Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
37
CLWT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.22
Seasonality move
:
-1.88%
Day range:
$1.24 - $1.27
52-week range:
$0.99 - $1.63
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
11.50x
P/S ratio:
0.63x
P/B ratio:
0.60x
Volume:
6.9K
Avg. volume:
106.8K
1-year change:
-17.33%
Market cap:
$9.5M
Revenue:
$15.4M
EPS (TTM):
$0.28
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
$1.25 | -- | $9.5M | 11.50x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.63x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$0.38 | -- | $9.4M | 810.21x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.59x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$1.40 | -- | $6.4M | 75.33x | $0.05 | 0% | 1.02x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
$0.42 | -- | $8.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.50x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
$1.94 | -- | $115.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 35.17x |
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
$6.19 | -- | $8.6M | 5.25x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.75x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | 1.418 | -- | 1.59x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
3.68% | -2.181 | 1.05% | 5.03x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
7.57% | 0.683 | 7.57% | 2.98x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
2.59% | 4.234 | 5.34% | 1.88x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | 4.699 | -- | 6.29x |
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
2.93% | 1.766 | 0.94% | 1.41x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 13.66% | 13.71% | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$384.3K | -$268.8K | -122.09% | -124.48% | -7.04% | -$727.4K |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$301K | -$542K | -7.38% | -8.32% | -45.93% | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -17.65% | -18.39% | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -55.86% | -55.86% | -- | -- |
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 14.2% | 14.85% | -- | -- |
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CLWT or CIIT?
Tianci International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net margin of -7.04%. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71% beat Tianci International, Inc.'s return on equity of -124.48%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.-- -- $15.8M CIITTianci International, Inc.10.07% -$0.02 $2.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CLWT or CIIT?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tianci International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tianci International, Inc., analysts believe Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Tianci International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0 0 0 CIITTianci International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CLWT or CIIT More Risky?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.879, which suggesting that the stock is 12.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tianci International, Inc. has a beta of -2.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 385.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLWT or CIIT?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tianci International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tianci International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLWT or CIIT?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tianci International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tianci International, Inc.'s net income of -$268.9K. Notably, Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.50x while Tianci International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 810.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. is 0.63x versus 0.59x for Tianci International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0.63x 11.50x -- -- CIITTianci International, Inc.0.59x 810.21x $3.8M -$268.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns CLWT or HIHO?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net margin of -31.53%. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71% beat Highway Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.-- -- $15.8M HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.25.51% -$0.08 $6.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CLWT or HIHO?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Highway Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0 0 0 HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CLWT or HIHO More Risky?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.879, which suggesting that the stock is 12.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.379, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.149%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLWT or HIHO?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Highway Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings Ltd. pays out 497.93% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLWT or HIHO?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.2M. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$372K. Notably, Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.50x while Highway Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 75.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. is 0.63x versus 1.02x for Highway Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0.63x 11.50x -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.1.02x 75.33x $1.2M -$372K
-
Which has Higher Returns CLWT or ILAG?
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71% beat Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.-- -- $15.8M ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.-- -- $14.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CLWT or ILAG?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc., analysts believe Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0 0 0 ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CLWT or ILAG More Risky?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.879, which suggesting that the stock is 12.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLWT or ILAG?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLWT or ILAG?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.50x while Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. is 0.63x versus 1.50x for Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0.63x 11.50x -- -- ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.1.50x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLWT or ROMA?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71% beat Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s return on equity of -55.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.-- -- $15.8M ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.-- -- $7.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CLWT or ROMA?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roma Green Finance Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Roma Green Finance Ltd., analysts believe Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Roma Green Finance Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0 0 0 ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CLWT or ROMA More Risky?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.879, which suggesting that the stock is 12.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLWT or ROMA?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Roma Green Finance Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roma Green Finance Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLWT or ROMA?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roma Green Finance Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.50x while Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. is 0.63x versus 35.17x for Roma Green Finance Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0.63x 11.50x -- -- ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.35.17x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLWT or SUGP?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71% beat SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.-- -- $15.8M SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.9M -
What do Analysts Say About CLWT or SUGP?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SU Group Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than SU Group Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. is more attractive than SU Group Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0 0 0 SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CLWT or SUGP More Risky?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.879, which suggesting that the stock is 12.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLWT or SUGP?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SU Group Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLWT or SUGP?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.50x while SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 5.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. is 0.63x versus 1.75x for SU Group Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0.63x 11.50x -- -- SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.1.75x 5.25x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
