RANJY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Airbus SE has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Randstad NV's net margin of 6.09%. Randstad NV's return on equity of 1.68% beat Airbus SE's return on equity of 22.44%.

Randstad NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Airbus SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Randstad NV has higher upside potential than Airbus SE, analysts believe Randstad NV is more attractive than Airbus SE.

Randstad NV has a beta of 0.875, which suggesting that the stock is 12.505% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Airbus SE has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.803%.

Randstad NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.78%. Airbus SE offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Randstad NV pays 196.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Airbus SE pays out 28.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Airbus SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Randstad NV's is not.

Randstad NV quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are smaller than Airbus SE quarterly revenues of $20.8B. Randstad NV's net income of $97M is lower than Airbus SE's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Randstad NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.59x while Airbus SE's PE ratio is 33.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Randstad NV is 0.25x versus 2.30x for Airbus SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ferrovial SE has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Randstad NV's net margin of --. Randstad NV's return on equity of 1.68% beat Ferrovial SE's return on equity of --.

Randstad NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ferrovial SE has an analysts' consensus of $71.01 which suggests that it could grow by 8.88%. Given that Ferrovial SE has higher upside potential than Randstad NV, analysts believe Ferrovial SE is more attractive than Randstad NV.

Randstad NV has a beta of 0.875, which suggesting that the stock is 12.505% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferrovial SE has a beta of -2.255, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 325.498%.

Randstad NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.78%. Ferrovial SE offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Randstad NV pays 196.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrovial SE pays out 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrovial SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Randstad NV's is not.

Randstad NV quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Ferrovial SE quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Randstad NV's net income of $97M is higher than Ferrovial SE's net income of --. Notably, Randstad NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.59x while Ferrovial SE's PE ratio is 12.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Randstad NV is 0.25x versus 4.63x for Ferrovial SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICTS International NV has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Randstad NV's net margin of --. Randstad NV's return on equity of 1.68% beat ICTS International NV's return on equity of 5.54%.

Randstad NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ICTS International NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Randstad NV has higher upside potential than ICTS International NV, analysts believe Randstad NV is more attractive than ICTS International NV.

Randstad NV has a beta of 0.875, which suggesting that the stock is 12.505% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICTS International NV has a beta of 0.731, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.895%.

Randstad NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.78%. ICTS International NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Randstad NV pays 196.51% of its earnings as a dividend. ICTS International NV pays out 83.26% of its earnings as a dividend. ICTS International NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Randstad NV's is not.

Randstad NV quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than ICTS International NV quarterly revenues of --. Randstad NV's net income of $97M is higher than ICTS International NV's net income of --. Notably, Randstad NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.59x while ICTS International NV's PE ratio is 43.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Randstad NV is 0.25x versus 0.25x for ICTS International NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a net margin of 1.43% compared to Randstad NV's net margin of --. Randstad NV's return on equity of 1.68% beat Wolters Kluwer NV's return on equity of 86.21%.

Randstad NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wolters Kluwer NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Randstad NV has higher upside potential than Wolters Kluwer NV, analysts believe Randstad NV is more attractive than Wolters Kluwer NV.

Randstad NV has a beta of 0.875, which suggesting that the stock is 12.505% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolters Kluwer NV has a beta of 0.666, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.42%.

Randstad NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.78%. Wolters Kluwer NV offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Randstad NV pays 196.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolters Kluwer NV pays out 45.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolters Kluwer NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Randstad NV's is not.

Randstad NV quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Wolters Kluwer NV quarterly revenues of --. Randstad NV's net income of $97M is higher than Wolters Kluwer NV's net income of --. Notably, Randstad NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.59x while Wolters Kluwer NV's PE ratio is 20.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Randstad NV is 0.25x versus 3.73x for Wolters Kluwer NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.