Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
50
SWRAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.93
Seasonality move
:
-0.36%
Day range:
$8.53 - $8.99
52-week range:
$7.49 - $9.46
Dividend yield:
4.66%
P/E ratio:
7.54x
P/S ratio:
6.05x
P/B ratio:
0.97x
Volume:
85.9K
Avg. volume:
30.9K
1-year change:
14.78%
Market cap:
$32.8B
Revenue:
$12.1B
EPS (TTM):
$1.18
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWRAY
Swire Pacific
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWRAY
Swire Pacific
|
$8.93 | -- | $32.8B | 7.54x | $0.16 | 4.66% | 6.05x |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
$0.55 | -- | $5.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
$1.49 | -- | $11.5M | 5.32x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.67x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
$1.90 | -- | $8.4M | -- | $0.05 | 6.32% | 1.11x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
$0.96 | -- | $17.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
$1.87 | -- | $28.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWRAY
Swire Pacific
|
23.22% | 0.660 | 25.56% | 0.61x |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | 1.447 | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | 0.101 | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
-- | 0.211 | 0.54% | 2.04x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -2.356 | -- | -- |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -2.370 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWRAY
Swire Pacific
|
-- | -- | 7.21% | 8.94% | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
$834K | $110K | -7.29% | -7.17% | 5.2% | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Swire Pacific vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SWRAY or CHNR?
China Natural Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Swire Pacific's net margin of --. Swire Pacific's return on equity of 8.94% beat China Natural Resources's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWRAYSwire Pacific-- -- $51.4B CHNRChina Natural Resources-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SWRAY or CHNR?
Swire Pacific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Natural Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swire Pacific has higher upside potential than China Natural Resources, analysts believe Swire Pacific is more attractive than China Natural Resources.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWRAYSwire Pacific0 0 0 CHNRChina Natural Resources0 0 0 -
Is SWRAY or CHNR More Risky?
Swire Pacific has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.779%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWRAY or CHNR?
Swire Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.66%. China Natural Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Swire Pacific pays 55.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Natural Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Swire Pacific's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWRAY or CHNR?
Swire Pacific quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Natural Resources quarterly revenues of --. Swire Pacific's net income of -- is lower than China Natural Resources's net income of --. Notably, Swire Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.54x while China Natural Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swire Pacific is 6.05x versus -- for China Natural Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWRAYSwire Pacific6.05x 7.54x -- -- CHNRChina Natural Resources-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SWRAY or CLWT?
Euro Tech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Swire Pacific's net margin of --. Swire Pacific's return on equity of 8.94% beat Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWRAYSwire Pacific-- -- $51.4B CLWTEuro Tech Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SWRAY or CLWT?
Swire Pacific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swire Pacific has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings, analysts believe Swire Pacific is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWRAYSwire Pacific0 0 0 CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0 0 0 -
Is SWRAY or CLWT More Risky?
Swire Pacific has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.598, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.226%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWRAY or CLWT?
Swire Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.66%. Euro Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Swire Pacific pays 55.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings pays out 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWRAY or CLWT?
Swire Pacific quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Swire Pacific's net income of -- is lower than Euro Tech Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Swire Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.54x while Euro Tech Holdings's PE ratio is 5.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swire Pacific is 6.05x versus 0.67x for Euro Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWRAYSwire Pacific6.05x 7.54x -- -- CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0.67x 5.32x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SWRAY or HIHO?
Highway Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Swire Pacific's net margin of 10.91%. Swire Pacific's return on equity of 8.94% beat Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWRAYSwire Pacific-- -- $51.4B HIHOHighway Holdings39.4% $0.05 $6.8M -
What do Analysts Say About SWRAY or HIHO?
Swire Pacific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swire Pacific has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings, analysts believe Swire Pacific is more attractive than Highway Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWRAYSwire Pacific0 0 0 HIHOHighway Holdings0 0 0 -
Is SWRAY or HIHO More Risky?
Swire Pacific has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.035, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.549%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWRAY or HIHO?
Swire Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.66%. Highway Holdings offers a yield of 6.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Swire Pacific pays 55.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings pays out -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Swire Pacific's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWRAY or HIHO?
Swire Pacific quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Swire Pacific's net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings's net income of $231K. Notably, Swire Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.54x while Highway Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swire Pacific is 6.05x versus 1.11x for Highway Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWRAYSwire Pacific6.05x 7.54x -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings1.11x -- $2.1M $231K
-
Which has Higher Returns SWRAY or ILAG?
Intelligent Living Application Group has a net margin of -- compared to Swire Pacific's net margin of --. Swire Pacific's return on equity of 8.94% beat Intelligent Living Application Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWRAYSwire Pacific-- -- $51.4B ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SWRAY or ILAG?
Swire Pacific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swire Pacific has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, analysts believe Swire Pacific is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWRAYSwire Pacific0 0 0 ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group0 0 0 -
Is SWRAY or ILAG More Risky?
Swire Pacific has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWRAY or ILAG?
Swire Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.66%. Intelligent Living Application Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Swire Pacific pays 55.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Swire Pacific's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWRAY or ILAG?
Swire Pacific quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group quarterly revenues of --. Swire Pacific's net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group's net income of --. Notably, Swire Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.54x while Intelligent Living Application Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swire Pacific is 6.05x versus -- for Intelligent Living Application Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWRAYSwire Pacific6.05x 7.54x -- -- ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SWRAY or WLGS?
WANG & LEE Group has a net margin of -- compared to Swire Pacific's net margin of --. Swire Pacific's return on equity of 8.94% beat WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWRAYSwire Pacific-- -- $51.4B WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SWRAY or WLGS?
Swire Pacific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WANG & LEE Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swire Pacific has higher upside potential than WANG & LEE Group, analysts believe Swire Pacific is more attractive than WANG & LEE Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWRAYSwire Pacific0 0 0 WLGSWANG & LEE Group0 0 0 -
Is SWRAY or WLGS More Risky?
Swire Pacific has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWRAY or WLGS?
Swire Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.66%. WANG & LEE Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Swire Pacific pays 55.83% of its earnings as a dividend. WANG & LEE Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Swire Pacific's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWRAY or WLGS?
Swire Pacific quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues of --. Swire Pacific's net income of -- is lower than WANG & LEE Group's net income of --. Notably, Swire Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.54x while WANG & LEE Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swire Pacific is 6.05x versus -- for WANG & LEE Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWRAYSwire Pacific6.05x 7.54x -- -- WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
