ILAG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net margin of -445.93%. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.39% beat Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.86 which suggests that it could grow by 23.7%. Given that Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc., analysts believe Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc..

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 2.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.099%.

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues of $58M. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of -$258.6M. Notably, Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. is 1.32x versus 19.65x for Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W.W. Grainger, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net margin of 10.83%. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.39% beat W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s return on equity of 45.81%.

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand W.W. Grainger, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1,158.60 which suggests that it could fall by -0.37%. Given that W.W. Grainger, Inc. has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc., analysts believe W.W. Grainger, Inc. is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc..

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.W. Grainger, Inc. has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.109%.

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. W.W. Grainger, Inc. offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger, Inc. pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than W.W. Grainger, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s net income of $479M. Notably, Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. is 1.32x versus 3.11x for W.W. Grainger, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Masco Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net margin of 9.82%. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.39% beat Masco Corp.'s return on equity of 1286.79%.

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Masco Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $77.84 which suggests that it could grow by 16.92%. Given that Masco Corp. has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc., analysts believe Masco Corp. is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc..

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Masco Corp. has a beta of 1.295, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.51%.

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Masco Corp. offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco Corp. pays out 32.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Masco Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Masco Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Masco Corp.'s net income of $176M. Notably, Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Masco Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. is 1.32x versus 1.85x for Masco Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net margin of -43532.98%. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.39% beat Solidion Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solidion Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, Inc., analysts believe Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. is more attractive than Solidion Technology, Inc..

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solidion Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solidion Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solidion Technology, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Solidion Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.4K. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Solidion Technology, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solidion Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. is 1.32x versus 1,734.91x for Solidion Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.