Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Sell
43
SWRAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.09
Seasonality move
:
0.22%
Day range:
$8.08 - $8.42
52-week range:
$7.77 - $9.63
Dividend yield:
5.4%
P/E ratio:
113.15x
P/S ratio:
0.84x
P/B ratio:
0.96x
Volume:
28.7K
Avg. volume:
33.1K
1-year change:
-11.72%
Market cap:
$29.3B
Revenue:
$10.5B
EPS (TTM):
$0.12
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWRAY
Swire Pacific Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWRAY
Swire Pacific Ltd.
|
$8.09 | -- | $29.3B | 113.15x | $0.17 | 5.4% | 0.84x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$0.36 | -- | $8.9M | 810.21x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.56x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
$1.23 | -- | $9.4M | 11.50x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.62x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$1.66 | -- | $7.6M | 75.33x | $0.05 | 0% | 1.21x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
$5.24 | -- | $108.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 18.65x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
$1.82 | -- | $108.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 32.99x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWRAY
Swire Pacific Ltd.
|
27.57% | -0.679 | -- | 0.65x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
3.68% | -2.181 | 1.05% | 5.03x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | 1.418 | -- | 1.59x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
7.57% | 0.683 | 7.57% | 2.98x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
2.59% | 4.234 | 5.34% | 1.88x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | 4.699 | -- | 6.29x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWRAY
Swire Pacific Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.3% | 0.39% | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$384.3K | -$268.8K | -122.09% | -124.48% | -7.04% | -$727.4K |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 13.66% | 13.71% | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$301K | -$542K | -7.38% | -8.32% | -45.93% | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -17.65% | -18.39% | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -55.86% | -55.86% | -- | -- |
Swire Pacific Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SWRAY or CIIT?
Tianci International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Swire Pacific Ltd.'s net margin of -7.04%. Swire Pacific Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.39% beat Tianci International, Inc.'s return on equity of -124.48%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWRAYSwire Pacific Ltd.-- -- $52.5B CIITTianci International, Inc.10.07% -$0.02 $2.8M -
What do Analysts Say About SWRAY or CIIT?
Swire Pacific Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tianci International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swire Pacific Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tianci International, Inc., analysts believe Swire Pacific Ltd. is more attractive than Tianci International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWRAYSwire Pacific Ltd.0 0 0 CIITTianci International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SWRAY or CIIT More Risky?
Swire Pacific Ltd. has a beta of 0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 87.405% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tianci International, Inc. has a beta of -2.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 385.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWRAY or CIIT?
Swire Pacific Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.4%. Tianci International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Swire Pacific Ltd. pays 99.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Tianci International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Swire Pacific Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWRAY or CIIT?
Swire Pacific Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tianci International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Swire Pacific Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tianci International, Inc.'s net income of -$268.9K. Notably, Swire Pacific Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 113.15x while Tianci International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 810.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swire Pacific Ltd. is 0.84x versus 0.56x for Tianci International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWRAYSwire Pacific Ltd.0.84x 113.15x -- -- CIITTianci International, Inc.0.56x 810.21x $3.8M -$268.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns SWRAY or CLWT?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Swire Pacific Ltd.'s net margin of --. Swire Pacific Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.39% beat Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWRAYSwire Pacific Ltd.-- -- $52.5B CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.-- -- $15.8M -
What do Analysts Say About SWRAY or CLWT?
Swire Pacific Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swire Pacific Ltd. has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd., analysts believe Swire Pacific Ltd. is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWRAYSwire Pacific Ltd.0 0 0 CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SWRAY or CLWT More Risky?
Swire Pacific Ltd. has a beta of 0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 87.405% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.879, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.111%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWRAY or CLWT?
Swire Pacific Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.4%. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Swire Pacific Ltd. pays 99.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Swire Pacific Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWRAY or CLWT?
Swire Pacific Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Swire Pacific Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Swire Pacific Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 113.15x while Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swire Pacific Ltd. is 0.84x versus 0.62x for Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWRAYSwire Pacific Ltd.0.84x 113.15x -- -- CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0.62x 11.50x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SWRAY or HIHO?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Swire Pacific Ltd.'s net margin of -31.53%. Swire Pacific Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.39% beat Highway Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWRAYSwire Pacific Ltd.-- -- $52.5B HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.25.51% -$0.08 $6.5M -
What do Analysts Say About SWRAY or HIHO?
Swire Pacific Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swire Pacific Ltd. has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Swire Pacific Ltd. is more attractive than Highway Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWRAYSwire Pacific Ltd.0 0 0 HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SWRAY or HIHO More Risky?
Swire Pacific Ltd. has a beta of 0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 87.405% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.379, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.149%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWRAY or HIHO?
Swire Pacific Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.4%. Highway Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Swire Pacific Ltd. pays 99.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings Ltd. pays out 497.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Swire Pacific Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Highway Holdings Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWRAY or HIHO?
Swire Pacific Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.2M. Swire Pacific Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$372K. Notably, Swire Pacific Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 113.15x while Highway Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 75.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swire Pacific Ltd. is 0.84x versus 1.21x for Highway Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWRAYSwire Pacific Ltd.0.84x 113.15x -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.1.21x 75.33x $1.2M -$372K
-
Which has Higher Returns SWRAY or ILAG?
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Swire Pacific Ltd.'s net margin of --. Swire Pacific Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.39% beat Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWRAYSwire Pacific Ltd.-- -- $52.5B ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.-- -- $14.5M -
What do Analysts Say About SWRAY or ILAG?
Swire Pacific Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swire Pacific Ltd. has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc., analysts believe Swire Pacific Ltd. is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWRAYSwire Pacific Ltd.0 0 0 ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SWRAY or ILAG More Risky?
Swire Pacific Ltd. has a beta of 0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 87.405% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWRAY or ILAG?
Swire Pacific Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.4%. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Swire Pacific Ltd. pays 99.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Swire Pacific Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWRAY or ILAG?
Swire Pacific Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Swire Pacific Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Swire Pacific Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 113.15x while Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swire Pacific Ltd. is 0.84x versus 18.65x for Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWRAYSwire Pacific Ltd.0.84x 113.15x -- -- ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.18.65x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SWRAY or ROMA?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Swire Pacific Ltd.'s net margin of --. Swire Pacific Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.39% beat Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s return on equity of -55.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWRAYSwire Pacific Ltd.-- -- $52.5B ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.-- -- $7.6M -
What do Analysts Say About SWRAY or ROMA?
Swire Pacific Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roma Green Finance Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swire Pacific Ltd. has higher upside potential than Roma Green Finance Ltd., analysts believe Swire Pacific Ltd. is more attractive than Roma Green Finance Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWRAYSwire Pacific Ltd.0 0 0 ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SWRAY or ROMA More Risky?
Swire Pacific Ltd. has a beta of 0.126, which suggesting that the stock is 87.405% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWRAY or ROMA?
Swire Pacific Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.4%. Roma Green Finance Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Swire Pacific Ltd. pays 99.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Roma Green Finance Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Swire Pacific Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWRAY or ROMA?
Swire Pacific Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roma Green Finance Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Swire Pacific Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Swire Pacific Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 113.15x while Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swire Pacific Ltd. is 0.84x versus 32.99x for Roma Green Finance Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWRAYSwire Pacific Ltd.0.84x 113.15x -- -- ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.32.99x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 27.67% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 18.01% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 18.81% over the past day.
