WAWIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MPC Container Ships ASA has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's net margin of 42.58%. Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's return on equity of 38.53% beat MPC Container Ships ASA's return on equity of 29.83%.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MPC Container Ships ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA has higher upside potential than MPC Container Ships ASA, analysts believe Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA is more attractive than MPC Container Ships ASA.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MPC Container Ships ASA has a beta of 0.510, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.015%.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 24.81%. MPC Container Ships ASA offers a yield of 15.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA pays 53.53% of its earnings as a dividend. MPC Container Ships ASA pays out 69.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than MPC Container Ships ASA quarterly revenues of $125.9M. Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's net income of $280M is higher than MPC Container Ships ASA's net income of $53.6M. Notably, Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.76x while MPC Container Ships ASA's PE ratio is 3.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA is 0.79x versus 1.52x for MPC Container Ships ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NEL ASA has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's net margin of -27.92%. Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's return on equity of 38.53% beat NEL ASA's return on equity of -9.16%.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NEL ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA has higher upside potential than NEL ASA, analysts believe Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA is more attractive than NEL ASA.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NEL ASA has a beta of 1.648, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.838%.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 24.81%. NEL ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA pays 53.53% of its earnings as a dividend. NEL ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than NEL ASA quarterly revenues of $30M. Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's net income of $280M is higher than NEL ASA's net income of -$8.4M. Notably, Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.76x while NEL ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA is 0.79x versus 4.22x for NEL ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's net margin of 21.25%. Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's return on equity of 38.53% beat Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's return on equity of 40.37%.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA has higher upside potential than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA, analysts believe Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA is more attractive than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a beta of 1.842, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.156%.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 24.81%. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA offers a yield of 5.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA pays 53.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's net income of $280M is higher than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's net income of $252.5M. Notably, Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.76x while Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's PE ratio is 7.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA is 0.79x versus 0.50x for Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tomra Systems ASA has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's net margin of 5.56%. Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's return on equity of 38.53% beat Tomra Systems ASA's return on equity of 17.24%.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tomra Systems ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA has higher upside potential than Tomra Systems ASA, analysts believe Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA is more attractive than Tomra Systems ASA.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tomra Systems ASA has a beta of 2.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.917%.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 24.81%. Tomra Systems ASA offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA pays 53.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Tomra Systems ASA pays out 39.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Tomra Systems ASA quarterly revenues of $357.6M. Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's net income of $280M is higher than Tomra Systems ASA's net income of $19.9M. Notably, Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.76x while Tomra Systems ASA's PE ratio is 35.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA is 0.79x versus 2.77x for Tomra Systems ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.