RANJY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Airbus SE has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Randstad NV's net margin of 6.09%. Randstad NV's return on equity of 1.68% beat Airbus SE's return on equity of 22.44%.

Randstad NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Airbus SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Randstad NV has higher upside potential than Airbus SE, analysts believe Randstad NV is more attractive than Airbus SE.

Randstad NV has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.733% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Airbus SE has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.242%.

Randstad NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.91%. Airbus SE offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Randstad NV pays 196.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Airbus SE pays out 28.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Airbus SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Randstad NV's is not.

Randstad NV quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are smaller than Airbus SE quarterly revenues of $20.8B. Randstad NV's net income of $97M is lower than Airbus SE's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Randstad NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 96.90x while Airbus SE's PE ratio is 32.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Randstad NV is 0.24x versus 2.24x for Airbus SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ferrovial SE has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Randstad NV's net margin of --. Randstad NV's return on equity of 1.68% beat Ferrovial SE's return on equity of --.

Randstad NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ferrovial SE has an analysts' consensus of $71.01 which suggests that it could fall by -0.37%. Given that Ferrovial SE has higher upside potential than Randstad NV, analysts believe Ferrovial SE is more attractive than Randstad NV.

Randstad NV has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.733% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferrovial SE has a beta of -2.282, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 328.185%.

Randstad NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.91%. Ferrovial SE offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Randstad NV pays 196.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrovial SE pays out 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrovial SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Randstad NV's is not.

Randstad NV quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Ferrovial SE quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Randstad NV's net income of $97M is higher than Ferrovial SE's net income of --. Notably, Randstad NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 96.90x while Ferrovial SE's PE ratio is 12.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Randstad NV is 0.24x versus 5.06x for Ferrovial SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Randstad NV's net margin of --. Randstad NV's return on equity of 1.68% beat Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's return on equity of 8.94%.

Randstad NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Randstad NV has higher upside potential than Koninklijke BAM Groep NV, analysts believe Randstad NV is more attractive than Koninklijke BAM Groep NV.

Randstad NV has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.733% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a beta of 0.347, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.258%.

Randstad NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.91%. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Randstad NV pays 196.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV pays out 81.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Randstad NV's is not.

Randstad NV quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Koninklijke BAM Groep NV quarterly revenues of --. Randstad NV's net income of $97M is higher than Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's net income of --. Notably, Randstad NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 96.90x while Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's PE ratio is 19.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Randstad NV is 0.24x versus 0.38x for Koninklijke BAM Groep NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Randstad NV's net margin of --. Randstad NV's return on equity of 1.68% beat Wolters Kluwer NV's return on equity of 86.21%.

Randstad NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wolters Kluwer NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Randstad NV has higher upside potential than Wolters Kluwer NV, analysts believe Randstad NV is more attractive than Wolters Kluwer NV.

Randstad NV has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.733% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolters Kluwer NV has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.703%.

Randstad NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.91%. Wolters Kluwer NV offers a yield of 3.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Randstad NV pays 196.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolters Kluwer NV pays out 45.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolters Kluwer NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Randstad NV's is not.

Randstad NV quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Wolters Kluwer NV quarterly revenues of --. Randstad NV's net income of $97M is higher than Wolters Kluwer NV's net income of --. Notably, Randstad NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 96.90x while Wolters Kluwer NV's PE ratio is 20.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Randstad NV is 0.24x versus 2.87x for Wolters Kluwer NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.