Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
55
HIHO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.41
Seasonality move
:
3.35%
Day range:
$1.30 - $1.48
52-week range:
$0.77 - $2.21
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
75.33x
P/S ratio:
1.02x
P/B ratio:
1.08x
Volume:
4M
Avg. volume:
5.5M
1-year change:
-27.84%
Market cap:
$6.4M
Revenue:
$7.4M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.12
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$1.40 | -- | $6.4M | 75.33x | $0.05 | 0% | 1.02x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$0.38 | -- | $9.4M | 810.21x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.59x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
$1.25 | -- | $9.5M | 11.50x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.63x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
$0.42 | -- | $8.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.50x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
$1.94 | -- | $115.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 35.17x |
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
$6.19 | -- | $8.6M | 5.25x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.75x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
7.57% | 0.683 | 7.57% | 2.98x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
3.68% | -2.181 | 1.05% | 5.03x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | 1.418 | -- | 1.59x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
2.59% | 4.234 | 5.34% | 1.88x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | 4.699 | -- | 6.29x |
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
2.93% | 1.766 | 0.94% | 1.41x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$301K | -$542K | -7.38% | -8.32% | -45.93% | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$384.3K | -$268.8K | -122.09% | -124.48% | -7.04% | -$727.4K |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 13.66% | 13.71% | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -17.65% | -18.39% | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -55.86% | -55.86% | -- | -- |
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 14.2% | 14.85% | -- | -- |
Highway Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HIHO or CIIT?
Tianci International, Inc. has a net margin of -31.53% compared to Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -7.04%. Highway Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.32% beat Tianci International, Inc.'s return on equity of -124.48%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.25.51% -$0.08 $6.5M CIITTianci International, Inc.10.07% -$0.02 $2.8M -
What do Analysts Say About HIHO or CIIT?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tianci International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Highway Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tianci International, Inc., analysts believe Highway Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Tianci International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CIITTianci International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is HIHO or CIIT More Risky?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.379, which suggesting that the stock is 62.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tianci International, Inc. has a beta of -2.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 385.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HIHO or CIIT?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tianci International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Highway Holdings Ltd. pays 497.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Tianci International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HIHO or CIIT?
Highway Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are smaller than Tianci International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$372K is lower than Tianci International, Inc.'s net income of -$268.9K. Notably, Highway Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 75.33x while Tianci International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 810.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highway Holdings Ltd. is 1.02x versus 0.59x for Tianci International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.1.02x 75.33x $1.2M -$372K CIITTianci International, Inc.0.59x 810.21x $3.8M -$268.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns HIHO or CLWT?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -31.53% compared to Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Highway Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.32% beat Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.25.51% -$0.08 $6.5M CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.-- -- $15.8M -
What do Analysts Say About HIHO or CLWT?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Highway Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd., analysts believe Highway Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HIHO or CLWT More Risky?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.379, which suggesting that the stock is 62.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.879, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.111%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HIHO or CLWT?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Highway Holdings Ltd. pays 497.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HIHO or CLWT?
Highway Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are larger than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$372K is higher than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Highway Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 75.33x while Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highway Holdings Ltd. is 1.02x versus 0.63x for Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.1.02x 75.33x $1.2M -$372K CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0.63x 11.50x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HIHO or ILAG?
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a net margin of -31.53% compared to Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Highway Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.32% beat Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.25.51% -$0.08 $6.5M ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.-- -- $14.5M -
What do Analysts Say About HIHO or ILAG?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Highway Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc., analysts believe Highway Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is HIHO or ILAG More Risky?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.379, which suggesting that the stock is 62.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HIHO or ILAG?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Highway Holdings Ltd. pays 497.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HIHO or ILAG?
Highway Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are larger than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$372K is higher than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Highway Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 75.33x while Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highway Holdings Ltd. is 1.02x versus 1.50x for Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.1.02x 75.33x $1.2M -$372K ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.1.50x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HIHO or ROMA?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a net margin of -31.53% compared to Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Highway Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.32% beat Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s return on equity of -55.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.25.51% -$0.08 $6.5M ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.-- -- $7.6M -
What do Analysts Say About HIHO or ROMA?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roma Green Finance Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Highway Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Roma Green Finance Ltd., analysts believe Highway Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Roma Green Finance Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HIHO or ROMA More Risky?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.379, which suggesting that the stock is 62.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HIHO or ROMA?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Roma Green Finance Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Highway Holdings Ltd. pays 497.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Roma Green Finance Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HIHO or ROMA?
Highway Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are larger than Roma Green Finance Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$372K is higher than Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Highway Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 75.33x while Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highway Holdings Ltd. is 1.02x versus 35.17x for Roma Green Finance Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.1.02x 75.33x $1.2M -$372K ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.35.17x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HIHO or SUGP?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -31.53% compared to Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Highway Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.32% beat SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.25.51% -$0.08 $6.5M SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.9M -
What do Analysts Say About HIHO or SUGP?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SU Group Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Highway Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than SU Group Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Highway Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than SU Group Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HIHO or SUGP More Risky?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.379, which suggesting that the stock is 62.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HIHO or SUGP?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SU Group Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Highway Holdings Ltd. pays 497.93% of its earnings as a dividend. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HIHO or SUGP?
Highway Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.2M, which are larger than SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$372K is higher than SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Highway Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 75.33x while SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 5.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highway Holdings Ltd. is 1.02x versus 1.75x for SU Group Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.1.02x 75.33x $1.2M -$372K SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.1.75x 5.25x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
