Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
67
ROMA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.08
Seasonality move
:
99.28%
Day range:
$4.94 - $5.50
52-week range:
$0.97 - $11.77
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
97.27x
P/B ratio:
28.43x
Volume:
118.9K
Avg. volume:
640.6K
1-year change:
415.82%
Market cap:
$319.6M
Revenue:
$1.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.14
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GCDT
Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
$5.37 | -- | $319.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 97.27x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$1.74 | -- | $6.3M | 810.21x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.85x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
$1.23 | -- | $9.3M | 16.90x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.67x |
|
GCDT
Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.89 | -- | $4.1M | 75.33x | $0.05 | 0% | 0.75x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
$3.71 | -- | $7.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.32x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | 3.674 | -- | 6.29x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
3.47% | 1.564 | 0.59% | 17.58x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | 0.589 | -- | 1.59x |
|
GCDT
Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit)
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
5.14% | 1.847 | 5.47% | 3.70x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
2.59% | 3.730 | 5.34% | 1.88x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -55.86% | -55.86% | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$90.3K | -$417.1K | -115.6% | -118.33% | -10.74% | -$954.8K |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 13.66% | 13.71% | -- | -- |
|
GCDT
Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$292K | -$486K | -11.11% | -12.28% | -42.37% | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -17.65% | -18.39% | -- | -- |
Roma Green Finance Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ROMA or CIIT?
Tianci International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net margin of -10.74%. Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s return on equity of -55.86% beat Tianci International, Inc.'s return on equity of -118.33%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.-- -- $7.6M CIITTianci International, Inc.2.33% -$0.12 $2.7M -
What do Analysts Say About ROMA or CIIT?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tianci International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Roma Green Finance Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tianci International, Inc., analysts believe Roma Green Finance Ltd. is more attractive than Tianci International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.0 0 0 CIITTianci International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is ROMA or CIIT More Risky?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tianci International, Inc. has a beta of -1.935, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 293.53%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROMA or CIIT?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tianci International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Roma Green Finance Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tianci International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROMA or CIIT?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tianci International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.9M. Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tianci International, Inc.'s net income of -$417.1K. Notably, Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tianci International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 810.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roma Green Finance Ltd. is 97.27x versus 0.85x for Tianci International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.97.27x -- -- -- CIITTianci International, Inc.0.85x 810.21x $3.9M -$417.1K
-
Which has Higher Returns ROMA or CLWT?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net margin of --. Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s return on equity of -55.86% beat Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.-- -- $7.6M CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.-- -- $15.8M -
What do Analysts Say About ROMA or CLWT?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Roma Green Finance Ltd. has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd., analysts believe Roma Green Finance Ltd. is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.0 0 0 CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ROMA or CLWT More Risky?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.961, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.887%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROMA or CLWT?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Roma Green Finance Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROMA or CLWT?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 16.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roma Green Finance Ltd. is 97.27x versus 0.67x for Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.97.27x -- -- -- CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0.67x 16.90x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ROMA or GCDT?
Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit) has a net margin of -- compared to Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net margin of --. Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s return on equity of -55.86% beat Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.-- -- $7.6M GCDTGreen Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ROMA or GCDT?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Roma Green Finance Ltd. has higher upside potential than Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit), analysts believe Roma Green Finance Ltd. is more attractive than Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.0 0 0 GCDTGreen Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit)0 0 0 -
Is ROMA or GCDT More Risky?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit) has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROMA or GCDT?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Roma Green Finance Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROMA or GCDT?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit) quarterly revenues of --. Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit)'s net income of --. Notably, Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roma Green Finance Ltd. is 97.27x versus -- for Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.97.27x -- -- -- GCDTGreen Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd (Unit)-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ROMA or HIHO?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net margin of -11.33%. Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s return on equity of -55.86% beat Highway Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -12.28%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.-- -- $7.6M HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.25.46% -$0.03 $6.2M -
What do Analysts Say About ROMA or HIHO?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Roma Green Finance Ltd. has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Roma Green Finance Ltd. is more attractive than Highway Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.0 0 0 HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ROMA or HIHO More Risky?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.493, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.709%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROMA or HIHO?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Highway Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Roma Green Finance Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings Ltd. pays out 497.93% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROMA or HIHO?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.1M. Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$130K. Notably, Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Highway Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 75.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roma Green Finance Ltd. is 97.27x versus 0.75x for Highway Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.97.27x -- -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0.75x 75.33x $1.1M -$130K
-
Which has Higher Returns ROMA or ILAG?
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net margin of --. Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s return on equity of -55.86% beat Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.-- -- $7.6M ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.-- -- $14.5M -
What do Analysts Say About ROMA or ILAG?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Roma Green Finance Ltd. has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc., analysts believe Roma Green Finance Ltd. is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.0 0 0 ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is ROMA or ILAG More Risky?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROMA or ILAG?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Roma Green Finance Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROMA or ILAG?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roma Green Finance Ltd. is 97.27x versus 1.32x for Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.97.27x -- -- -- ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.1.32x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
58
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 31x
Alerts
Sell
22
BMI alert for Apr 20
Badger Meter, Inc. [BMI] is down 1.87% over the past day.
Buy
63
GSIW alert for Apr 20
Garden Stage Ltd. [GSIW] is up 9.79% over the past day.
Buy
56
PBF alert for Apr 20
PBF Energy, Inc. [PBF] is up 1.61% over the past day.
