY
Tomra Systems ASA
37.12% 3.000 8.53% 0.93x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
NWARF
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
$276.3M $199M 16.61% 28.28% 19.75% $73M
ASCJF
AMSC ASA
-- -$586.5K -- -- -- -$3.2M
BNHUF
Bonheur ASA
-- $60.7M 6.43% 14.2% 20.45% $12.8M
MPZZF
MPC Container Ships ASA
$83.4M $61.1M 25.7% 30.97% 51.25% -$38.7M
NLLSF
NEL ASA
$19.3M -$13.6M -4.76% -4.77% -32.93% -$19.5M
TMRAY
Tomra Systems ASA
$155.1M $42.9M 5.85% 9.02% 12.27% $110.1M

Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns NWARF or ASCJF?

    AMSC ASA has a net margin of 17.29% compared to Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's net margin of --. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's return on equity of 28.28% beat AMSC ASA's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    25.6% $0.17 $1.1B
    ASCJF
    AMSC ASA
    -- $0.20 --
  • What do Analysts Say About NWARF or ASCJF?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AMSC ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has higher upside potential than AMSC ASA, analysts believe Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA is more attractive than AMSC ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    0 0 0
    ASCJF
    AMSC ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is NWARF or ASCJF More Risky?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a beta of 1.432, which suggesting that the stock is 43.185% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMSC ASA has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.092%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NWARF or ASCJF?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AMSC ASA offers a yield of 11.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AMSC ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NWARF or ASCJF?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than AMSC ASA quarterly revenues of --. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's net income of $186.6M is higher than AMSC ASA's net income of $14.4M. Notably, Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.74x while AMSC ASA's PE ratio is 0.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA is 0.34x versus 1.82x for AMSC ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    0.34x 7.74x $1.1B $186.6M
    ASCJF
    AMSC ASA
    1.82x 0.80x -- $14.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns NWARF or BNHUF?

    Bonheur ASA has a net margin of 17.29% compared to Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's net margin of 7.53%. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's return on equity of 28.28% beat Bonheur ASA's return on equity of 14.2%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    25.6% $0.17 $1.1B
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    -- $0.60 $1.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About NWARF or BNHUF?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bonheur ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has higher upside potential than Bonheur ASA, analysts believe Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA is more attractive than Bonheur ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    0 0 0
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is NWARF or BNHUF More Risky?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a beta of 1.432, which suggesting that the stock is 43.185% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bonheur ASA has a beta of -0.050, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.997%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NWARF or BNHUF?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bonheur ASA offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bonheur ASA pays out 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Bonheur ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NWARF or BNHUF?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Bonheur ASA quarterly revenues of $335.4M. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's net income of $186.6M is higher than Bonheur ASA's net income of $25.3M. Notably, Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.74x while Bonheur ASA's PE ratio is 10.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA is 0.34x versus 0.87x for Bonheur ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    0.34x 7.74x $1.1B $186.6M
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0.87x 10.59x $335.4M $25.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns NWARF or MPZZF?

    MPC Container Ships ASA has a net margin of 17.29% compared to Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's net margin of 48.12%. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's return on equity of 28.28% beat MPC Container Ships ASA's return on equity of 30.97%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    25.6% $0.17 $1.1B
    MPZZF
    MPC Container Ships ASA
    62.95% $0.14 $1B
  • What do Analysts Say About NWARF or MPZZF?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MPC Container Ships ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has higher upside potential than MPC Container Ships ASA, analysts believe Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA is more attractive than MPC Container Ships ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    0 0 0
    MPZZF
    MPC Container Ships ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is NWARF or MPZZF More Risky?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a beta of 1.432, which suggesting that the stock is 43.185% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MPC Container Ships ASA has a beta of 0.009, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.052%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NWARF or MPZZF?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MPC Container Ships ASA offers a yield of 25.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MPC Container Ships ASA pays out 90.21% of its earnings as a dividend. MPC Container Ships ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NWARF or MPZZF?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than MPC Container Ships ASA quarterly revenues of $132.4M. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's net income of $186.6M is higher than MPC Container Ships ASA's net income of $63.7M. Notably, Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.74x while MPC Container Ships ASA's PE ratio is 3.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA is 0.34x versus 1.43x for MPC Container Ships ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    0.34x 7.74x $1.1B $186.6M
    MPZZF
    MPC Container Ships ASA
    1.43x 3.35x $132.4M $63.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns NWARF or NLLSF?

    NEL ASA has a net margin of 17.29% compared to Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's net margin of -31.47%. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's return on equity of 28.28% beat NEL ASA's return on equity of -4.77%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    25.6% $0.17 $1.1B
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    56.71% -$0.01 $471.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About NWARF or NLLSF?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NEL ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has higher upside potential than NEL ASA, analysts believe Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA is more attractive than NEL ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    0 0 0
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is NWARF or NLLSF More Risky?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a beta of 1.432, which suggesting that the stock is 43.185% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NEL ASA has a beta of 1.895, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.52%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NWARF or NLLSF?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NEL ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NEL ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NWARF or NLLSF?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than NEL ASA quarterly revenues of $34.1M. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's net income of $186.6M is higher than NEL ASA's net income of -$10.7M. Notably, Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.74x while NEL ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA is 0.34x versus 2.70x for NEL ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    0.34x 7.74x $1.1B $186.6M
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    2.70x -- $34.1M -$10.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns NWARF or TMRAY?

    Tomra Systems ASA has a net margin of 17.29% compared to Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's net margin of 6.14%. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's return on equity of 28.28% beat Tomra Systems ASA's return on equity of 9.02%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    25.6% $0.17 $1.1B
    TMRAY
    Tomra Systems ASA
    43.25% $0.08 $1B
  • What do Analysts Say About NWARF or TMRAY?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tomra Systems ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has higher upside potential than Tomra Systems ASA, analysts believe Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA is more attractive than Tomra Systems ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    0 0 0
    TMRAY
    Tomra Systems ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is NWARF or TMRAY More Risky?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a beta of 1.432, which suggesting that the stock is 43.185% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tomra Systems ASA has a beta of 1.848, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.829%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NWARF or TMRAY?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tomra Systems ASA offers a yield of 1.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tomra Systems ASA pays out 76.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Tomra Systems ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NWARF or TMRAY?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Tomra Systems ASA quarterly revenues of $358.5M. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's net income of $186.6M is higher than Tomra Systems ASA's net income of $22M. Notably, Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.74x while Tomra Systems ASA's PE ratio is 68.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA is 0.34x versus 2.84x for Tomra Systems ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    0.34x 7.74x $1.1B $186.6M
    TMRAY
    Tomra Systems ASA
    2.84x 68.45x $358.5M $22M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?

With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…

Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?

If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…

3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks

Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…

Stock Ideas

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x

Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8

Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.

Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8

UniFirst [UNF] is up 20.59% over the past day.

Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8

Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 19.13% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock